Dear Sir/Madam,
Since 2018, I have pending MCOP case in Taluk court with Subordinate Judge in TamilNadu. My dad met with accident in Nov 2017 and case filed in 2018. There is no representation from Insurance company side and so , every time the case will postponed to succeeding month for next hearing and remarked as "Ex-Parte Evidence" , It continued for 3 years as "Ex-Parte" and we stressed our lawyer to request the court to close it as Ex-Parte. But our lawyers shows Interest to go for One time settlement with the IFFCO Tokyo Insurance company. Since, the Insurance Company was ready to pay only Rs.2,50,000/- we didn't accept their proposal. After a long struggle with our lawyers , they submitted Ex-parte Evidence and now the status of the case shows as "ORDER" and next hearing ( ex parte order date ) will be 31/10/2022. My queries are :
1. We have demanded 50 Lakhs as compensation in the Affidavit with court. Since the court is about to pronounce its order as Ex_Parte closure on 31 Oct 2022, can I get the order for 50 lakhs or reduced amount ?
2. If once, the case has been closed for Ex-Parte, for sure Insurance Company will request the court and the court will re-open the case? AM I need to do anything from my part to expedite the case during the time of re-opening ?
3. My dad age is 68 as on Nov 2017 and he is not an income tax assessee, Agricultural Income is only source of Income. What would be the minimum and maximum compensation I can expect normally for MCOP ?
4. Do we have any recent case laws with higher amount awarded for MCOP Case ? can I refer the same for my MCOP during appeal If I am not satisfied with Taluk court final Judgement?
5.I have spent around 1 Lakhs for hospital medical treatment during the admission. Can I claim it separately from Insurance company as addition to Compensation ? or will it be included in the threshold of MCOP compensation limit ?
Thanks id Advance for your reply
I gave an interview recently and after that I got an email with a list of documents the company requires, before giving me an offer letter. In that list is a requirement for Police Verification. I communicated with the company to provide me with a letter stating that the company requires a Police Verification. The HR said, it is company policy that they will not be issuing any letter on their letterhead for a person who is not an employee.
The Police require a letter from the company asking for a Police verification(compulsory document, even mentioned on the website), but the company is refusing to give a letter on the basis that it has not yet given me an offer letter.
I have 2 questions...
1. Can a Police Verification be done without a letter from the Company hiring? Is there anything called a Police verification on an individual basis(the HR emailed me telling me I should do this, even though the website for Police Verification does not have an option for this)?
2. What alternative if any exists?
I have read through a few documents and I cannot find a way out. Requesting your help.
Sir,
I want to take divorce what are the step should i have to follow before processing.
Hello lawyers the plot I live in was purchased along with a colleague who sold it last year. Now the new residents are asking us for NOC but my mother refused as we dont know of their income source.
So they came at our house and threatened my mother saying they would demolish a part of our house and they are claiming that we have encorached the land. The wall is not built yet and we have only made a temporary boundary of barbed wires they are refusing the intervention of revenue department. Also their sale deed is in the name of another (father)and 7/12 in the name of another (the son and one other person) is it possible in maharashtra. What should we do?
Hi, would need a genuine advice regarding the subject line:
1. We are Hindu Undivided Family, property where the tower is located is a self acquired property by my mother and she passed away intestate in Feb 2016
2. I'm the only child to my mother, property has been moved in my name after my father's demise in Aug 2019
3. My mother entered into an agreement with Reliance Infratel Ltd (earlier led by MD Anil Ambani) now god knows who it is for a period of 15 years starting Aug 2008
4. After multiple reminders, phone conversations etc and they fail to clear the arrears of rent + remove the tower (as its non operative any more). Rental agreement will expire on Aug 2023
5. Agreement terms and conditions are one sided which was executed with my mother during Aug 2008
6. Account to where rent was credited is still active and the account was in my mother's name earlier has been moved to my name now.
Questions:
1) Can I as the right legal owner of the property take the arrears of rent from Reliance Communications?
2) What are my options in getting my arrears of rent with interest paid
3) Should I take a legal route before the rental agreement expires or wait till it expires and then take seek remedy?
4) Tower and other assets are still on my property , once agreement expires what will happen to them? What if Reliance does not come forward to remove a dead weight on my property which is affecting my other tenants and building structure and strength is compromised.
5) What is the best way to get Reliance off my premises and me taking over the possession of the rented premises
Seek an expert's help as its causing enough financial distress and also jeopardizing the building safety and strength. Any additional details related to agreement if asked I can share it.
SIR, FOR SOME REASON THE GIFT DEED DOCUMENT WRITTEN CONTAINS MANY ERRORS,MISTAKES, MISSING MEASUREMENTS OF PROPERTY, TOTAL AREA EXTENT. ETC.
PROPERTY IS IN POSSESSION SINCE 1950 TILL PRESENT.
IT'S CONFUSING TO EXPLAIN IN WRITING, BUT EASIER TO EXPLAIN.
WOULD GREATLY APPRECIATE YOUR INPUT & GUIDANCE.
THANKS🙏🙇 NARENDRA
Initially My father had failed a suit for declaration and a permanent injunction suit against his 2 brothers. The property was mortgaged long back with one of the brothers.
Trail court decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff(my father) subject to redemption of a mortgage in favour of one of the brothers (Defendant 1)
Subsequently, Defendant 1 filed an appeal.
My father(Plaintiff) filed a separate new suit for redemption of a mortgage in trial court.
We also contested the same in the Appeal filed by Defendant. In the first appeal it was decreed fully in our original plaintiff's favour. It was held mortgage was redeemed as well.
In the second appeal filed by Defendant matter was remanded by High court for consideration of additional evidence filed by the defendant during the first appeal. Now after the matter is remaned to the trial court, the defendant is arguing plaintiff can not claim redemption of the mortgage since plaintiff has filed new suit for the mortgage of redemption and hence, the mortgage should be considered as not redeemed. However, the high court has remanded the matter only for the limited purpose of considering additional evidence.
Can you please suggest
I have given Rs. _ _ _ to XXX to start a business. The amount was paid by cheque. XXX has purchased a house with that money. I was occasionally used to live in that house. Now XXX want to sale the house & refused to pay my money back. I have forced to file FIR u/s 420 IPC. Thereafter XXX tell me that, since she couldn't refund my money she will transfer house in my name & handover possession of house to me.
All of a sudden XXX came & threatening me to vacate the house. I asked to refund my money or transfer house to me. But she refused both.
I inform the matter to local PS & they advised me to lodge FIR.
1) Can I file a civil suit for injunction & peaceful living in that house ?
2) Can I claim that property since market value of that house is already paid to XXX but XXX refused to transfer the house to me.
Can I file
Forcible enchroachment of land
Respected Experts
One Smt. Sanjana has purchased landed property in 2013 and 2021. Her husband died during covid pandamic. On west side of said one medical practitioner Mr. Krshna, is having his hospital. In the last month said Mr. Krishna has occupied a part of land owned by Smt. Sanjana and started constructing foundations with a measurement of 20x50feet without having any right or consulatation.
Immediately on knowing the same Smt. Sanjana sought the help of village elders, asked said Mr. Krishna not to do any further construction. Then he admitted his occupation and demanded to sell said land to him, Smt. Sanjana rejected said forcible proposal. After few days again he started constructing. Now he raised foundations upto 5 feet hight.
In this situation how Smt. Sanjana can get help through court, by what provisions
Shall she ask court to demolish the foundations ? If so under what provision
Please guide in this aspect