Anonymous
21 August 2026 at 15:42
Sir,
I borrowed a sum of 4 lakhs from private money lender and paying interest regularly. After one year, i pledged jewels of 45 grams at the money lender separately and the lender assured me there is no connection for already borrowed money. Now while takeback my jewels, the lender refused to give the jewels and stated that unless repayment of borrowed money completed. The jewels need for family function and now i have money only for takeback of jewels. I also assured to repay my borrowed money in six month period and he refused. Please guide me in this matter.
Guru
05 August 2026 at 15:55
Hello sir , parition deed suite is running , so far 9 hearing is completed and in last hearing daily order is issue frame . but 2 days ago we came to know that defandants/respondant sold one of the property in January-2026 which is menyioned under schedule in the suite/plaint documents . may I know what are solution now for us ? thank you .
Anonymous
03 August 2026 at 19:17
I am in Tamilanadu. My wife inherited a land owned by her late mother that has no path access. The land is in tha back portion of a land owned by her close relative that has road access. But her relative wont give pathway through their land. Is there a way to get pathway by approaching court? If so please reply.
Rohit Shukla
21 July 2026 at 11:08
Respected Sir/madam,
My relative who lives in a village is retired from the Indian Army and has purchased a home in the name of his wife, but the home was financed by a bank, and he has paid EMI every month from his bank account. The wife of my relative ran away from another man and lives with him. In this case how will he get the ownership of the home that is registered in his wife's name? But the payment is given by him. What are the legal remedies available to him?
Please guide
Thanks & regards,
Rohit Shukla
Anonymous
16 July 2026 at 15:52
The Central List of Other Backward Classes for Rajasthan, published by the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC), mentions “Kalal (Tak)” at Entry No. 25. I belong to the Kalal community but do not belong to the Tak sub-caste, nor do I use Tak as my surname or identify it as a synonym of my community.
The SDM Office, Dhariyawad, has taken the view that I must prove that I belong to the Tak sub-caste/synonym in order to be issued a Central OBC Certificate. Since I am not a member of the Tak sub-caste, I am unable to produce such proof.
However, I rely upon NCBC Letter No. 12011/9/94-BCC, which provides that communities included in both the Mandal Commission List and the State OBC List are deemed to be included in the Central OBC List. The Kalal community is included at Entry No. 69 of the Mandal Commission (Mandal Commission Report) List and at Entry No. 32 of the Rajasthan State OBC List.
Further, I have obtained an RTI reply showing that, in another district of Rajasthan, a person belonging to the Kalal community was issued a Central OBC Certificate without being required to furnish proof of belonging to the Tak sub-caste.
In these circumstances, I seek legal guidance on whether the SDM can lawfully insist on proof of the Tak sub-caste merely because Entry No. 25 of the Central OBC List is described as “Kalal (Tak)”, despite the above records and the RTI evidence showing a different administrative practice.
Jasvinder
06 July 2026 at 21:38
A pvt ltd company have 2 director.
One director on behalf of company filed a injuction suit in civil court against me.
After much up and down in one other case between these 2 director of company one director other than who file injuction, given statement in high court that he had given resignation long back before this injuction suit and this director had no Locus standi to sue on behalf of pvt ltd company and this director who resign never stand in this injuction suit before the court.
When I came to know this I file o7r11 that this director had no locus standi to file any case in absence of resolution of board of director as Corum is not complete because of one director resignation and because of this no meeting can held and no resolution can be passed.
Am I right at this point.
Any case law.
Thanks in advance.
Anonymous
04 July 2026 at 10:03
Old debt existing of family industrial unit shutdown in 1997 bankrupt and taken over by ksfc.
KSFC is now spending notices saying to gurrantor old promoter to recover under section 32g of sfc act. Anyway they can issue a a state recovery certificate
a rastogi
06 June 2026 at 08:33
All hon'ble learned advocates,
Kindly suggest me on the below summarized matter, what should be done, I am worried about my heavy amount stuck in between..
CASE SUMMARY Parties:
-- Buyer/Consignee: Neeru Rastogi (India)
-- Seller/Shipper: DigiKey Electronics (USA)
-- Carrier: FedEx
Transaction:
-- Electronics order placed with DigiKey.
-- Total order value approximately INR 47,000.
-- Shortly after placing the order, I realized that the wrong product variant had been selected.
Key Facts:
1. Before shipment movement started even before allocating assigning AWB Number, I notified both DigiKey and FedEx that I did not want the shipment and requested Return to Sender (RTS).
2. On 18 May 2026, I emailed FedEx requesting:
-- Refusal of shipment,
-- No customs clearance,
-- No BOE filing,
-- Return to Sender (RTS).
3. On 18 May 2026, I also emailed DigiKey requesting RTS and explaining that the order contained the wrong item.
4. Despite these communications, the shipment continued to move through the FedEx network and eventually arrived in India.
5. I repeatedly informed FedEx that:
-- I refused delivery,
-- I would not provide KYC,
-- I would not authorize BOE filing,
-- I wanted RTS.
6. DigiKey later confirmed in writing: "I have sent a request to FedEx and have asked them to return the package to us."
7. FedEx subsequently created multiple case numbers and confirmed that RTS-related requests were under review.
8. FedEx later requested:
-- An abandonment/refusal letter from me,
-- An RTS declaration letter from DigiKey addressed to Customs,
-- DigiKey's FedEx account details for billing RTS charges.
9. DigiKey later stated that they could not share internal RTS details and also indicated that return may not be possible because the shipment had reached India Customs.
10. As of the latest communication:
-- Shipment has not been delivered to me.
-- I have not accepted the shipment.
