Alfesaani.
22 September 2023 at 12:21
Hello.
The public road connecting our plot of land is in such a bad situation, due to heavy trucks plying over it, that it's risky and very difficult to drive one's car over it during the rainy season. After contacting the local authorities to ask for proper construction of the road, they replied that the money they have for works is not sanctioned for road construction at the moment. What legal remedy do we have for that? Can we file a Mandamus petition before the High Court to get the road constructed? Thanks in advance.
Sagar Dada
20 September 2023 at 15:53
I am a freedom fighter grand son no any facilities provide till now from ministry of Home affairs rule I applied for petrol pump in cc2 FF category then. Ministry rule said to me you are not eligible for this because only freedom fighter will present on applying time I said to a officer sir there is no any freedom fighter present in this times all in whole Uttar Pradesh then dependent is present on this time then no any rules for dependent for the petrol pump advertisement from home affairs no any rule came sir this is very bad rule why is not removed this category FF in ministry of petroleum
Anonymous
02 September 2023 at 14:15
Sir,
Pension to govt servants is protected in Article 309.But without promulgation under Article 309,
1. Executive order for New pension scheme was notified on 22.12.2003, followed by a PFRDA ordinance which was notified and lapsed April 2003.
2. Again, a fresh PFRDA ordinance was notified immediately.
3. After many ordinances lapsed, finally it became Act after passed by parliament in 2014 giving retrospective effect on the executive order notification dated 23.12.2003.
4. Till that time, an executive order notification was over riding pension rules of Article 309.
I have come across many supreme court judgements ruling executive order cannot over ride or change or alter the rules under Article 309 and some not favouring retrospective effect too.
In view of the above, the implementation of NPS can legally valid only after it became law. Can we approach court on the above contention?
Thanks in advance
Anonymous
02 September 2023 at 12:36
Sir,
Pension to govt servants is protected in Article 309.But without promulgation under Article 309,
1. Executive order for New pension scheme was notified on 22.12.2003, followed by a PFRDA ordinance which was notified and lapsed April 2003.
2. Again, a fresh PFRDA ordinance was notified immediately.
3. After many ordinances lapsed, finally it became Act after passed by parliament in 2014 giving retrospective effect on the executive order notification dated 23.12.2003.
4. Till that time, an executive order notification was over riding pension rules of Article 309.
I have come across many supreme court judgements ruling executive order cannot over ride or change or alter the rules under Article 309 and some not favouring retrospective effect too.
In view of the above, the implementation of NPS can legally valid only after it became law. Can we approach court on the above contention?
Thanks in advance
Durk Jasen
26 July 2023 at 15:50
Recently, I found myself employing a software developer for crypto recovery. I'm delighted. I obtained an additional understanding of technology and the cyber sphere and discovered that, with the appropriate coder, anything is possible. I believe it is my obligation to provide you all with a reliable programmer if you have fallen victim to a Bitcoin or other cryptocurrency scam. When I went to withdraw the 107,000 USD I had put with an investment company, I started having a lot of complications. I could not access my money with the assistance of the supposedly Bitcoin miners. Given the fact that I made all of my investment deposits using different undetectable cryptocurrencies, I persisted in trying to get my money back. Fortunately, I was able to get my money back with the help of Wizard Web Recovery. I praise Wizard Web Recovery's talents. Please get in touch with wizardwebrecovery@programmer.net or visit their Homepage: wizardwebrecovery.net, if you ever discover that you need a programmer's assistance.
Anonymous
21 July 2023 at 15:34
Sir, Namaste
My name is Naresh from Andhra pradesh I have completed 10+2 regular course.
then 3 years degree in ambedkar open university.
Later I did LLB regular. But Andhra Pradesh Bar Council is not registering them.They say they will not enroll as it is an open degree. Please advise me.
Anonymous
21 July 2023 at 14:45
Sir, Namaste
My name is Naresh from Andhra pradesh I have completed 10+2 regular then 3 years degree in ambedkar open university. Later I did LLB regular. But Andhra Pradesh Bar Council is not registering them. They say they will not enroll as it is an open degree. Please advise me.
Soing Shade
01 July 2023 at 07:11
I`m happy sharing this experiences to testify about a great and powerful spell caster, my husband left me and the kids for 2 weeks when i called him he didn't pick up when he came back home the 3rd week he told me he wanted a divorce i was so sad i cried all night he left again i was so lonely the next day i was searching for something online when i found a spell caster called DR PETER who have helped so many people with their problems so i contacted him with my problems he told me it will take 24 hours and my husband will be back to me i did everything he told me to do and the next day my husband came back kneeling and begging he canceled the divorce we are now happy together DR PETER can help you too Email him at drpeterspellcaster21@gmail.com
Anonymous
14 May 2023 at 20:57
In the absence of any substantial question of law, the court posted the case "for orders". The Appellant filed an amended petition under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC for additional substantial questions of law and filed an additional evidence petition under Order 41 Rule 27 of CPC. Both these applications contain false statements (Section 209 of IPC). The court allowed those applications and admitted the 2nd appeal. The appellant caused extensive damage to property & personal injury that attracts Articles 14,19, 21& 300A.
Question: Rather than asking the same court (where 2nd appeal is pending) to consider the issue under 340(1) CrPC and then refer to the Magistrate for action, a petition under 226 be filed for necessary orders under Section 209 of IPC to expedite the matter.
Many thanks for your help.
Member Strength 9,46,585 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Clubbing of original suit and writ petitions
Can an original suit and a writ petition be clubbed together? What is the constitutional provisions that allows it? What conditions/grounds to be considered while clubbing them?