This discussion revolves around a fraudulent claim for family pension by a lady posing as a second wife of a deceased army veteran. She filed a civil suit 12 years after his death to be declared his legal wife, which was granted. The querist questions the validity of this decree due to the delay and potential applicability of the Limitation Act. Experts suggest that while the decree stands until challenged, fraud can potentially void it, and the Limitation Act might not apply if fraud is proven. The querist, a third party, is also seeking to understand their locus standi to challenge the decree, especially as the fraudulent claim impacts their property.