shivraj
23 October 2008 at 20:40
whether POA holder can sign and verified the complaint and disposed on behalf of complaint who is looking after the transaction of complinant and he knows of the all the fact?related any current case laws.
Mohamed Ali
23 October 2008 at 18:18
A muslim partition suit was decreed in name of 6 Sons as defendants and 5 Daughters as plaintiffs, As per decree sons are entitle for 2/17th share and daughters are entitle for 1/17th share..
While filing FDP all the original defendants and plaintiffs were dead as this a very long pending suite,
Hence all their LR's had to be brought on record to represent them in FDP.
In one 3rd plaintiff's(Died in 1978) case who is a daughter,
She had 3 children 1 son(died in 1974) and 2 daughters, Son had predeceased her mother (hence he is not entitle for share as per Mohameddan law)..
But by mistake or purpose, The predeceased sons heirs were brought on record while filing of FDP.. As per LAW they are misjoinders, As their father( is a predeceased son of 3rd plaintiff) and is not entitle for any share in the 3rd plaintiff share of property.
FDP is still pending, As per decree my great grandmother is entitle for 1/17 share, while filing of FDP they have brought on record heirs of this predeceased son as LR's (misjoinders) along with their 2 aunts,
Since FDP is to allot 1/17th share for my Great grandmother in that only two daughters of Original 3rd plaintiff are entitle for share.
Point to be noted: These predeceased son's children were brought on record, while filing of FDP in 1984, where as preliminary decree was passed in 1970, since the original 3rd plaintiff had died(in 1978) and her son died in 1974.
In muslim law birth right is not recognised(where Hindu law recognises birth right), hence question who are the LR's entitle for share in 3rd plaintiff 1/17th share will come up only after her death, Since her son had predeceased her,
Only 2 daughters of 3rd plaintiff are entitle for share not childrens of predeceased son... this is our IA.
question:
FDP is still pending, Will the court executing decree will delete these misjoinders in FDP proceedings itself, as per Rule 10(2) and sec 47. or we have to file a seperate suite after FDP...
Rameshchandran
23 October 2008 at 16:15
Dear members of legal fraternity,
I want to clear my doubt with regard to the demat account. Everybody know that the present situation of the global market and recession and liquidity problem.
Inorder to resolve this issue, why can't the government can allow the inversters to open and invest in demat account without giving the details of source upto 10 lakh, so that the black money will flow into the market and we can save the indian economy from global liquidity and recession.
I expect every bodies valuable sugession in this matter to acquire knowlede and share the ideas.
thanking you
With regards
Ramesh
D.ANANDHAGIRI
23 October 2008 at 13:58
SIR ,
ONE OF THE CO-PARCENER OF THE ANCESTRAL PROPERTY SOLD THE SHARE OF HIS BROTHER AND DIED.SHALL THE SALE BIND THE LEGAL HEIRS OF THE DECEASED
bindia
23 October 2008 at 13:21
How can i practice in consumer courts? can a fresher with no xperience in litigation work in consumer courts or only experienced lawyers are eligible to work over there? what is the procedure for becoming a practising advocate of consumer courts? is there any specific exam a candidate is required to clear for it? please provide me all the relevant information regading this.
bindia
23 October 2008 at 13:21
How can i practice in consumer courts? can a fresher with no xperience in litigation work in consumer courts or only experienced lawyers are eligible to work over there? what is the procedure for becoming a practising advocate of consumer courts? is there any specific exam a candidate is required to clear for it? please provide me all the relevant information regading this.
Rajaram C Iyer
23 October 2008 at 12:04
Dear Friends,
Please give me the Uttar Pradesh Right to Information Rules
Thanks
Raja
ravi
23 October 2008 at 07:47
difference between section 53 of transfer of property act and provincial insolvency act
mansi
22 October 2008 at 23:45
Can a person having a dual citizenship in India and UK buy a property in his own name for redevelopment or development purpose? If yes is there any restriction like an NRI that he can buy only if it is above 5 lakhs Sq. Ft.?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
law of limitation
Hi every body, I want know what is the period of limitation to file a mortagage suit.