Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

bhagwant   02 August 2008 at 12:25

Indian Penal Code

It is observed that Sec.427 is applied with Sec.279 IPC in Motor Vehcile accident Casses. My query is that for the purpose of mischief intention is necessary, and there is no intention to cause damage in Motor Vehicle Accidents, then how 427 is applicable with 279. Do any body have views from Apex Court, please send me.

Ladhu Ram Chowdhary   02 August 2008 at 07:19

sec.323 cr.p.c.

case fixed for judgment and from the evidence Magistrate found that offence u/s 397 I.P.C.appears to made outand it is triable by only court of session -Magistrate is emprowered u/s .323 to exercise the power before signing the judgment ?

Ladhu Ram Chowdhary   02 August 2008 at 07:04

sec.91 cr.p.c.

Whether recourse of provisions contained in sec.91 available to investigation officer ?

rohit jaiswal   02 August 2008 at 02:04

definition of expert

who is expert according to cort who can detrmine those technical matters from which court is not familier?

plz give aany case of supreme court.
example:-
who will determine that deploma in architecture and in interior decoration with 10 years experience in architecture service are whether equivallent or not ?

if u have any citation then plzzzzz cite it.example is a real case problem

Vijay Kumar   02 August 2008 at 00:24

court fee by pleader

If an advocate intimates the court in writing regarding the death of one of his clients in compliance of Order XXII Rule 10A of CPC, whether he is required to pay court fee under Court Fee Act or any other law?
It happened with me today. I affixed the court fee but I want to satisfy my academic curiosity.

Vivek Shukla   01 August 2008 at 19:48

whether court can condon delay under Land acuisition act after the period of 42 days

1996 (1) Maharashtra Law Journal is a Division Bench Authoirity K Ramaswami and J.B. Patnaik, JJ and it is held that the provisions of limitation act are not applicable and the reference has to filed to the collector within 42 days. therefore after 1996 the delay is not condoned in Maharashtra. if there is any authority after 1996 of Supereme Court saying that the delay can be condoned under the Land Acquisiton Act for filing reference ? Pls send us the lattest authorities of Supreme Court alongwith the full text.

kalyani choudhury   01 August 2008 at 19:16

ancestral or selfowned property

my father bought land on govt.lease at concessional rate with his own earnings from the govt of India on the basis of a refugee certificate issued in my grandfathers name and his children who were majors at that time. Is this property classified as ancestral or selfowned ?can he will it to his son ? or the other children of my grand father also have a right to this property ?

RADHA PYARI SRIPADA   01 August 2008 at 16:26

trade marks

in an application for trade marks we have filed objections.while upholding our objections certain amount of costs have been imposed on the applicant. how do we recover such costs? should we send a letter ourselves or the registrar of tms direct them to pay us?

RADHA PYARI SRIPADA   01 August 2008 at 16:18

trade marks

when an application for trade mark is declared as abandoned and the limitation period for restoration is lapsed, is it that the only remedy available is to file fresh application for the same mark?

yash doshi   01 August 2008 at 13:39

manufacture

we have been paying excise duty on the products we produce(through electrical stamping)
since we pay excise duty it is of common understanding that the process of electrical stamping is a manufacturing process because excise is only on manufacturing or production

now our ITO says that in income tax it will not be considered as manufacture and excise act has nothing to do with income tax act

Can such contradictory views be allowed?
in case of dispute should electrical stamping be considered as manufacture?
in case of such contradiction which law should be upheld?
if any of you have any case laws(preferrably of supreme court) relating to such contradictory views of income tax and excise please forward it to me on my e mail id at yash_2687@yahoo.co.in.

thank you
regards
yash doshi