In the year 2019, I had to pay 15 lakh rupees to a person as per an agreement that I can pay 6000 rupees per month in 20 years and for that I will give 30% of my property as security and I will return the security once the entire amount is paid. But due to the crisis during Corona, I have not been able to pay the monthly amount of 6000 rupees for the last two years. So if this party files a civil case on my behalf now, will my property be confiscated? Can they claim only 30% as per agreement? The value of the property is now less compared to the price of the property and the number to pay. So will they be able to attach my remaining 70% through the court? Can I get a stay from the court for not being able to return due to the corona crisis? How best to deal with this case?
I'm defendant in money recovery case. But complainant has to pay me money in some other matter. Hence I have not paid him. Can I take that defense stating that he is due to me which is more than the suit filed amount. I can submit documents pertaining to defense.
Dear Experts,
My uncle purchased three plots in a panchayat property @2015 in Hosur.Later in 2017, the developer applied for HNTDA approval and changed the design of all the property. My uncle with other three buyers filed a writ petition in Madras HC. Due course one of the petitioner was expired last year.Should we proceed with the existing case or should we notpress and file a fresh petition?
Illiterate Person told wrong Year, age at Cross Examination in front Judge, Can Correct it at the time of
argument.
I'm defendant in money recovery case. But complainant has to pay me money in some other matter. Hence I have not paid him. Can I take that defense stating that he is due to me more than this amount. I can submit documents pertaining to defense.
Hello,
In the Civil Suit decided earlier, we had given a number of citations from the SC and various HCs, during the oral arguments, and the case was 100% in our favour, as such. (The citations were also present in written arguments/submissions, submitted later on plain paper for the court's reference)
The suit was still decided against us, and our citations are not mentioned in the judgment, and heavy costs have been awarded to the other party.
• For filing the Civil Appeal, is there a way to have the court fees (in lakhs) waived off, considering we had already given the citations earlier, but they stood ignored, and now we have to file an appeal, for no fault of ours?
Sorry for being anonymous, but it is important.
Corruption in judiciary is opaque to many but it is transperant to the professionals. In 2002, smt Birudha RajaRatnam,a fakeSC got appointed as Telugu Lecturer in Andhra Saraswata Parishad in SC woman reserved category. She was caught many times but managed SW officials all times. In 2011, Hyd Dist collector sri Ntarajan Gulzar caught& astonished to find - How can a demised mother have different caste children in caught FakeSC cases? Report was most impeccable. He removed her based on reports from SW,RDO&CVC. But,she managed STAY using senior counsel sri S Niranjan Reddy in Hyd HC. She is 3rd wife to sri Sarikonda PapaRaju of MIDHANI. She spoofs a lot with lies& soliloquy  so much that you will forget to verify & validate these basic 420 facts. She got UGC NET papers leaked in 2000 to pass that exam with fakeSC papers otherwise she failed 10th class six times& later passed with malpractice in BA&MA from Dr BR Ambedkar Open University Distance education,Hyd. Cousin Sai Raju committed suicide in 2019. He gave leaked UGC 2000 papers, but got intimidated by her hired Advocates during her Germany STAY for one year. No hearing took place during her Germany STAY (Oct19-Sep19). All knew tricks played &managed in HC in registry, desk clerk. Brbes make many slaves. She managed TSP college staff, CCE, SW dept, HC Judges, Police nicely for past 20yrs to continue in job & muck salary. Judges used their prerogative powers to issue STAY orders twice to blatantly stopped& denied Telangana State Govt replace her with genuine SC candidate. Nexus among PP, Advocates was seen. Filmy Dialogues like Bail/STAY is right. Jail is exceptional, heavens are not falling are routine. STAY orders to caught fakeSC employees is also routine. Next, infructuous, frivolous, ne words are commonly used vocabulary. For bribes, Adjudication is subjected to subjugation..its true. When PP doesn't object to STAY,the Judge dangles to issue STAY.  