-- I have not submitted KYC.
-- I have not authorized BOE filing.
-- No final written RTS approval or rejection has been communicated.
-- No final disposition of the shipment has been communicated since 17 days approximately.
Issues Requiring Legal Opinion:
1. What are my rights after notifying both seller and carrier of refusal before shipment movement/early transit?
2. Can DigiKey require me to accept delivery before allowing a return when RTS was requested before delivery?
3. If RTS is ultimately denied, who bears responsibility for costs incurred after repeated refusal notices?
4. If the shipment is abandoned, returned, or otherwise disposed of, what refund rights do I have?
5. Does the early refusal communication affect liability for shipping, customs, restocking, or return charges?
6. What consumer-protection remedies are available if the matter remains unresolved and funds remain blocked?
Documents Available:
-- Emails to DigiKey requesting RTS.
-- Emails to FedEx requesting refusal and RTS.
-- DigiKey emails confirming RTS request to FedEx.
-- FedEx case references and responses.
-- Shipment tracking history.
Regards.
Ankur
a rastogi
04 June 2026 at 20:29
All hon'ble learned advocates,
Kindly suggest me on the below summarized matter, what should be done, I am worried about my heavy amount stuck in between..
CASE SUMMARY
Parties:
-- Buyer/Consignee: Neeru Rastogi (India)
-- Seller/Shipper: DigiKey Electronics (USA)
-- Carrier: FedEx
Transaction:
-- Electronics order placed with DigiKey.
-- Total order value approximately INR 47,000.
-- Shortly after placing the order, I realized that the wrong product variant had been selected.
Key Facts:
1. Before shipment movement, I notified both DigiKey and FedEx that I did not want the shipment and requested Return to Sender (RTS).
2. On 18 May 2026, I emailed FedEx requesting:
-- Refusal of shipment,
-- No customs clearance,
-- No BOE filing,
-- Return to Sender (RTS).
3. On 18 May 2026, I also emailed DigiKey requesting RTS and explaining that the order contained the wrong item.
4. Despite these communications, the shipment continued to move through the FedEx network and eventually arrived in India.
5. I repeatedly informed FedEx that:
-- I refused delivery,
-- I would not provide KYC,
-- I would not authorize BOE filing,
-- I wanted RTS.
6. DigiKey later confirmed in writing:
"I have sent a request to FedEx and have asked them to return the package to us."
7. FedEx subsequently created multiple case numbers and confirmed that RTS-related requests were under review.
8. FedEx later requested:
-- An abandonment/refusal letter from me,
-- An RTS declaration letter from DigiKey addressed to Customs,
-- DigiKey's FedEx account details for billing RTS charges.
9. DigiKey later stated that they could not share internal RTS details and also indicated that return may not be possible because the shipment had reached India Customs.
10. As of the latest communication:
-- Shipment has not been delivered to me.
-- I have not accepted the shipment.
-- I have not submitted KYC.
-- I have not authorized BOE filing.
-- No final written RTS approval or rejection has been communicated.
-- No final disposition of the shipment has been communicated.
Issues Requiring Legal Opinion:
1. What are my rights after notifying both seller and carrier of refusal before shipment movement/early transit?
2. Can DigiKey require me to accept delivery before allowing a return when RTS was requested before delivery?
3. If RTS is ultimately denied, who bears responsibility for costs incurred after repeated refusal notices?
4. If the shipment is abandoned, returned, or otherwise disposed of, what refund rights do I have?
5. Does the early refusal communication affect liability for shipping, customs, restocking, or return charges?
6. What consumer-protection remedies are available if the matter remains unresolved and funds remain blocked?
Documents Available:
-- Emails to DigiKey requesting RTS.
-- Emails to FedEx requesting refusal and RTS.
-- DigiKey emails confirming RTS request to FedEx.
-- FedEx case references and responses.
-- Shipment tracking history.
Regards.
Ankur
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Share of already partitioned property
If Coparcner property of Ancestral agricultural land of 12 Acres in name of my Paternal grandfather already divided between 4 family members by my paternal grandfather. And that was divided among my Grandfather himself, Grandmother, My father & and my real uncle(each got 3 acres in their name). My Grandfather was not having any daughters only having 2 sons.
Now My Father & mother died in accident leaving behind my unmarried sister of 23 years and me 21 years. But My grandmother still alive.
As per Hindu succession act section 6 and subsection-3 below clearly states that Intrest of Hindu who died, calculated first by using principle of notional Partition. And that share furthershall devolve by testamentary or intestate succession, as the case may be, under this Act and not by survivorship.
As per this grandmother should get share in below fashion utilzing subsection 3 of section 6 of Hindu succession act and applying points A,B,C in subsection 3 in section 6.
In this example coparcener property of 3 acres in father's name will be divided applying Notional partition to calculate intrest of father who died. While doing this me,my sister and father assuming alive just before death(as per Notional Partition) will get 3 equal share of 1 acre each.This notional partition among coparcener is done by applying points A,B,C per this section 6 & subsection-3.
Then further that 1 acre in intrest of my father will be divided among class 1 heirs as per succession (as will is not there).So grandmother will get 1/3 acres,additionally me will get additional 1/3 acres apart of original 1 acres.Likewse my sister like me.
Please clarify is it correct division?
As Grandmother already hold 3 acres after original partition.And when 3 acres moved ony father's name after partion. That is his separate property and joint status is servered from unity to individual and all original coparcener has recived their share and their intrest crystallised.
And further they will not be entitled in share out of remaining property's partition.(But can get as legal heir through succession).
But when and my sister born we become coparcener along with my father and property of 3 acres become coparcener property again.