R.Manivasagan
26 November 2008 at 21:44
Sir,
I had filed a suit for Partition and declaration at Munsif Court since the share value is below Rs.30000/-. the Defendants entered appearance filed their Written statement, Counter, Drafted Issues in the first hearing itself. Subsequently, we had filed an application to amend the Plaint to include an ancestral property worth about 5 lakhs and we had 1 lakhs as our share in that property. According to our proposed amendment, if that application will be allowed the value will exceeds 1 lakhs and the present Munsif Court has no jurisdiction. In my matter, without allowing the amendment application, the Munsif Court returned the Plaint and other marked documents to represent the same before the proper court.
our contention is
1. without allowing the amendment application the Sub judge Court has no jurisdiction to take the suit on file.
2.The Munsif Court must pass an order in the Amendment application.
3. If our application will be allowed, the Munsif court may frame an issue regarding the jurisdintion and after that only the plaint should be returned.
Please clarify whether we correct in our stand or not.
Jaideep Nayyar
26 November 2008 at 20:25
Original Sale deed in the name of X who has since expired, his son applied for a loan with the bank on the basis of the said sale deed being the only legal heir of X. Now whether the bank can create an equitable mortgage on the basis of this sale deed
The property is Lal Dora property i.e. no entry in the revenue records and only the TS-1 in the muncipal corporation the same is in the name of the son
JIGNESH GANGER
26 November 2008 at 18:07
Kindly send me a Draft Copy of Bye - Laws required for Co-Op.Hsg.Society as early as possible.
Thanks in Advance.
Dinesh Sahrawat
26 November 2008 at 17:57
If a case is adjudicated by the arbitrator, then whether the same case can entertained by the consumer court ?
Legal_Query
26 November 2008 at 17:45
Dear Sir,
A foriegn company, not having office in India issued a cheque to an Indian Company, which bounced due to the reason account closed, can the company be prosecuted under the N.I.Act. What are other remedies available.
Thnks & Rgds
Nishant Singla
26 November 2008 at 16:52
My questions are all around about the significance of Crpc in the cases relate to panchayat act in Haryana.
Que: - One of a person of my village complained to DC of my District YNR about the misappropriation of funds in the tenure of my Father (who was a former surpunch of village at that time.) After doing inquiry the Department asks us to submit 96301/- due to some mistakes in the maintaining record. My father after received the notice from DC submit the said amount. Then the DC has filed the inquiry report in his office and no criminal was sued against my father by the DC. But the aforesaid person due to some political rivalry made a complaint to court U/s 406,420,467,468,471 and the court ordered the local police station for register an FIR and investigates the Case as per law.
My question is that apart from the Distt administration and the district panchayat department a individual person has a legal right to get a case register in the police station against the former surpunch besides this if the distt administration has no other objection and do not find any suitable base to get register a fir against the defendant.
So, is it a wrong order of the respectable judge as per legal proceedings of panchayat department?
V.G.Rao Advocate
26 November 2008 at 15:41
Hi all, I would like to Know under which act and provision a muslim couple can file a petition or OP for dissolution of thier Marriage by way of Mutual consent? please its urgent.
rakesh sharma
26 November 2008 at 09:27
I IT POSSIBLE TO GET REFUND OF STAMP PAPERS WHICH REMAIN UNUTILISED& WERE PURCHASED FROM TREASURY.
rakesh sharma
26 November 2008 at 09:26
I IT POSSIBLE TO GET REFUND OF STAMP PAPERS WHICH REMAIN UNUTILISED& WERE PURCHASED FROM TREASURY.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
negotiable instrument
respected seniors i am briefly stating facts of a 138case in which i am appearing for the accused. accusedtook a loan from the complainant bank and issed a cheque in the name of the bank. in default of payment of loanamount bank send the cheque for collection and get it dishonoured and hence the complaint.now complaint was filed by the manager but decision to file complaint was taken in a meeting of the board of directors of the bank but no letter authorising the manager to file complaintwasproduced.whether the complaint is maintainable.kindly provide any highcourt or s.c. judgement favourable to the accused. thankyou