Anonymous
16 July 2026 at 15:52
The Central List of Other Backward Classes for Rajasthan, published by the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC), mentions “Kalal (Tak)” at Entry No. 25. I belong to the Kalal community but do not belong to the Tak sub-caste, nor do I use Tak as my surname or identify it as a synonym of my community.
The SDM Office, Dhariyawad, has taken the view that I must prove that I belong to the Tak sub-caste/synonym in order to be issued a Central OBC Certificate. Since I am not a member of the Tak sub-caste, I am unable to produce such proof.
However, I rely upon NCBC Letter No. 12011/9/94-BCC, which provides that communities included in both the Mandal Commission List and the State OBC List are deemed to be included in the Central OBC List. The Kalal community is included at Entry No. 69 of the Mandal Commission (Mandal Commission Report) List and at Entry No. 32 of the Rajasthan State OBC List.
Further, I have obtained an RTI reply showing that, in another district of Rajasthan, a person belonging to the Kalal community was issued a Central OBC Certificate without being required to furnish proof of belonging to the Tak sub-caste.
In these circumstances, I seek legal guidance on whether the SDM can lawfully insist on proof of the Tak sub-caste merely because Entry No. 25 of the Central OBC List is described as “Kalal (Tak)”, despite the above records and the RTI evidence showing a different administrative practice.
Jasvinder
06 July 2026 at 21:38
A pvt ltd company have 2 director.
One director on behalf of company filed a injuction suit in civil court against me.
After much up and down in one other case between these 2 director of company one director other than who file injuction, given statement in high court that he had given resignation long back before this injuction suit and this director had no Locus standi to sue on behalf of pvt ltd company and this director who resign never stand in this injuction suit before the court.
When I came to know this I file o7r11 that this director had no locus standi to file any case in absence of resolution of board of director as Corum is not complete because of one director resignation and because of this no meeting can held and no resolution can be passed.
Am I right at this point.
Any case law.
Thanks in advance.
Anonymous
04 July 2026 at 10:03
Old debt existing of family industrial unit shutdown in 1997 bankrupt and taken over by ksfc.
KSFC is now spending notices saying to gurrantor old promoter to recover under section 32g of sfc act. Anyway they can issue a a state recovery certificate
a rastogi
06 June 2026 at 08:33
All hon'ble learned advocates,
Kindly suggest me on the below summarized matter, what should be done, I am worried about my heavy amount stuck in between..
CASE SUMMARY Parties:
-- Buyer/Consignee: Neeru Rastogi (India)
-- Seller/Shipper: DigiKey Electronics (USA)
-- Carrier: FedEx
Transaction:
-- Electronics order placed with DigiKey.
-- Total order value approximately INR 47,000.
-- Shortly after placing the order, I realized that the wrong product variant had been selected.
Key Facts:
1. Before shipment movement started even before allocating assigning AWB Number, I notified both DigiKey and FedEx that I did not want the shipment and requested Return to Sender (RTS).
2. On 18 May 2026, I emailed FedEx requesting:
-- Refusal of shipment,
-- No customs clearance,
-- No BOE filing,
-- Return to Sender (RTS).
3. On 18 May 2026, I also emailed DigiKey requesting RTS and explaining that the order contained the wrong item.
4. Despite these communications, the shipment continued to move through the FedEx network and eventually arrived in India.
5. I repeatedly informed FedEx that:
-- I refused delivery,
-- I would not provide KYC,
-- I would not authorize BOE filing,
-- I wanted RTS.
6. DigiKey later confirmed in writing: "I have sent a request to FedEx and have asked them to return the package to us."
7. FedEx subsequently created multiple case numbers and confirmed that RTS-related requests were under review.
8. FedEx later requested:
-- An abandonment/refusal letter from me,
-- An RTS declaration letter from DigiKey addressed to Customs,
-- DigiKey's FedEx account details for billing RTS charges.
9. DigiKey later stated that they could not share internal RTS details and also indicated that return may not be possible because the shipment had reached India Customs.
