Anonymous
24 March 2010 at 20:11
hi.....was Rs. 20 stamp paper valid since 1988 or later?????wat will be the consequenses of property transfer dated 1988 on Rs. 20 stamp paper if the said stamp paper was not valid during the same period?????
bhanu pratap720
24 March 2010 at 20:01
since women reservation bill proposes a 33% reservation in parliament, then according to article 368 does not it require ratification by 50%of the states as it proposes to change the schedule iv of the constitution of India .
Parthasarathi Loganathan
24 March 2010 at 19:57
Of Late, although States declare shortage of electricity and resort to Power Cuts, there is no Law on land to arrest or stop misuse of Electricity in public. Floodlit cricket matches, Political banners, Public Meetings, VIP marriage functions, power theft, Advertisement banners, etc all contribute towards misuse of Electricity. Is there any enactment under which these aspects can be taken up to the courts to intervene misuse of Electricity ?
bhanu pratap720
24 March 2010 at 19:54
i want to course the ll.m. course with specialisation in international law. kindly mention the institution which provide ll.m. in international law .
Anonymous
24 March 2010 at 19:43
what is the consequncy if on of witness has signed without knowing anything during registration of marrg.
Anonymous
24 March 2010 at 19:35
how to get registered marrige cancelled on realisation of mistake of giving consent to it.
Anonymous
24 March 2010 at 19:16
My father ninety years old applied for permission for sale of a part of his land from the City Development Authority and District Commissioner(as required by local law) , under coercion and duress taking advantage of his old age(1) by some of relatives when the said land was under mortgage with a bank(2). I brought these facts to the notice of the two authorities mentioned above requesting revocation of sale permission.
Subsequently the District Commissioner requested the Registrar not to register the sale deed against the sale permission granted by him. The City Development Authority did not take any action on my requests. A sale deed was executed based on the sale permission of City Development Authority and District Commissioner. How ever the purchaser was not the applicant to application sale permissions. Sale permission was issued to another person My Father and the original applicant signed an agreement stating no objection if the purchaser buys the land.
The plot of land mentioned has an old house standing over it. However neither the sale permission nor the sale deed mentions any house in the schedule of property. From the sale deed it appears as if a vacant portion of land was sold which is not in existence. I came to know about the sale deed through RTI. My father died one year ago and he signed the sale deed two and a half years ago. Now I want to challenge the sale deed on the following grounds
1. My father signed the sale deed under coercion and duress, a fact which I have brought to the notice of the authorities before signing of the sale deed. I have received copies of letters submitted to the respective authorities.
2. The sale deed does not mention any house in the schedule of property and also no value of the house except the land value was indicated in the sale deed which apparently deprives the govt. from revenue in form of stamp duty and registration fee.
3. The present house where I am residing along with my father's heirs was constructed by loan I had taken from Bank. The construction project of the house covers the whole plot of land including the land where the old house is also standing and that part of the land is meant for parking as per building bye law. This fact I had also mentioned in my appeal to City Development Authority for not issuing the sale permission and also in my appeal to revoke the sale permission. A part of the old house in my possession where as the other part is occupied by a tenant who is supposedly an employee of the purchaser who occupied six month prior to execution of the sale deed as tenant.
Kindly advise and also cite similar H.C or S.C cases.
Ritika ahuja
24 March 2010 at 18:21
I had deposited an INR 500 rupee note in a banks ATM. The bank said it was a discrepant note. The bank further stated that since I did not revert to them within a month of them sending me the letter intimating me about the same, they have destroyed the note for security reasons.
During my interaction with the bank, the bank also asked me to send them a copy of the letter which they had sent to me, which I complied.
Further to gather evidence, when I asked them to send me a copy of the letter as per their records, they simply say that the letter which I have is the same and do not provide me with the copy.
I suspect that there is something wrong about their claim of the note being discrepant. If they have a copy in their records, why arent they providing it to me inspite of repeated requests.
What are the remidies that I have if the bank is not proving me with copy of the letter as maintained in their records.
Further what are the other ways of proving that the 500 currency note deposited was descripant or not?
Pramod
24 March 2010 at 18:11
Dear Sir,
This is regarding the NMy one close relative has taken Bank loans fro 4 Bnaks on my loans . and assured me that he will pay all EMIs and dues in timely maner . But after few YEARS i came to know that he is not paid anything . and Banks recoved all loan ammount from me.
What shall I do to recover from My relative. He is working with RBI and know all fundas to cheat the novice persons.
Please advise.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Request advice
Respected sir/madam,
I have filed a criminalcase against my wife in Crpc 200 u/s 192,195,197,199,200 & 209 IPC which is punishable under IPC 193.in Apr 09 and tyhe Hon'ble court has tamen into the cognizance and issued the summoning order to my wife under sec 193 IPC. As she committed these act of offences made by her in her petition u/s 24 along with her petition u/s 13 HMA.
Now as the date of hearing has coming near , so she has withdrwan her divorce petition.
As she has withdrwan her divorce peitition as sec 24 petition was clubed .
so, some told me now no action will be taken against her in said ipc 193.kindly let me now that is it fact that she has withdrawn divorce because of that to get rid of punishment under 193.Please advice me for further action.