Anonymous
07 August 2017 at 16:18
What do you mean by - Proof affidavit filed and recorded as PW 1 chief Ex.P1 to P67 marked..Will the court will proceed for an order in the next hearing?
Bharati sanjay kamble
07 August 2017 at 15:58
My friend having relationship with other women who already both are marriednow his wife case against him what will be the conseqences to face
venkat b.
07 August 2017 at 14:56
sir,
I sold off my parental property and want to know whether I can utilise the funds till I buy another house. And also please tell me whether I can reduce my capital gains by claiming the payment made to the bank where my fathers property was under loan. I had cleared the loan alongwith my brother after the demise of my father. regards.
Allan
07 August 2017 at 14:46
There are 6 brothers who own a property that has been handed to them by their mother (now passed).
One brother is refusing to sign papers to sell the property to a developer (already interested and wants to pay now).
Can the majority rule if only 1 of the 6 shares refuses. How can we get him to sign the papers for sale?
Vikas Bansal
07 August 2017 at 14:22
My friend's widow mother and his brother transferred their portion of house on my friends name. It was on name of my friend, his brother and his widow mother. Now they are accusing him that my friend got house transferred by using wrong means. There was no exchange of money against house transfer. I understand that due to parent act my friend's mother is entitled to get her property back. But is my friend's brother also entitled to take his portion back?
Adv.Maruti Sopan dudhgonde
07 August 2017 at 13:45
Hi sir. I'm Maruti I'm belongs from poor family. My issue is_ I M engineering college student and my colege never display my results, without results they give Me register in Next semester , at last stage they say Me I'm failed in ²,³rd sem, I gave exam again that subject they say failed...... Since 212-2015 without any results I was gave exam and Now they say Me I'm not eligible For degree... I had completely last year project, I applied rti but they never replied...
Anonymous
07 August 2017 at 12:49
DEAR EXPERTS,
I AM ACCUSED UNDER FALSE 498 A CASE, FILED BY MY WIFE IN NOV 2016.
TILL DATE I DIDN'T RECEIVE ANY KIND OF SUMMON. SHE FILED A CASE UNDER 498 A,3/4 DP ACT, 504, 506.
MY FATHER, MOTHER, BROTHER AND MY SISTER INCLUDING ME ARE ACCUSED.
I WANT TO KNOW THAT WHAT ARE THE LEGAL STEPS WHICH I HAVE TO TAKE TO SAVE MYSELF AND MY FAMILY FROM THIS FALSE CASE.
PLEASE SUGGEST ME LEGAL OPTIONS.
THANKS
Vijaykamal
07 August 2017 at 12:16
What is the meaning of RR and RE in the column of name of the parties in Encumbrance certificate??
AKULA RAJASEKHAR
07 August 2017 at 12:09
Dear Experts,
My wife has filed MC against me.,at the time of evidence submission,she submitted some photographs.,but some photos are tampered,at the time of cross examine of my advocate.,she agreed that i have tampered some photos....and same copy i have taken from cocern court.,in their clearly mentioned i changed some images in that photo like that.,
My Question is What shall i do this case.,Is there any chances to file against her?OR Shall i complain @local police station? Suggest me Plz.
Regards,
Rajasekhar
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Re-cross examination under order 18 rule 17 of cpc
I filed a specific performance case for getting registered 5 bigha land for which I entered into a registered agreement and paid full amount in 2005. Respondent is lingering on the matter and the case is pending for last twelve years. Petitioner’s evidence was closed six months ago. Respondent is taking dates by submitting some pleas and now he submits some documents:- 1.Copy of petition between one of the respondents and petitioner u/s 138 in which petitioner has won the case. 2. Memorandum and Articles of Association of Respondent’s company. Even though, the respondent had raised questions regarding the submitted documents in the cross-examination of the petitioner which was held 3 years before the submission of the documents and the petitioner had replied the question, the respondent submits an application to again cross-examine the petitioner stating that they are required to ask some questions on the documents filed by them now under order 18 rule 17 of CPC. Is it permissible? It is just a delay tactics of the respondent.