Zeeshan
18 August 2025 at 01:54
Sir, as stated earlier, I have a case of declaration pending with my tenant who claim to be owner of my shop on fake papers. Tenant name is Nanney.
Therein, tenant nanney , after his cross, bring a witness namely Rahul who claim that he was a witness in a agreement of year 1998. (i.e. 27 years ago).
According to witnesses and my advocate's cross examination, he was called by nanney in 1998 through his grandson amaan who is almost 5-6 years old that time and now approx 35 years old.
Now, we know that he is lying because nanney himself in his various affidavits says he is 69 years old now.
We know grandson amaan also, he is hardly 25 old now. Also we have his father's and mother's Voter Id slip who are 48 and 45 years old now. How can there son be 35 years old ?
What did we do now ?
1. Call grandson amaan in court ? Which is a lengthy process.
Or
2. Request court to cross tenant nanney again and ask him questions relating about his, his son, son's wife and grandson's age. Nanney is present on every date.
Or
3. File perjury u/s 340 against witness rahul ?
What else we can do now ?
Which is better, fast and more fruitful process ?
Kindly help.
Thanks
monu
17 August 2025 at 18:44
Dear Expert,
We have a ancestral property of father of my grandfather. My grandfather were three brothers.There are no partion executed For that property till date.my grandfather had the one third share of that Property.My father are six brother.My father has given his share to my younger uncle.which was just written on the stamp paper. no legal process to transfer the share was done. My query is that my father has right to transfer property to my uncle without my consent or Not.
Regards,
Monu
Chandresh Hapani
14 August 2025 at 16:24
FIR LODGE ON 1/1/2025. .after petitioner submit ON BEHALF OF SECTION 94 NOTICE all enough evidence to P.S.ON 17/1/2025.ALSO
DEPUTY COMMISNOR ORDER TO INVESTIGATION. ON 10/2/2025. UP TO MAY 5/5/2025. OC.THREE TIMES NOTICE SEND TO RESPONDENT. BUT RESPONDENT NOT APPER TO POLICE STATION. CAN YOU SUGGEST ME WHAT IS THE NEXT STEP I take on offcier .I have order U/s.175(3) BNSS.
still respondent not arrest. Not apparently to POLICE STATION. Three months gone .
Awaiting your reply
Anonymous
14 August 2025 at 14:14
Our lands(large extents) were occupied by central governament organisation and buildings are constructed and some land is lying vacant. This is more than Ac.150 ( Occupied much before Agricultural land Ceiling came in to effect , ie Befoe 1973 and is in Telanga State). Can we ask for Compensation Now! If yes, who/ and how to go about this issue.
Anonymous
14 August 2025 at 01:24
Dear experts,
We live in kdmc vicinity, our building is not authorized. There is disputes amongst developer and owner of the land. Our building has not received oc and cc. But our land is conveyanced. Court has ordered to demolish the building. We challenged the court order.
We decided to regularize our building.But builder is not cooperating. He has used FSI more than approved. Hence we have to bear those charges which could run into crores. But builder is not giving any money. It is clear breach of agreement.
So we filed case in court and register case in police station. Whats other legal option we have so that we can make him pay
Anonymous
13 August 2025 at 17:44
1.EARLIER OUR BUILDER AS CONDUCT ELECTION ON THE NAME WELFARE ASSOCATION AND NEW ELECTED BODY IS FORMED UNDER WELFARE ASSOCATION .
2. THE ELECTED OWNERS MEMBER HAVE DECIDE TO CHANGE FROM WELFARE ASSOCATION TO FLAT OWNERS MUTUALLY AIDED COOPERATIVE MAINTENANCE SOCIETY Ltd AS PER ACT TELANGANA.
3 REPRESNATION HAVE BEEN GIVEN FROM ELECTED BODY FOR - FORMING THE FLAT OWNERS MUTUALLY AIDED COOPERATIVE MAINTENANCE SOCIETY Ltd TO THE REGISTER AND NEW CERTIFICATE IS AMMEND TO FLAT OWNERS MUTUALLY AIDED COOPERATIVE MAINTENANCE SOCIETY Ltd AS PER ACT TELANGANA Act 1995.