No more hearing afterwards even though listed many times. Its manipulation. Case will be made oblivious steadily after 10 yrs. It is routine collective drama played with soliloquy of hired Advocates, PP, Judges. Who doesn't  know? The judiciary corruption is opaque to others but not to the professionals. Trick to deceive was that Demised mother had SC surname(Kavali) and brought up by her. It was a concocted story that continued with cavil arguments. Muck salary & F*ck social justice as Policy was adopted. Treason & Tyranny can be traced at every stage. Uco Bank & HDFC banks gave 16&25 lakh personal loans to her to satisfy whims& fancies of her team in making luxury foreign trips& bribes to all. Fun is - A substantial evidence(again Fake SC) was nicely generated by her Advocate to deceive courts & nation. Two CC orders were issued to IAS officers to reinstated her &disburse salary speaking volumes of corruption, Hegemony of Judges over IAS officers. Natural Justice clause was used to fool&trample social justice. Submitted investigation reports, removal orders, G.O for removal were set aside for issuing 2 STAY orders. Ref TS state G.O 13 of 2016 dt 27.04.2016, Hyd HC. WP16793/2016, CC WP3754/2012, CC orders, WP16793/2016, WVMP2102/2016 and so on. Aplenty of Lies, Perjury,suborning perjury, intimidating & suicide instigation, fabricated evidence were regular crimes enacted& carried by her Advocates.Stigma in Judges was that they never summoned daughters, in laws, other siblings. Hired Advocates quelled full family details to suit acquittal. Because all are non-SC. Let us see... What is mentioned in STAY orders? Not looking into merits in the case, Refraining from merits in the case, Court has not expressed any opinion on submitted substantial evidence(fake). All know how Ratnam nags Advocates 24X7 to counter any eventualities. Venal Police seized suicide note&mobile phones of step daughter to defunct them as they are known to destroy evidence if not fetching any bribes. The Advocate dictated 2 page each complaint to sri PapaRaju& Jnaneswar to nullify suicide basic truth. Advocates mind spells...here. Hand writing does not belong to slain daughter,  if at all written, it was forcefully got written, by husband, check cctv as he strangled& hanged later, CDR to calls, Post morten for patches on body and FSL reports for hand writing clues to fix him. Evil brain was of her criminal lawyers, which was scanned. Advocate asked polarised people to exult son in law infront of Police to show off their non involvement in instigation. Venal Police never introspect their own records-10th std. COUNTER ATTACK - Venal judges support fakeSC employee by warning IAS officers with CC orders (reverse attack), Venal Police threaten with IPC306 case against son in law(Reverse attack) despite reports&  suicide note blame the fakeSC woman& Birudha RajaRatnam& & husband sarikonda PapaRaju&,who retired from Midhani,Hyd. Also, Hyd Police& HC judiciary were scramblimg under incompetence & corruption as seen. NO JUSTICE. .
I am carrying valid driving license, RC and valid third party insurance at the time of accident. Police filed IPC 338 and victim's family filed MACT Claim under MV ACT 166, 163A, 140C against me and my insurer seeking compensation of 95 lakhs.
IPC 338 is still pending in criminal court and is not yet proved.
Incase of MACT if in case judge announces a compensation of 95 lakhs, who is liable to pay the compensation ? Me as car owner/driver or insurance company ?
Respected Experts
One Smt. Sanjana has purchased landed property in 2013 and 2021. Her husband died during covid pandamic. On west side of said one medical practitioner Mr. Krshna, is having his hospital. In the last month said Mr. Krishna has occupied a part of land owned by Smt. Sanjana and started constructing foundations with a measurement of 20x50feet without having any right or consulatation.
Immediately on knowing the same Smt. Sanjana sought the help of village elders, asked said Mr. Krishna not to do any further construction. Then he admitted his occupation and demanded to sell said land to him, Smt. Sanjana rejected said forcible proposal. After few days again he started constructing. Now he raised foundations upto 5 feet hight.
In this situation how Smt. Sanjana can get help through court, by what provisions
Shall she ask court to demolish the foundations ? If so under what provision
Please guide in this aspect
Stay of decree for permanent injunction
Respected experts,
A decree was passed in a suit filed by plaintiff granting permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of suit schedule immovable property, on contest.
Now, defendant preferred an appeal along with application under Order 41 rule 5 cpc seeking stay of execution of the said decree. Is it maintainable?
Pls give your valuable inputs. Thanks in advance.