charges vitaited with mala fides
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 11 October 2010
This query is : Resolved
I was charge sheeted in 2003. The High Court in 2006 quashed the charges having been found to be raked up, stale and retaliatory but provided respondets one more opportunity to objectively examine the allegations of misconduct of 1997- 2003.
This provided handle to the respondent No. 2 to re proceed against me. Whereas the Respondent No. 1 Central Governemnt remained neutral and did not objectively examine even though directed by the Court the Respondent No. 2 in which my junior was at the helms immediately served 15 out 20 charges that had been quashed by the Court having been found vitaited with mala fides. The catalyst was Government's Order that my junior could no longer act as Secretary and that I was to act as Secretary. He had no statutory powers while holding the additional charge of secretary under CCS cca Rules 1965.
The end of the game is that I have been compulsorily retired in an ex parte Inquiry.
Any advice for me please
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 11 October 2010
The remedy is again CAT against such farce inquiry and submission of its report. If you could establish your case in CAT then the Respondent no 2 would be penalised for its misfeasance.
