LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

sukanya (Joyce)   01 August 2009 at 22:38

motor vehical accident case

Hello,

After dispose off the case, client failed to pay legal fees to counsel as per agreed fee-obligation. othr advocate files vakalat without get'g no-objection of previous advocate to get the amount release to the petitioner, so what is the remdy for the previous advocate can do to collect his/her legal fees kindly discuss/sugest.

jayachandran   01 August 2009 at 20:14

appearance

Dear experts
my question "appearance of Prisiding Officer" has been wrongly understood.
I feel sorry for not giving the question suitably.
The question is:
"A Presiding Officer is looking very ugly or when a person addressing the Presiding Officer feels uncomfortable to see his face"
Now I feel that I have explained the idea for my question

ravindra   01 August 2009 at 19:03

reagding case

sir
i mr ravindra reddy from bangalore i have purchased land from mr george takran in 2006 it has been registered to me
in 2003 george takran purchased land from mr shivanna got it registered ,in that son of shivnna also signed,now after 3 years shivanas daughter put case against me and george that she dint received her share from the property,
plase advice me

bnraj   01 August 2009 at 19:00

property sgare of hindu woman married in 1965

An ancestral property was sold for Rs 1200000 in the year 2006 and was distributed Rs 425000 each between 3 borthers but not given any thing to two own sisters.But one of the sister who was married in 1965 is now filed a suit against my father claiming equal share.
by virtue of present law state and central laws whether she suceed in suit are we become liable to pay the equal share ?

bnraj   01 August 2009 at 18:50

share of mwoman in fathers property married before 1994

What is the share of a married womwn married in 1965 out of ancestral property

kiran   01 August 2009 at 18:13

Divorce

Hello Sir/Mam,

I am undergoing a divorce and currently the case is at the stage of Cross examining the Petitioner(Myself).

Issue : On the day of cross examination in front of the Commissioner(Lady advocate), the Respondent(My wife) was present but their lawyer was absent. Subsequently, there was no cross examination and the commissioner wrote a letter saying due to absence of Respondent's lawyer the Evidence is being closed.

And I signed on the same letter, but Respondent refused to sign the same.

Question: Hence, I would like to know
1. Can we use such action to our advantage

2. If this action of Respondent and their lawyer could be favourable in my case.

Also, please let me know your suggestions on proceeding further.

Thank you in Advance.

sandeep chavan   01 August 2009 at 17:19

Handbook on co-operative society bye laws

Can anybody provide me useful material on Co-op Housing society bye laws.

Regds

RAJDIP DAS   01 August 2009 at 15:54

N.I. ACT

CAN PARTNERSHIP FIRM MAY FILE CASE ON BEHALF OF ITS UNIT ?

Tipsy   01 August 2009 at 15:46

Interest on Maintaineance and Repair fund


Housing Soceity can charge interest only on Maintaineance fund and Not on repair fund on defaulting members ?

Housing Society can charge interest on Building repair fund which has not been recd from members, as defaulting member say you can charge interest only on Maintaineance fund and Not on repair fund

What society should do , they should charge interest on delayed fund on maintaineance as well as charge delayed fund on building repair and renovation fund ?

kranthi kiran   01 August 2009 at 14:37

A.P.Land laws

Original Extent of the Land in the Sy.No. as Per Khasra Pahani is 17 Acres. Original Owner has all ready sold away the land to my client. The Original Owner in collusion with the revenue authorities has fradulently changed the extent of the Sy.No from 17 Acres to 24 Acres and thereafter obtained the Title Deed for the same. Later on he has sold away the above extent also to various persons. The revenue authoorities with out any application of mind have effected the mutation and granted title deeds to purchasers. My client having came the knowledge of the same has filed the application before the RDO. RDO has cancelled all subsequest mutation proceedings. The sub subsequent purchasers have filed the appeal stating them selves as bonafide purchasers. How to defend the case.Quote some citations in this regard if available.