Raja Sundarraman
11 June 2008 at 00:30
Learned Friends, we ,being enrolled in the roll of the Bar Council won't be able to do any full time job in any Concern as per the BCI Rules. I want to know whether a proprietorship firm or a Company can have its own panel of Advocates and offer legal services to its customers through the panel on receiving fees therefor. Kindly Share your views.
ankit gupta
10 June 2008 at 23:13
hi there !
i am a 3rd year law student of 5 year llb course.
i am on my vacations ,please suggest me which course i can apply for in this time.
also tell me that what are the way to join the programs abroad,and what is the best coutry to go for study if i want to do my practice in india.
vinod bansal
10 June 2008 at 21:54
Sir I want to submit a case in which there are two sets of accused i.e. ABC & DEFG ,there is a eye witness in this case he is saying that real murderer are AB &C but police found in their investigation that real murderer are D,E,F, & G. Police also recovered weapon used in the murder at the instance of accused D,E,F, & G.Weapon Revolver was sent to FSL for expert opinion.Ballistic expert opined that this revolver was used in the present murder case because bullets which were removed (Taken Out) from the body of dceased and test fired bullets are fired from the same revolver.police discharged the accused AB & C and chargesheeted accused D,E,F, & G.but later on eye witness appear in the court and stated that real murderer are AB & C and D,E,F, & G.are not murderer,resultly AB &C summoned by the court us 319 crpc & now position is that two sets of accused are before the court one is AB &C & another is D,E,F, & G. Eyewitness is saying that real murderer is AB &C but FSL (Expert)report says real murderer is Accused D,E,F,& G.which version is acceptable.
Eswar
10 June 2008 at 21:25
What is retainable land under Andhra pradesh state law? Do we need to pay tax for selling retainable land in Andhra pradesh?
Eswar
10 June 2008 at 21:22
We had some ancestral property. We had an agreement with the society (name not mentioned) to sell at a nominal rate in 1970's. Govt said we cannot sell as we have excess land. GO was passed after 20 years to sell the land(retainable) and society approached us to register us the lands in their names. They promised to give nominal amount slightly higher than what was agreed upon in 1970's. we agreed on moral grounds. Now the govt is asking us to pay the taxes on the govt rate.
Govt rate was around Rs. 6000 per sq yd and we sold it for Rs.65. Now govt is asking us to pay the tax amt of Rs 1 crore 20 lakhs as there was an amendment in the law done sometime in 2004 or 2005 where the law says that we need to pay the tax even if we sell the land for a lower rate than the govt specified rate or give the land as a gift. This is Andhra Pradesh. Please advice on what needs to be done to come out of this situation.
jitu
10 June 2008 at 21:17
whether blanck cheque attract prosecution? if no plz give some judgement
jitu
10 June 2008 at 20:34
Several high courts in india had ordered to perform narco analysis of accuse however all the orders are stayed by hon"ble apex court. Now in this cercumstanes what would have been position of the trail court to deceid the question of narco analysis
Harry
10 June 2008 at 14:22
Hi, we are a consulting organization based out of Gurgaon, we are looking for a tie up for the following:
Real Estate Taxation Laws
Representation in Consumer Courts
N Thiruneelakanden
10 June 2008 at 13:12
I am practicing lawyer in Salem of Tamilnadu from the year 1998. Can i get a LPO job in Chennai or Banglore. what are the qualification to do this work. As i am a fresher in this field is there is any trainning.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Is Tractor Accessories Automobiles Parts or Not
I am in “ Spare Parts Division” of a Tractor Manufacturer in the same premises i.e Tractor Manufacturing plant. The Tractor is exempted for the levying of excise duty on final product. But in Spare Parts division, we procure the parts from the suppliers and sell them within the packing of our company ( with the brand name of our company) charging the Excise Duty on the basis of MRP under the latest amended notification on 14/2008-C.E.(N.T.) dated 01/03/08.
We clear all the Tractor Spare Parts with charging excise duty along with the Tractor “Accessories “ also with applying the same method ( Packing and Labeling of our company).
As per the above mentioned notification “ Parts, components and assemblies of automobiles of any heading are liable to charge the excise duty on the basis of MRP.
My Question is ---
1. Are, in your view, Tractor Accessories also falls within the criteria of Parts, components and assemblies of automobiles ?, as the “Accessories” are not specifically define in the said notification.
2. If the tractor accessories are not covered under the automobile parts, can we clear them without charging the excise duty or not ?.
Pls give me valuable opinion.
Regards
Sanjay Sharma
9811095996