sorankee
08 August 2010 at 08:01
Hello, 08/08/10
My father died intestate ten years ago leaving behind a house property.My mother,a younger sister and I are the survivors.As such we have no dispute among ourselves,but for the sake of settling the issue,we would like to have the property partitioned in such a way that:
My sister is willing to relinquish her share for which I propose to pay her a consideration.
My mother is willing to relinquish her share in my favour,but I would like to ensure her right to reside,just in case I predecease her.
I should have clear title to the property so that I can raise a loan for renovation and extension of the house.
I know that one of us could file a case for effecting the partition,but we would not like to take the law court route as we have no quarrel among us.
I request your considered opinions and guidance.
Thank you,
Sorankee.
PS:I have posted this query mistakenly in the 'forum',please condone the error.
imteyaz farooquee
08 August 2010 at 07:41
is 324 IPC bailable or non-bailable,compoundable or non-compoundable ? It is amended in Cr.P.C amendment 2005 and enforced on 31.12.09 by the Central Government ,but here at Bihar, the criminal court does not act so as the Bihar government does not confirm it ? my question is that if the Bihar government does not implement it, then this section will be bailable or compoundable ?
Anonymous
07 August 2010 at 23:43
Oral partition of Ancestral land had done between my grandfather and his two other brothers at the time when they was alive, land is located in seven different location,
location no. 1,2,3 take my grandfather
location no. 4,5 brother no.1
location no. 6,7 brother no.2
each brothers occupied land is nearly equal, it had done around 65 years back,
location no.3 has been sold by my grandfather in 1972, after that each brothers heir enjoing that land and developed there locations
but all land is in jointly name of 18 person
in 2007 that all 18 has made a agreement on 100rs stamp paper 'our partion of land had done 62 years back and now nobody has objection on that partion' in presence of 3 witness,
now the heir of brother no.1 and 2 want to file a suit under hindu succesion act and want to do thee part of every location
i have invested lot of money in my location i have only xerox copy of that agreement.
is there claim is void?
is oral partion is invalid?
how can i protect and how are my chances to win?
please give me advise
thanks,
Anonymous
07 August 2010 at 23:41
Oral partition of Ancestral land had done beetween my grandfather and his two other brothers at the time when they was alive, land is located in seven different location,
location no. 1,2,3 take my grandfather
location no. 4,5 brother no.1
location no. 6,7 brother no.2
each brothers occupied land is nearly equal, it had done around 65 years back,
location no.3 has been sold by my grandfather in 1972, after that each brothers heir enjoing that land and developed there locations
but all land is in jointly name of 18 person
in 2007 that all 18 has made a agreement on 100rs stamp paper 'our partion of land had done 62 years back and now nobody has objection on that partion' in presence of 3 witness,
now the heir of brother no.1 and 2 want to file a suit under hindu succesion act and want to do thee part of every location
i have invested lot of money in my location i have only xerox copy of that agreement.
is there claim is void?
is oral partion is invalid?
how can i protect and how are my chances to win?
please give me advise
thanks,
Anonymous
07 August 2010 at 23:34
Can a valid agreement be done with govt. gency?
Recently a Director of a Govt. Deptt. made an open offer to award all the contractual works like construction of Staff quarter to my construction agency if I gift out my land, measuring about one Sq. km to the deptt. free of cost.
what should be the legal consequences if I enter into an agreement with the govt. like miscellany or reciprocal agreement?
Pls. suggest.
Vikash yadav
07 August 2010 at 23:11
A person knowingly issued a cheque with wrong signature and take a loan from his friend. now, he malafidly not returning the amount and the banker has written the cheque with remark "signature differ" please guide and also provide drafting,if any available.
Thanks
vikash
Vikash yadav
07 August 2010 at 22:47
A person knowingly issued a cheque with wrong signature and take a loan from his friend. now, he malafidly not returning the amount and the banker has written the cheque with remark "signature differ" please guide and also provide drafting,if any available.
Thanks
vikash
Vikash yadav
07 August 2010 at 22:45
A person knowingly issued a cheque with wrong signature and take a loan from his friend. now, he malafidly not returning the amount and the banker has written the cheque with remark "signature differ" please guide and also provide drafting,if any available.
Thanks
vikash
Baskaran Kanakasabai
07 August 2010 at 22:26
Acknowledgement:
My sincere thanks are due to the Honourable Chief Minister of Tamilnadu and the Honourable Deputy Chief Minister of Tamilnadu and the officials of the relevant departments for the assuring action taken by them from yesterday onwards. About 140 land owners referred to in the case-in-study in part 1 of my presentation, have received individual letters from the TN Government, with the intimation that their petitions are being directed to the relevant departments for necessary action. Probably this is the first batch of intimations.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Over 5 years of proceedings u/s.138 N.I. Act
Its over 5 years now that criminal case (after depositing blank cheques) u/s.138 N.I.Act has been filed against me the complainantis a leading international bank which has failed to attend proceedings regularly and also failed to produce evidence against me is there any remedy.
Thanks