plz.give me the judgments of comercial/livelyhood perpose in electricity board cases.
thaks in advance
one nationalized bank brought a complain against a lawyer that he intentionally make a legal opinion regarding a property. the nationalized bank make a complain before the state consumer forum of West Bengal. they complained that the lawyer negligently does not search the property details from the concerned registry office and make this legal opinion regarding this property. bank said the lawyer is negligent to his work but fact is that the lawyer searched the property from the concerend registry office were the public records are not available. the title deed was for the year 1959. this report was given to the bank as a legal opinion only not to pass any loan but the said bank wrongfully and illegaly with malafide intension by scepgotting the lawyer initiated a potracted litigation against the lawyer before the state consumer forum and asking a damarage for Rs. 1 Crore but till date they have not taken any legal action against the borrower.in this regard you are requested kindly help thelawyer by giving your esteem opinion and judgment which was passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, if any or any other related judgment/judgments.
Dear sir,
I would like to know about the present position of the cases related to the excercise of powers by the high court under Artice 226 even though an alternative remedy is available under the statue.
Pls provide me the latest judgement with regard to the above position.
Expecting your co-operation and help in the matter.
thanking you
yours faithfully
Rameshchandran
please make clear what are certain acts which are applicable to public company but not private limited company
what are the exemption for forming private limited company
how small company is formed.whether moa.aoa,share,director are required to be made
how small company is formed.whether moa.aoa,share,director are required to be made
how a small company can be formed.whether share,director,moa,aoa is necassary
Query under Maharashtra Rent Control Act
A limited company (A) whose is my tenant, and whose paid up share capital is less than Rs. 1.00 crores has been taken over by another limited company (B) whose paid up share capital is more than Rs. 1.00 crores, and is now under its (B) management and termed its 'associate' company. B is also referred to as the Holding Company of A in the balance sheet of A. Can A, my tenant be evicted under the above referred act since it is now held under the management of B whose paid up capital is more than Rs. 1.00 crores? What are the legal implications of the terms 'under the same management', 'associate' and 'holding company'?