Suraj Kumar
01 December 2024 at 21:51
Respected Sir,
I had filed child custody case for my son. An interlocutory application was filed by me for proper education from reputed school. High Court also directed ADJ to dispose application regarding schooling within two months.
In the meantime I had admitted ny son in Kendriya Vidyalaya in class one. My opposite party had refused to send my son to Kendriya Vidyalaya & admitted my son in local regional school.
After hearing from both side, the Court has directed to send my son to Kendriya Vidyalaya.
Opposite party is refusing to comply court's order & didnot send my son to Kendriya Vidyalaya.
Can I approach Court for tranfer of custody to me for future & welfare & contempt of Court's Order ?
Anything else, please advise.
Anonymous
28 November 2024 at 18:11
What is Recovery Certificate in DRT?
JEGADEESAN
27 November 2024 at 16:38
Sir,
I would like to clarify some doubt that whether any third party can file the caveat against the Owner( seller) and buyer of the land ?
Some workers namely Chandran & Maharajan had been working in some land which has been bought by Sudalai i.e. S No.404/1 After Sub Division 404/1B1 ( vide Doc No 1085/1982 to the extent of 2.23 Acres & Doc No.1051/1986 to the extent of 40 Cents)
Subsequently that Workers had purchased to the extent of 40 Cents from the Land Owner in 2012 ( Southern Part of that land) .Which has been purchased by Sudalai Vide Doc No 1051/1986
Thereafter I have purchased on 20.11.2024 to the extent of 2.23 Acres in the same Survey Number which has been bought by the Owner vide Doc No 1085/1982
Now the Workers/Caveators claimed that entire land is belonged to them even they have title to the extent of 40 Cents in Southern Part of Survey No .404/1
Today I have received the Notice from their advocate regarding the above dispute
Is there any provision under CPC or any logic to file caveat against me and the owner ?
Since he has the title, he sold to me .
On What basis the Caveators claim that they are the owners of the land which has been bought by me .
1. Whether can I block to file the caveat through any court proceedings?
2. Should I just reply to Advocate Notice or take steps to any court proceedings?
3. Whether can I get stay to file any case against me by those workers/Caveators?
You are requested kindly to give your best opinion
Dawn Taylor
26 November 2024 at 21:24
I would like to express my sincere appreciation to H A C K M A V E N S 5 (AT) G M A I L DOT COM for their exceptional assistance in rectifying my credit report. They successfully removed all negative entries, including collections, charge-offs, utility bills, and student loans that had adversely affected my credit standing. After attempting to resolve these issues with several other individuals, a friend recommended H A C K M A V E N S, sharing his own positive experience with their services. Remarkably, my credit score improved from 510 to over 700 in just a few days, allowing me to enjoy an excellent credit report and a debt-free life. For those seeking similar assistance, I encourage you to reach out to them via the provided email address. You will be grateful for their help.
Anonymous
26 November 2024 at 13:45
Discover valuable insights and tips on truck driving through the TruckSmart CDL Academy blog. Stay informed nearby industry trends, training advice, and CDL preparation in Dallas, TX.
If you’re looking for top CDL training schools in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, TruckSmart CDL Academy stands out as a leading choice. Experienced for its comprehensive curriculum and experienced instructors, TruckSmart prepares students for together written and driving tests. With a strong emphasis on safety and practical skills, graduates feel positive and ready to enter the trucking industry. Their flexible schedules cater to various lifestyles, making it an ideal choice for aspiring truck drivers.
raju
22 November 2024 at 13:28
That an employee in private job was removed without any inquiry and notice and also withheld all his payment of dues. When the employer did not pay any heed the employee sent demand notice to employer who after a though filed false complaints before police authorities just to pressurizer the employee. Ultimately the employee filed civil suit against employer for reinstate with back wages. My query is that employer is leveling false complaints after the employee notice what remedy available to employee since the employer is approachable and money power.
Vasudevan
19 November 2024 at 20:46
Respected Learned Experts, I need a certfied copy of a judgment from Madras High Court for my reference. Please tell me the procedure of obtaining a certified copy and please share the pdf copy of the format, if any. I shall be much obliged if any of the Learned Expert practicing at Chennai may help in obtaining the copy. I shall bare the cost of the service. The judgment is required to file claim from my department by enclosing the copy of the same. Thank you very much to one and all in the Forum, in anticipation.
raju
19 November 2024 at 14:40
In rejoinder/replication do all paras to be stated with facts or simple denied and prove in evidence. Please advice
Amit kumar
14 November 2024 at 12:20
Mera naam Amit h jo ki maine Tis hazari court me civil case kiya hua h ..mera 88 guj h or jo chacha ka ladka h uske pas 350 guj hai ...350 guj mere dada k naam par mcd me naam hai ...jiske according maine 1/3rd share ki demand ki h total 430 (88+350) mese . aaj ki date par mere bete k pas rehne ko jangha nai h ...or 350 guj me kam se kam 50 room hai ..kya main interim relief for temporary residence aone bete k liye application file kr skta hu kya ? property aamne samne hai bich me road h ...mtlb 88 guj k samne 350 guj hai .. abi TIs hazari se status quo maintain krne ko kaha hai 2017 order se .. kuki jab hum 88 guj banwa rhe the toh 2017 me toh jabi samne walo ne b status quo le liya tha .. jisse mere ek bete k pas rehne ko jangha nai hai.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Title partition suit
A TITLE PARTITION SUIT WHICH IS MORE THAN 30 YEARS OLD IS BEING DELAYED UNNECESSARILY BY THE PLAINTIFF ALONG WITH A FEW SUPPORTING DEFENDANTS JUST TO DELAY THE FINAL DECREE PROCEEDINGS. INSPITE OF THEIR OBJECTIONS BEING REJECTED SEVERAL TIMES THE COURT IS YET TO PASS A FINAL DECREE OF THE SAID TITLE PARTITION SUIT.