LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   08 September 2022 at 17:38

Personal loan hdfc bank

Sir
In the year 2016 september my father took 7lakhs personal loan from hdfc bank.after four months that is february 2017 my father died because of heart attack.my father taken insurance policy for this loan,but the bank is saying the policy is only for accidental policy.my mother also died recently in july 2020.now the bank advocates are sending notices to me to repay the loan.
Please suggest me what i have to do

Guru   07 September 2022 at 02:45

Penalty other than loss compensation.

dear sir, does consumer court have powers to put penalty along with loss compensation order ?

means , can we claim penalty in the consumer court ? that we agreed in the agreement in case of fail of the agreement by other party.

case that I facing is belongs to construction agreement with contractor . Thank you .

Swaty Gupta   06 September 2022 at 10:42

Perjury in court

Dear experts,
In a case involving my family property, the opposite party secured favorable judgement by submitting false affidavits and claims. We couldn't prove it otherwise as we couldn't find evidence to counter it. After judgement, we found ample and solid evidence to counter all their lies and to prove that judgement was obtained on basis of lies in court.
What are our options to get the judgement reconsidered and/or to file perjury against the opposite party.
Regards
Vinay Gupta

Guru   05 September 2022 at 14:40

Without lawyer.

Hello sir , can I put the case in court without lawyer . Thank you .

Anonymous   04 September 2022 at 20:33

Forcible acts of endowment employees and crooked archaka

A man krishna rao running small shop since 50 years, adjacent to satyanarayana swami temple compound wall, which has been let to him by one Gorongo Goudo and said goudo was died 30 years back.  None of the archaka has absolute right and title over the temple, cases run between archaks confirmed the same, lower and senior division courts dismissed their suits stating they do not have any right.  Even said temple is not under Endowment Department. One archaka srinivas with crooked mentality colluded with staff of Endowments department, trying to demolish shop of petty vendor Krishna Rao by forcibly evicting him, and to ruine his livelyhood as  Krishna Rao is paying rentals to other archaka Pintu.

said archaka Srinivas approached Dist. Legal Services authority, submitted a representation to order for eviction of shop and  mentioning  the Dist. Collector, Municipal Commision etc., as respondents. Dist.Legal Services Committee orally asking Krishna Rao to vacate the shop.  If it happens so, petty vendors family suffer starvation.  

issue is pending with Dist Legal Services Authority, but the Endowments Department staff threatning the Petty Vendor of disposession and throwing out the goods in the shop.

How said petty vendor can get help by approaching court, can he file a suit for injunction against the endowment authorities and archaka srinivas to restrict their forcible activities. Petty Vendor needs immediate help for survival 

Anonymous   03 September 2022 at 20:58

Forcible acts of endowment employees and crooked archaka

Respected Members Good evening

Please guide me in the following

A man krishna rao running small shop since 50 years, adjacent to satyanarayana swami temple compound wall, which has been let to him by one Gorongo Goudo and said goudo was died 30 years back. 

Infact Hanumanth bukta was heridatory trustee of the private temple, archakas appointed by their ancestrals occupied the temple then said Hanumanth bukta filed suit in 1908 for posession inrespect of temple and won the case. subsequently with interference of locals, entered into agreement with archakas gouranga panda and other and handed over the diety and other articles, with an understanding that archaks should return the same whenevery asked by the Hanumanth bukta or his family.  after the death of said hanumanth bukta, the family members of archakas settled the temple properties among themselves without any right.  later there were cases among the archakas regarding the right over the temple in the year 1998 and 2001 & 2010 and all were dismissed. Lower court found that parties to suits do not have right over the temple, given a direction to Assistant Commissioner Endowments to take over the same. The order of the lower court challenged in appeal and in said appeal the appellate court deleted the part of lower courts order directing the Asst. Endowments Commissiioner "to hand over the posession" has been deleted. Hence the Endowments dept. nothing to do with said temple. 