10. As of the latest communication:
-- Shipment has not been delivered to me.
-- I have not accepted the shipment.
-- I have not submitted KYC.
-- I have not authorized BOE filing.
-- No final written RTS approval or rejection has been communicated.
-- No final disposition of the shipment has been communicated since 17 days approximately.
Issues Requiring Legal Opinion:
1. What are my rights after notifying both seller and carrier of refusal before shipment movement/early transit?
2. Can DigiKey require me to accept delivery before allowing a return when RTS was requested before delivery?
3. If RTS is ultimately denied, who bears responsibility for costs incurred after repeated refusal notices?
4. If the shipment is abandoned, returned, or otherwise disposed of, what refund rights do I have?
5. Does the early refusal communication affect liability for shipping, customs, restocking, or return charges?
6. What consumer-protection remedies are available if the matter remains unresolved and funds remain blocked?
Documents Available:
-- Emails to DigiKey requesting RTS.
-- Emails to FedEx requesting refusal and RTS.
-- DigiKey emails confirming RTS request to FedEx.
-- FedEx case references and responses.
-- Shipment tracking history.
Regards.
Ankur
a rastogi
04 June 2026 at 20:29
All hon'ble learned advocates,
Kindly suggest me on the below summarized matter, what should be done, I am worried about my heavy amount stuck in between..
CASE SUMMARY
Parties:
-- Buyer/Consignee: Neeru Rastogi (India)
-- Seller/Shipper: DigiKey Electronics (USA)
-- Carrier: FedEx
Transaction:
-- Electronics order placed with DigiKey.
-- Total order value approximately INR 47,000.
-- Shortly after placing the order, I realized that the wrong product variant had been selected.
Key Facts:
1. Before shipment movement, I notified both DigiKey and FedEx that I did not want the shipment and requested Return to Sender (RTS).
2. On 18 May 2026, I emailed FedEx requesting:
-- Refusal of shipment,
-- No customs clearance,
-- No BOE filing,
-- Return to Sender (RTS).
3. On 18 May 2026, I also emailed DigiKey requesting RTS and explaining that the order contained the wrong item.
4. Despite these communications, the shipment continued to move through the FedEx network and eventually arrived in India.
5. I repeatedly informed FedEx that:
-- I refused delivery,
-- I would not provide KYC,
-- I would not authorize BOE filing,
-- I wanted RTS.
6. DigiKey later confirmed in writing:
"I have sent a request to FedEx and have asked them to return the package to us."
7. FedEx subsequently created multiple case numbers and confirmed that RTS-related requests were under review.
8. FedEx later requested:
-- An abandonment/refusal letter from me,
-- An RTS declaration letter from DigiKey addressed to Customs,
-- DigiKey's FedEx account details for billing RTS charges.
9. DigiKey later stated that they could not share internal RTS details and also indicated that return may not be possible because the shipment had reached India Customs.
10. As of the latest communication:
-- Shipment has not been delivered to me.
-- I have not accepted the shipment.
-- I have not submitted KYC.
-- I have not authorized BOE filing.
-- No final written RTS approval or rejection has been communicated.
-- No final disposition of the shipment has been communicated.
Issues Requiring Legal Opinion:
1. What are my rights after notifying both seller and carrier of refusal before shipment movement/early transit?
2. Can DigiKey require me to accept delivery before allowing a return when RTS was requested before delivery?
3. If RTS is ultimately denied, who bears responsibility for costs incurred after repeated refusal notices?
4. If the shipment is abandoned, returned, or otherwise disposed of, what refund rights do I have?
5. Does the early refusal communication affect liability for shipping, customs, restocking, or return charges?
6. What consumer-protection remedies are available if the matter remains unresolved and funds remain blocked?
Documents Available:
-- Emails to DigiKey requesting RTS.
-- Emails to FedEx requesting refusal and RTS.
-- DigiKey emails confirming RTS request to FedEx.
-- FedEx case references and responses.
-- Shipment tracking history.