4.PRIOR TO CONDUCT NEW ELECTION BODY AS PER FLAT OWNERS MUTUALLY AIDED COOPERATIVE MAINTENANCE SOCIETY Ltd. Act 1995 AN Ad-hoc Committee IS appointed .
5. WE HAVE TWO FLOOR OF KIDS INDOOR AMMENTIES GAMES .
WHERE IN ONE FLOOR CAFTERIA IS SHARED WITH KIDS INDOOR GAMES .
RECENTLY WHAT WE HAVE OBSERVED THE KIDS PLAY AREA IS COMPLETLY SUPPRESED AND SHIFTED TO ANOTHER FLOOR WHERE AREA IS VERY LESS , WHEN WE QUESTIONED WITHOUT GB MEETING AND DISCUSSION HOW CAN THE EC TEAM HAD TAKEN DISCUSSION .
6. PRESIDENT REPLIED THAT THE EC TEAM HAS ALREADY TAKEN DECISION AND INFORMED NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO ASK QUESTION AGANIST THE DECISION OF EC WAS HIS REPLY .
7. REQUEST YOUR SUGGESTION WHAT TO DO .
Yashvant Bhardwaj
13 August 2025 at 02:07
I want to file an appeal in Specific Reliefs Act, 1963, section 26 for rectification of my sale deed. There are two mistakes. First, is in the flat number of my flat. This was clearly a mutual mistake since the draft of sale deed was prepared by the vendor but I failed to notice the mistake while signing the deed. Both parties signed the deed. Flat no. was clearly mentioned in the allotment letter. The second mistake is in the name of the vendor's authorised representative who came to execute the sale deed. The board of resolution correctly mentions his name but in the sale deed his name's spelling is wrong. I had asked them a couple times before execution of the sale deed to show me the board of resolution but they did not. Later on while inspecting the register of the sub registrar at the time of obtaining the certified copy I noticed his aadhar card had a different spelling of his name. This was clearly a suppression of facts. In my opinion this is a case of fraud. Now, the first mistake is due to mutual mistake and the second mistake is due to fraud. What should I allege in my overall appeal, fraud or mutual mistake. Can I allege mutual mistake for first mistake and fraud for the second in the same appeal.
Also, I bought the flat jointly with my Uncle's son Paramjeet Bhardwaj who currently is residing abroad and cannot come to attend the case on every date. The description of Purchasers in the sale deed is written in the following way: "Yashwant Bhardwaj jointly with Paramjeet Bhardwaj hereinafter referred to as the Purchaser(s)". This means there is a joint liability imposed which is different from joint and several liability. Does the "jointly with" clause mean that both of us would have to appear on each date, or can I appear alone on each date and Paramjeet need not come.
Nitin
12 August 2025 at 15:48
Hello experts,
I have taken 3 4 personal loans from apps live Aditya Birla, Paysense, Navi, BajajFinserve. EMIs were going well but from last 3 months I lost job as many in IT. Now it is becoming difficult to pay EMIs. The day EMI bounces, the recovery agents call and threaten to come home and recover their way.
I want to ask if there is any way I can ask Loan companies to give me relaxation for 2 3 months and till then I will join another job? Is there any legal provision?
Thank you.
Mastan Shaikh
11 August 2025 at 13:57
I have passed my LLB in the year 2006 i.e. before AIBE Rules 2010. After enrolment in the year 2025 with Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa I have been issued Provisional E-SANAD and Provisional E-ID without putting validity stamp. Please, let me know in how many days or months or years I will get Final SANAD and Final ID card. Please suggest me in this regard. I have sent so many letters to the Bar Council but there is no response.
Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/experts_application.asp
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Time period
THAT AN EMPLOYEE HAD RESIGNED FROM THE JOB AFTER WORKING FOR ALMOST A YEAR. THEREAFTER THE EMPLOYER DID NOT PAY THE SALARY OF THE EMPLOYEE EVEN AFTER REPEATED REQUEST. MY QUERY IS THAT ALMOST A YEAR HAS PASSED DO EMPLOYEE CAN APPROACH THE LABOUR OR CIVIL COURT FOR RECOVERY OF HIS SALARY SINCE TIME PERIOD OF ONE YEAR HAS PASSED. PL ADVICE