Amit
12 September 2024 at 11:18
I had filed a RTI to check if a case has been filed against my family members by a company. The RTI was rejected with the following reasons
1. The information asked for cannot be supplied due to following
reasons:-
A. Due to non-existence of the data sought by you, as per record, in
CMIS entries in the website the same cannot be provided.
B. The PIO is not supposed to create, collect or collate any information.
C.Under the RTI Act "information" is defined under Section 2 (f). This
definition shows that an applicant under Section 6 of the RTI Act can get
any information which is already in existence and accessible to the public
authority under law.
2. As per Section 19 of the Right to Information Act, 2005, you may file an
appeal to the Appellate Authority, Principal Registrar, High Court of M.P.,
Bench at Indore within 30 days of the receipt of this order.
I have checked the same online and found no record. I wanted proof of the same and thus filed a RTI.
Please guide how to get the same
Ananda
12 September 2024 at 00:28
Sirs,
If a Person purchases a property in his name and after few years Person GIFTS (REGISTERED) to his Parent for some reasons.
Later after few years if that Parent expires, can the Person file suit for declaration under benami? As per my understanding benami is when your fund the purchase under a different name. In this case it is claiming a gifted property after demise.
There are other legal heirs.
thanks
A
Ananda
12 September 2024 at 00:25
Sirs,
If a Person purchases a property in his name and after few years Person GIFTS (REGISTERED) to his Parent for some reasons.
Later after few years if that Parent expires, can the Person file suit for declaration under benami? As per my understanding benami is when your fund the purchase under a different name. In this case it is claiming a gifted property after demise.
There are other legal heirs.
thanks
A
irfan
11 September 2024 at 11:15
Dear Sir/Madam,
I hope this message finds you well. I resigned from my job due to a dispute over leave taken for health reasons, and I have been searching for a new job for the past two months. Unfortunately, I have not secured any employment yet and I am currently serving my last month with the company.
I have a car loan with the bank and a good credit record. However, as I will not be receiving a salary this month, I am concerned that this may negatively affect my credit score and result in recovery agents contacting me.
I would like to inquire if there is any provision to request the bank to defer my loan payments for three months. Once I secure a new job, I will be able to resume my EMI payments.
I would greatly appreciate your swift response and suggestions in this matter.
Thanks and Regards
Irfan Mulla
Anonymous
05 September 2024 at 19:58
Sunil Roy, a 22-year-old university student from Kolkata, participated in a peaceful protest for better environmental protection. The protest was non-violent, but Sunil was arrested and charged with sedition under the old laws, which accused him of trying to incite unrest. Sunil was surprised by the charges, as he believed he was just exercising his right to protest peacefully. Sunil’s trial has been going on for some time, causing him to miss classes and exams. His professors and friends support him, saying he’s committed to peaceful activism. However, the prosecution claims that the protest was meant to disrupt public order, justifying the sedition charges. Sunil’s legal team is now asking for the charges to be dropped under the new BSA rules, arguing that he was peacefully protesting and didn’t do anything wrong. Additionally, under the Bhartiya Nyaya Samithi (BNSS), minor offenses like Sunil’s should be resolved within six months to avoid longterm harm to individuals charged with nonviolent acts.
Anonymous
05 September 2024 at 19:50
Priya Mehta, a 38-year-old real estate developer from Mumbai, has been in the business for over 15 years. A few years ago, she was accused of illegally taking over government land and selling it to private buyers for a big profit. The land was supposed to be used for a public housing project, but Priya’s company allegedly falsified documents to make it seem privately owned. As a result, the government filed a case against her under old laws, accusing her of land grabbing and fraud. Priya denies the accusations, saying she bought the land legally and that the issue is due to poor government records. Since the case began, her business has suffered, and she’s lost investors due to the negative publicity. The prosecution argues that Priya’s actions were serious, as the land was meant for public use. Can Priya’s case be reclassified under the new Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and resolved through a BNSS mediation process? The prosecution insists she should be punished under the old laws, without the benefits of mediation. Should Priya be allowed to settle her case through mediation, or should she face the full force of the traditional trial process?
Anonymous
05 September 2024 at 18:49
(my brother-in-law) Anil Kumar, a 30-year-old accountant, has worked at a construction company in Dehradun for seven years. He is the main provider for his family, which includes his wife, two children, and his elderly parents. Recently, Anil was accused of stealing money from his employer by transferring small amounts over time. The company claims he embezzled a large sum of money over two years, leading to his arrest. Anil says it was a mistake in the accounting software and denies the allegations. Anil was denied bail because, under the old laws, his crime was considered non-bailable. Since his arrest, his family has struggled financially, and his reputation in the community has suffered. Anil has no previous records and he is the sole bread earner of the family. How does the new law impact Anil’s bail application? Can his lawyer convince the judge to release him under the new guidelines, given his nonviolent nature and family responsibilities? What factors must the court consider before deciding on bail under the BSA?
Anonymous
05 September 2024 at 18:24
Meena Sharma is a well-known editor in a monthly magazine from Delhi who built her reputation by investigating corruption. A few years ago, she wrote a series of articles accusing a politician, of misusing public funds for his personal benefit. Meena’s reports stirred up controversy, with many people discussing the corruption claims she made. But the politician denied all the accusations and filed a defamation lawsuit against Meena, claiming that her articles were false and damaging to his reputation. This lawsuit has been dragging on for three years, with no solution in sight because the courts are overloaded and keep delaying the hearings. Meena’s career has suffered during this time. Some people question her credibility, and it’s been hard for her to get work as an editor because of the ongoing case. And the legal team of the politician is demanding a large sum of money from Meena, claiming her articles damaged his political career. Meena’s legal team argues that her case should be transferred to the BNSS’s fasttrack courts, so the matter can be resolved quickly. The politician’s lawyers, however, believe that the defamation case should proceed as per the usual court timeline. What can be done?
Anonymous
05 September 2024 at 16:53
My name is Sunita Sharma, and I'm a 40-year-old homemaker from a small village. In our village, standing up for what's right is important, but many of us don’t know much about our legal rights. We face issues like domestic violence, land disputes, and people being denied what they deserve, but we’re often lost when it comes to finding help. I remember when I was denied my share of inherited property; I didn’t know where to turn or what to do. I’ve seen this happen to so many people in our community, and it’s heartbreaking because we just don’t have the knowledge or resources to fight back. I’m also wondering if the BNS will organize workshops or camps in our village, where legal experts can come and talk to us directly, answer our questions, and guide us on what to do. It would be great if they could send mobile vans with legal resources to our village, so we don’t have to travel far to get help. Will the BNS work with local NGOs and community leaders to make sure everyone gets the information they need?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
How to take objection to allow papers filed by defendant
Res Sir
I'm plaintiff in civil suit and after verification matter posted for cross of defendant witness on exhibit filed by him.cross examination yet pending
But after three years he was filed set of documents with out mentioned reason of delay, I have taken objection for the same but same is allowed by CJSD
And in my absence exhibit marked to document filed by defendant while verious documents are not orginal only true copy submitted and court marked as exhibit on my absence
Now I want to point out whether matter already posted for cross, no reason to allow documents and more over instead of orginal how exhibit marked
Can I file application u/s 114 cpc
Pls guide as I'm party in person appears as plaintiff
Thankyou