As per the understanings between the families of archakas.....four families collecting the rentals of four shops adjacent to compound wall of the temple.

Recently one of the archaka hardly trying to eliminate the others.....gathered some local people, injucted them to widen the main entrance (simhadwara of the temple). So that the shop under the supervision of another archaka can easily be removed. On the other side there was shop under the supervision of said archaka, but with his cunning nature he left the area of his shop, spreaded construction towards the area of the shop under the super vision of another archaka, executed his plan successfully, constructed dwaram with malafied intention.. Colluded with the staff of Endowments Dept. harassing the Petty Vendor. 

approached Dist.legal Services authority, praying to remove / vacate the shop by submitting a representation mentioning the Municipal commissioner, Dist.Collector and Endowments Dept as respondents, praying to direct the authorities to remove the shop.  the same is violative and against to right of living.  Repeatedly the Endowments staff harassing the petty shop owner to vacate and threatning that they will evict and throw the goods forcibly.  Infact said temple is not under the Endowments Department, but unlawfully interfering in the issue to support the archaka, locked the shop and tried to demolish the structure, who is a forcible man. other departments having careful inquiry kept quite in the issue. Police did not given support to the Petty Vendor, but orally suggested the Endowments staff not to do so without any right.

Devotees are not insisting for widening the existing door, but the crooked mentality archaka pinching some locals in his support and to take legal shelter approached Dist.Legal Services Authority with the help of some of Court Staff. 

issue is pending with Dist Legal Services Authority

Dist.Legal Services Authority orally asking the petty vendor to vacate the shop without going through facts. Said Petty vendor was feared and disturbed. If he vacates the shop his family will suffer on roads for livelihood.

How said petty vendor can get help by approaching court, can he file a suit for injunction against the endowment authorities and archaka to restrict their forcible activities. Petty Vendor needs immediate help for survival

Anonymous   03 September 2022 at 20:47

Registration of landed property - unregistered agreement

Mr. Abdul contacted Smt. Mohini to purchase his land, both entered into agreement for Rs. 5 lakhs (un-registered) witnessed by Mr. Kiran and Smt. Gowri. Abdul requested the Vendee to give maxm amount of Rs. 4lakhs as he was in dire need of money. After receipt of said money he left to his native place in Krishna District. Did not turning up to take balance amount and registration.
Smt. Mohini requested many times and got served legal notice to Abdul, and he refused. Then Smt. Mohini Sent notices to witnesses of the transaction Mr. Kiran and Smt. Gowri, asking them to suggest the Vendor to complete the transaction at the sooner, they too refused to receive the notices.
The Vendee Smt. Mohini was under loss and stress due the the act of the Vendor.

How Can she get register the site in her name
under what provisions of law she can approach the court of law and against whom Smt. Mohini can sue for remedy

NAGARAJ   03 September 2022 at 18:03

Jurisdiction to file declaration suit for name change

my client name is manjula she was studied at shivmogga till 10th class and now her name changed as vinutha in her adhaar card, present adhaar card address is stands at bangalore.. shall i file declaration suit for name change at bangalore jurisdiction courts...?

Thanks for ur precious reply.

chirag patel   02 September 2022 at 19:02

Non compliance of supreme court order in contempt petition

Supreme Court of India has in its judgement given some directions to the govt. organisation within the deadline date. Organisation has not complied with the order and two days have passed. what is the remedy now available with the petitioner. can we file and police complaint for non compliance or we have to again file contempt of court ? Please suggest appropriate remedy now.

Anonymous   02 September 2022 at 16:45

Loa suit dismissed by high court . what next?

We're are 5 legal heirs in property of late father who died intestate in 1996.
Two legal heirs involved in father's prop. stock broking business didn't clear the objection of high court which asked for dividend details on the list of shares submitted to court. They had managed to convince father to open joint account for the business and pocketed the dividends running in to lacs of rupees.
What options the 3 legal heirs have for getting their share?