Regards.
Ankur
Ratti Gulshanlal
02 June 2026 at 05:02
Central Government employees are deeply aggrieved by the Gazette Notification issued by the Ministry of Finance (Department of Economic affairs) (ECB & PR Division) dated 22 December 2003. This Notification has made the New Pension Scheme (NPS) would be mandatory for all new recruits to the Central Government Services from 01 January, 2004. Department of Pension and Pensioners Welfare (DoPPW) issued an Office Memorandum No. 57/05/2021-P&PW(B) dated 03 March, 2023 with a Subject - Coverage under Central Civil Services (Pension) rules, in place of National Pension System, of those Central Government employees who were recruited against the posts/vacancies advertised/notified for recruitment, on or before 22.12.2003.
Kindly issue a Pension Reform Office Memorandum/Circular stating that THE DATE OF VACANCY SANCTION/RELEASE LETTER BY THE CONCERNED MINISTRY OR DEPARTMENT MAY KINDLY BE TREATED AS DATE OF NOTIFICATION IF IT IS ISSUED PRIOR TO 22/12/2003. Such anomalies need to be rectified and the employees recruited against Vacancies released prior to 22/12/2003 may all be brought to the Old Pension Scheme
Anonymous
25 May 2026 at 12:44
Plaintiff filed application for final decree and metes and bound. Property is owned by plaintiff ymother and defendant is daughter( sister to plaintiff) . Rights have been declared by preliminary decree . Plaintiff is entitle to 1/3rd share, Plaintiff father 1/3rd share and Defendant is entitle for 1/3rd share. Meanwhile Defendant son filed forged Gift Deed impleading himself in the partition suit claiming the property of his father (defendant husband) as donor with forged documents. My sister son is not necessary party to the partition suit. Can impleadment petition will be allowed and if allowed how can it decide the title of suit property after after declaration of shares in preliminary decree.
Please kindly advise what will be result of my preliminary decree when it has attained finality after Supreme Court confirming my preliminary decree.
Thank you
m.satyanarayana
25 May 2026 at 12:41
Plaintiff filed application for final decree and metes and bound. Property is owned by plaintiff ymother and defendant is daughter( sister to plaintiff) . Rights have been declared by preliminary decree . Plaintiff is entitle to 1/3rd share, Plaintiff father 1/3rd share and Defendant is entitle for 1/3rd share. Meanwhile Defendant son filed forged Gift Deed impleading himself in the partition suit claiming the property of his father as donor with forged documents. My sister son is not necessary party to the partition suit. Can impleadment petition will be allowed and if allowed how can it decide the title of suit property after after declaration of shares in preliminary decree.
Please kindly advise what will be result of my preliminary decree when it has attained finality after Supreme Court confirming my preliminary decree.
M.Satyanarayana
m.satyanarayana
25 May 2026 at 12:38
Plaintiff filed application for final decree and metes and bound. Property is owned by plaintiff ymother and defendant is daughter( sister to plaintiff) . Rights have been declared by preliminary decree . Plaintiff is entitle to 1/3rd share, Plaintiff father 1/3rd share and Defendant is entitle for 1/3rd share. Meanwhile Defendant son filed forged Gift Deed impleading himself in the partition suit claiming the property of his father as donor with forged documents. My sister son is not necessary party to the partition suit. Can impleadment petition will be allowed and if allowed how can it decide the title of suit property after after declaration of shares in preliminary decree.
Please kindly advise what will be result of my preliminary decree when it has attained finality after Supreme Court confirming my preliminary decree.
M.Satyanarayana
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Property ownership
Respected Sir/madam,
My relative who lives in a village is retired from the Indian Army and has purchased a home in the name of his wife, but the home was financed by a bank, and he has paid EMI every month from his bank account. The wife of my relative ran away from another man and lives with him. In this case how will he get the ownership of the home that is registered in his wife's name? But the payment is given by him. What are the legal remedies available to him?
Please guide
Thanks & regards,
Rohit Shukla