Anonymous
30 July 2025 at 21:00
I own a commercial property in my town. Between road and my property there is a property of my brother which is measuring 7 sq yds. If I have to enter my shop, I have to walk through the above 7 sq. yds. site. They are threataning the person who is my tenant. Will I get easement right? If I am granted an onkection, what will be the next step? I was told that the court will appoint a person and I neef to show him the property to him amd convince him. Please let me know what will happen after an injection was granted.
Anonymous
30 July 2025 at 19:23
Hi Kindly Guide -
A promoter sold Institutional land under Residential plot scheme. Now development authority declined its land conversion as per High Court orders. So, Kindly guide -
1) Can a case be filed in RERA. As land is institutional but sold as Residential Plot. if Yes - Under which Section of RERA
2) Can this Institutional Land be registered in RERA under which section of RERA. As it is sold as plotting to buyers.
3) Are Institutional Land liable to register in RERA, if yes .. Why and under which section of RERA.
4) Can this be termed as unfair trade practice in RERA and under which section.
RAJESH CHOPRA
30 July 2025 at 07:08
I was to get a flat from the builder after a wait of 15 years
The builder got the OC, and when I was about to get the flat, he went into liquidation under IBC
Thereafter, the builder under the pressure of Interim resolution professional took an affidavit from me & all that I will not file any case for any type of dues. where as the builder was to give me my delay penalty as per agreement of BBA.
Now, since I have got the flat and registry done, can I now go to the court and file a case, saying that affidavit was taken under Coercion or threat of not giving possession till I give affidavit?
Anonymous
27 July 2025 at 23:24
Maharashtra govt has issued new GR on 15/5/25 for Sindhi displaced persons having lease hold plots in any where in Maharashtra, As per new GR all Sindhi camp plots are to be converted to freehold after paying some amount
My application is in process, Report has been sent by Dy superintendent Land records office to SDO office, and SDO office has sent report to Dy collector , now Dy collector will issue challan for conversion fee and then issue order for conversion to free hold
My question is that , since land records office and SDO both have sent favourable reports , then Can Dy collector/Collector can disapprove it? Or he will approve it, every thing is ok, no breach of contract of lease
raju
27 July 2025 at 23:05
The complainant consumer case was allowed. The opposite party did not comply to orders and thereafter execution application was filed and same also allowed. In consumer order it is mentioned that opposite party will refund the entire amount with 6 % from the date of complaint till realisation. My query is that opposite party now ready to refund the amount and do i have to return the product whereas in the consumer order it is mentioned to refund the amount by opposite party. Please advise
Anonymous
27 July 2025 at 08:15
I have filed a formal complaint before the State Bar Council against an advocate for the following acts of professional misconduct:
Issuing a legal notice containing false and extortionary claims without any legal foundation.
Making demands in the notice that were unsupported by evidence or any reference to appropriate provisions of law.
Abusing the legal process to harass and intimidate me, in clear violation of Rules 4 and 5 of the Bar Council of India’s Standards of Professional Conduct and Etiquette.
⚠️ Respondent’s Defense
In response, the advocate has submitted a reply that suffers from the following major deficiencies:
No supporting documents were attached.
No documentary evidence has been filed to rebut my factual claims.
No reference or justification has been made under any provision of the BCI Rules.
Several serious allegations (especially those concerning illegal motives, intent to misuse legal process, etc.) were left unaddressed, indicating selective silence.
The Bar Council has now asked me to submit a rejoinder in five copies, indicating that the case has been referred to the Disciplinary Committee (DC).
📌 My Rejoinder Highlights
In my final rejoinder, I have emphasized the following:
As per Rule 8(1), Chapter I, Part VII of the BCI Rules, the Disciplinary Committee is expected to decide matters on the basis of affidavits and documents. The Respondent has submitted neither.
Since the Respondent has submitted no evidence or counter-materials, no factual dispute remains that would require further clarification. The record stands uncontested.
The Respondent has made no effort to justify his conduct under the BCI Rules, rendering the defense legally hollow.
A prima facie case has already been established by me, thereby shifting the burden onto the Respondent—which he has failed to discharge.
❓ Request for Your Opinion:
Based on the above, I would like your professional view on the following:
Can a reply without documents, without legal citations, and with selective silence on serious allegations be treated as inadequate or non-existent in the eyes of the Bar Council?
