nabin
17 February 2014 at 15:04
Dear Sir
I am Nabin,serving in MOD as AEE(Group-A, through UPSC), since may-2013. I would like to avail EoL for 10 months for the preparation of other exam. In appointment letter, it is mentioned that, the post is permanent but initial appointment will be on temporary basis.
I am looking for some guidance to clarify my confusion about,
1. what are the maximum period of EoL that I can get.
2. Do the organization have powers to take any extreme steps like termination of service, if I am sending medical certificates regularly,
Thanks you.
santhosh
17 February 2014 at 15:03
Is any recovery can be done in pension. (after retirement of employee).
truman
17 February 2014 at 14:21
Can I ask information regarding of VRS-2000 given by a nationalised bank bank in the year 2001, which is retrospective to the act. or in other words can a bank refuse to give details about my VRS-2ooo details stating that the RTI Act will not cover retrospective information?
RAJ
17 February 2014 at 12:44
RESPECTED SIR KINDLY GUIDE ME
There exists a property inherited from the grandfather to my father and my two uncles.the property was given to three on separate schedule and the exact side measurements of the plots were not specified .In 1989 a house was constructed on the plot with active participation and consent of the brothers when their father was alive.
After around 14 years later to seek vengeance for some family dispute one brother approached the local munsiff court filing a suit that the my family members removed the survey stones on (2-9-2004) after when he tried to measure the land with officials for the construction of compound wall(20-8-2004) and .
The relief sought or his prayers were.
1.To allow the fixation of the boundary and to construct the boundary wall
2.Prohibitory injunction to restrain my family from trespassing into his property and obstruction to fix boundary.
the Oral testimony of defence and prosecution witnesses,the partition deeds,documents and the report by the assigned commissioner and surveyor,were scrutinized. The commissioner report tells the fact that there is a gross reduction in the area of the land as specified in documents and a part of our house lay on his share .the Munsiff found he paramount right to fix the boundary passed a judgement for compound wall by demolition of the building.
[(Even if his plaint did involve any prayer for demolition of building,recovery of possession or mandatory injunction for the demolition of the building that exceeds into his share.)]
An appeal memorandum is filed in the district court by us stating the lack of opportunity to produce documents,no side measurements in the documents etc.
Three points arise for the court
1.entitled to fix boundary by the process of court. 2.to construct boundary wall 3.to intervene the lower court order.
Cross examination of him made the facts certain to the court
1.He did not know that the properties were not demarcated when the settlement deed was executed.
2.He did not know total extent of land
3.He had no objection at the time of construction of the house in 1989.
4. He admitted about the reduction of land.
5.He told there were visible survey stones demarcating the property until 2-9-2004, when he said we removed the stones.
6.He also admitted the building was there in 2000
From the above facts it is clear that we have constructed the building in 1989 with his consent.
The judgement of Paravur Munsiff was found unwarranted in the case of demolition of the building projecting into the uncles property.
And district judge passed a decree to him to fix the boundaries of his plot with out affecting the building leaving an open space of 2 feet between the building and compound wall.
But my problem begins now.
Its an order for him, he has to go for the execution procedure.But he is not going for it as he has a reduction in his area.We also cannot go for EP sice we haven’t asked for a counterclaim to demarcate the boundary and construct compound wall.
Moreover he has started construction in his allotted plot without demarcating boundary as directed by the court.He also has taken possession of beyond the limits given in the order.
What legal step is to be taken from our side to stop the construction till the boundaty is demarcated by the court, and hence the construction of wall.Or can we go for EP.Is there any way to obtain a stay order for the construction.Is there any option with poloice as for the execution of this court order.Sir kindly enlighten me with the legal steps.
Yours faithfully
SOORAJ.S
Hemant Narayan Gokhale
17 February 2014 at 01:41
notice issued under mrtp act or Bpmc act bad in law whether civil court has jurisdiction to entertain
hitesh s savlani
16 February 2014 at 23:12
hello experts,
my question is related with property matter ,there are 2 parties and b were a is applicant and be is respondent, in this case i am a ,my question is that during cross exam is running the respondent had brought some fraudly singed papers of the applicant and these documents are kept on record of the court ,but yet the court has not put any exepet no on it
1)can respondent can addmint any document at any time while this case is run around 7 years around
2)can a court take the opinion of handwritting expert ,and which section it is valid
please suggest me what should i do in this curcumtances
hitesh s savlani
16 February 2014 at 23:09
hello experts,
my question is related with property matter ,there are 2 parties and b were a is applicant and be is respondent, in this case i am a ,my question is that during cross exam is running the respondent had brought some fraudly singed papers of the applicant and these documents are kept on record of the court ,but yet the court has not put any exepet no on it
1)can respondent can addmint any document at any time while this case is run around 7 years around
2)can a court take the opinion of handwritting expert ,and which section it is valid
please suggest me what should i do in this curcumtances
not happy
16 February 2014 at 20:57
I narrate the complete case kindly guide me how to proceed with i am a female working in a government school in tamil nadu .i taken a loan from Co-operative society where as I signed a guarantor for my principal and he signed for me. In this situation I had a personal misunderstanding with him and completely stop talking to him. I got due for my co-operative societies loan where as he too have dues but being a drawing officer with the personal vengeance he detected only my due amount where as many of them woking in the same school having dues months to gether. Co-operative society given only due notice for all the staffs not mention only my name but he detected only my salary knowing. By knowing I am away from husband and I cannot defend myself he is putting lot off work discrimination and financial pressure on me. I field an RTI on this incident to know the fact still now he never replied for it and also he informed to close friend that let me see how she will take housing loan . kindly guide me how to approach this incident. Is there a possibility to with draw my guarantorship or how can I make him to pay the dues. Note :- no one had paid due months together even he got due.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Pension
Is any recovery can be done in pension. (after retirement of employee).