Sir we are from scheduled tribe category.. My father wants to give his property as gift deed to me.. But in this case is it required permission of collector under 73 AA??
WE HAVE FILED PETITION IN NCLAT IN APRIL 2022.PETITION NOT HEARD SINCE THAN.NO STAY GRANTED.APPEAL TO SUPREME COURT.SC GRANTED LEBERTY TO PRESS FOR THE INTERIM RELEIF.STILL NOT HEARD STATY PETITION OR HEARD FINAL PETITION. 2 IA FILED IN BETWEEN.NOT HEARD.MATTER IS BEING ADJOURNED TILL DATE ATLEAST 7/8 TIMES.THERE IS DEAD LOCK IN COMPANY AND ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR/JOINT SIGANTORY ARE NOT SIGNING CHEQUES FOR DAY TO DAY OPERSTION OF COMPANY SINCE LAST 2 MONTHS.NCLAT IS NOT GIVING DIRECTION ON IA FILED.
WHAT REMEDY WE HAVE IN LAW?
WHAT IS TIME LIMIT IN LAW TO DISPOSE THE APPEAL BY NCLAT?
Ownership of land has been decided in favour of Bombay Public Trust in Dec 2022. But the education society has been registered as a separate entity in 1979 in Karnataka 0n behalf of the trust and has been running a school. How does the Trust take control or exercise control over the society now after the verdict.
1. WHETHER THE F.I.RST INFORMATION REPORT POLICE STATION FOR OFFENSES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS OF THE SCINDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 ALONG WITH SECTIONS
OF THE TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS AND TISSUES ACT 1994; DESERVES TO BE QUASHED?
2. WHETHER THE INVESTIGATION PERTAINING TO THE F.I.RST INFORMATION REPORT POLICE STATION FOR OFFENSES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS OF THE TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS AND TISSUES ACT, 1994 DESERVES TO BE STAYED?
This case is all about organ transplantation similar to (RUBY HALL CLINIC CASE)
During the investigation, it was revealed that with the aid of a few middle-men terminating as agents, the forgery and superimposition in the government issued identity card was facilitated. Middlemen/agents were also arraigned in the F.I.R.
WHETHER THE - Circular/communication bearing no. 1441/health/directorate/2022, dated 30.11.2022, issued by the directorate of health services, that "the hospitals shall examine and certify that the documents submitted by the donors and the donee are genuine, also that there is no financial transaction involved and that the donor's consent for transplant is based on his or her free will, a certificate to that effect shall be endorsed under the seal and signature of the registered hospital's dean or medical head. The hospital should complete this exercise before forwarding applications and papers to the state government-based regional authorization committee, metropolis. If the circular is breached, penal consequences will be attracted." IS ULTRA VIRES TO THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND PROVISIONS OF THE TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS AND TISSUES ACT 1994; ON GROUNDS OF LEGISLATIVE COMPETENCE, BREACH OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, AND ARBITRARINESS?
WHETHER THE PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION IS MAINTAINABLE FOR CHALLENGING THE CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF THE CIRCULAR PASSED BY DMER WHICH STATES THAT- the hospitals shall examine and certify that the documents submitted by the donors and the donee are genuine, also that there is no financial transaction involved and that the donor's consent for transplant is based on his or her free will.
Hi SIr
One of bank is operational from my building premises and rental renewal is pending for more than 1.5yrs. multiple application, meeting done with branch Manager, circle head, zonal head but nothing is moving.
Please suggest the how to process further and legal advice.
Hello Sir, When we are requesting for bail in criminal case. Only bail petition is enough or do we need to attach the FIR copy with bail petition of Accused. And if judge allows will submit surities. If judge doesn't allow again when can we file next bail petition. Thanks in advance.
FIR is maintainable or not in 138 NI Act Cheque Bounce case if fraud is also involve in that case if maintainable can anyone provide ruling about this matter.
Ancestral property
My grandfather had 3 sons , one son died in the year 1967 I.e my father , my grandfather divided his property after the death of my father in the year 1967, my grandfather some property mutated to my name instead of my father's name till today from 1967 the property on my name , now my sister claiming share in my property, whether it is ancestral property? I have studied the ancestral property should be un divided since 4 generations old , means my self ,my father, grandfather, great grandfather? Whether limitation act can apply?