Vacant land dispute
Ranjani
(Querist) 25 October 2015
This query is : Resolved
Sir/Madam,
I am Ranjani from hyderabad. My father owned a property in 1995 at visakhapatnam . He took a hand loan of Rs. 50,000 by keeping the land papers and signing a blank promissory note from his friend in the year 2001. We have migrated to hyderabad in 2002 and we couldn't pay the interest amount on time which is Rs.1500 per month. My father passed away in 2004 due to cardiac arrest. My Father's friend filed a petition in the court for Rs. 2,50,000 stating that my father took the amount in 2008 and submitted the promissory note. We did not know about this whole situation till date. 2 days ago we went to visakhapatnam to check our land and we spoke to my dad's friend regarding the papers and ready to pay the principal amount along with the interest for Rs. 50,000. For which he said he has got ex party decree in his favor from court and to close this case he was demanding Rs.15,00,000. My mother never signed any promissory note and more over my father was not alive in 2008. Are there any chances to fight on this case. Attached is the file for your reference. Please help us with your valuable inputs. Thanks in advance.
Guest
(Expert) 25 October 2015
Consult A Local Good Advocate in Vizag and Have criminal Proceedings Against him and certainly he would come for A compromise and the Issues would be settled.
ABDUL RAZIQUE
(Expert) 25 October 2015
You took a certify copy of ex party decree and file a chit case against the person on the basis of death certificate of your father. May Almighty bless You.
For smooth proceeding you consult A good local lawyer immediate without delay and default.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 27 October 2015
Consult some senior lawyer and show him documents. The lawyer would take copies of case file for reference.
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
(Expert) 31 October 2015
This is a clear case of forgery and fraud. the circumstances are in your favor, you may consult an advocate in the local, discuss, reopen the case and fight it back, he may not be able to prove his case.