Should the Disciplinary Committee treat the case as undefended in substance, and proceed to pass a reasoned order based solely on the complainant’s unrebutted submissions?
Sincerely,Your insights will help me assess whether I am interpreting the Bar Council Rules and the Respondent’s conduct correctly. I am also willing to pay for citations to support the above reasoning, if necessary.
Akshat
26 July 2025 at 22:45
I own a builder floor in Indore, Madhya Pradesh, which consists of six separate flats that are all leased out to tenants.
The entire building is currently serviced by a single main electricity connection from MPEB. For fair billing, I use individual sub-meters. However, the total consumption of all flats often pushes the main meter into the highest tariff slab, which significantly increases the per-unit cost for my tenants, as they do not get the benefit of lower initial slabs. Each family consumes between 160 to 250 unit maximum. Main meter goes 1000-1330 units.
I believe the most equitable solution is to install six separate domestic connections as it appears to lower the slab rates and fixed charged, one for each flat. I am seeking to understand my precise legal standing under the current regulations. We asked someone who said that only one "electricity connection will be provided which will be in name of property owner said no multiple Connections". NOTE: OUR WIRING FOR EACH FLAT IS SEPARATE
I have reviewed the **Compendium of M.P. Electricity Supply Code, 2021 (Version 2.5)**. My point of confusion is how the rules apply to a single owner of a multi-unit building with tenants, as the code often refers to terms like "Cooperative Group Housing Society."
My interpretation of the code suggests that:
Clause 4.18** may define each of my leased flats as a "separate premise".
Clause 4.84** seems to grant the right to demand a direct supply for a "leased" unit.
I would be grateful for your expert opinion on the following:
1. Under the current MPERC Supply Code, am I, as the sole owner of a multi-unit building with leased flats, eligible to apply for and obtain separate domestic meters for each flat?
2. Is my interpretation of the applicability of Clauses 4.18 and 4.84 correct in this context?
3. What would be the recommended formal procedure to follow to maximize the chances of a successful application with MPEB?
THIS IS LINK TO DOCUMENT https://mperc.in/uploads/editor/Comependium/MP%20Electricity%20Supply%20Code-Compendium-v-2-5.pdf
Please feel free to mention anything that I missed
Thank you
kunhi marakkar
26 July 2025 at 16:58
Since the number of a criminal case that was made long pending in 2000 is only 3 digits, it is not possible to check its status through ecourt now. How to get the new number?
visuiyer
26 July 2025 at 15:49
I had availed a personal loan of ₹6,00,000 at 13% per annum for a tenure of 48 months from Axis Bank. I have been a disciplined borrower and have paid every EMI on time without fail.
However, now the bank is demanding a 49th EMI to close the loan account, which I believe is incorrect and misleading.
When I questioned this additional EMI, Instead of providing the required proof, the bank sent a generic amortization statement on a plain white sheet—without any official signature, or on letterhead, or authentication. This amortisation statement is easily available on various online EMI calculators and does not serve as proof of claim.
Therefore, I requested the following documents:
1. A copy of the original loan sanction letter or agreement.
2. Month-wise loan account/billing statements from 15th July 2021 to 23rd July 2025.
3. A formal written justification explaining the basis for this alleged 49th EMI.
But the bank failed to provide the documents by not responding despite repeated requests and reminders, with an intent to recover the unjustified 49th EMI.
I suspect this could be either: Professional negligence, or A deliberate attempt to extract an excess payment without transparency.
Now, I am in a dilemma:
- If I don’t pay by 12th August 2025, my CIBIL score may be affected.
- If I do pay, the bank may remain silent and refuse refund, continuing this non-transparent practice.
As a senior citizen, this situation is causing me considerable mental stress. Therefore, I humbly seek your expert opinion on:
- Whether I should proceed with payment to safeguard my credit score.
- Or file a civil suit or writ petition against Axis Bank for falsely claiming an excess EMI of ₹16,097 without proof.
Veterans please guide me.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Easement right
I own a commercial property in my town. Between road and my property there is a vacant land of my brother which is measuring 7 sq yds. If I have to enter my shop, I have to walk through the above 7 sq. yds. site. They are threataning the person who is my tenant. Will I get easement right? If I am granted an injunction, what will be the next step? I was told that the court will appoint a person and I need to show the property to him amd convince him. Please let me know what will happen after an injunction was granted.