sir,
other than the common defences that could raise such as
1. capitalisation of interest
2. penal interest
3. other hidden charges
4. non furnishing of proper stattement
what other defenses which we could raise in a suit for recovery of amount due filed by a bank ?riven
If any son, daughter or grandson etc can challenge any sale of Ancestral property then who is absolute owner and who can sale it.riven
A endorsee can file a case u/s 138 of N.I. act against the drawer?riven
Under which act and under which section a Muslim can file a case for restitution of conjugal rights?riven
FROM
N. SANKAR, ADVOCATE,VELLORE 632 009.
DEAR FRIENDS,
KINDLY LET ME KNOW WHETHER A PERSON BEING THE OWNER OF THE VEHICLE WHO HAS INSURED ON HIS OWN NAME (OWNER CUM DRIVER), CAN CLAIM COMPENSATION FROM THE INSURANCE COMPANY FOR HAVING HIMSELF DRIVEN THE VEHICLE AND SUSTAINED GRIEVIOUS INJURY.
riven
My client issued a cheuqe (voucher) of Cooperative Society to the complainant. The said Cooperative Society did not have 'Banking Business Licences" from the RBI.
therefore my question is that whether the said Coperative Society issued a cheque if yes then what is the legality of it in the NI Act 138
Pls Reply -- Urgently with citations and other provisionsriven
Can anyone explain to me the distinction between the following terms:
1. Judicial custudy/remand
2. Police custody/remand
3. Transit remand
Regards
P.C. Joshiriven
In 2004,property involving 2 minors aged eight& 6 years old was purchased by X. As their father was deceased, their mother had signed on their behalf.This property also involved 6nos. of other majors of whom the shares are undivided & they too signed. It was later sold to Y and from whom we purchased it in 2008. HDFC rejected our housing loan upon the property stating minors as an ISSUE. Do we have full legal rights upon it OR if not, what is the procedures to make it valid?
Mother of the minors is ready to cooperate.riven
Dear Professionals,
Kindly enlighten on the following issues:
A Lease Deed for the property at Mumbai has been executed between the parties for 9 years. Suppose stamp duty of Rs. 1,80,000 has been paid by the Lessee on the same, taking into account the lease rent payable for the entire period of 9 years.
In this scenario, can the differential amount of stamp duty be recovered from the authorities in the following two circumstances:
(a) If after 1 year the Lease Deed is terminated, as the property has been used on leasehold basis only for 1 year, and not for 9 years as was expected at the time of stamping the lease deed.
(b) If after a period of 1 year, the lease rent is reduced for the remaining tenure of the lease by executing a Supplemental Agreement, as the total lease rent for the entire term of 9 years will be less than what was taken into consideration at the time of stamping the Lease Deed
Further, is it required to pay the additional stamp duty if the lease rent is increased over and above the lease rent covered in the Lease Deed; and whether such Supplemental Agreement increasing or decreasing the lease rent is required to be registered?
Thank you.
Regards,
Naveen Manghani
riven
MVC
Does light motor vehicle is a transport vehicle or non-transport vehicle? how many years liecence does the person gets from RTO for LMV.riven