Kalpesh suryawanshi
19 November 2013 at 12:44
Hello ,
I don't really have a copy of the order of supreme court of India judgment , regarding the LPG subsidy so i am a bit confused about Weather it is compulsory or Optional to link your aadhar number with the LPG Distributor ,kindly clarify my doubt..and if possible kindly give me a copy of he judgment of supreme court of india thank you.
Kalpesh M Suryawanshi,
09822560085
Kalpesh suryawanshi
19 November 2013 at 12:41
Hello ,
I don't really have a copy of the order of supreme court of India judgment , regarding the LPG subsidy so i am a bit confused about Weather it is compulsory or Optional to link your aadhar number with the LPG Distributor ,kindly clarify my doubt..and if possible kindly give me a copy of he judgment of supreme court of india thank you.
Kalpesh M Suryawanshi,
09822560085
Pradip
19 November 2013 at 12:31
SIR,CAN ANY PVT LTD.CO.HAVE A RIGHT TO DISALLOW PAYMENT OF LEAVE ENCASHMENT TO EMPLOYEE (STAFF)
yusuf
19 November 2013 at 12:20
dear sir after 6 years of my marriage and i belong to muslim community my father in law my husband my mother in law and my husband's brother has sold their land and not given me a share now can i claim for that property;s share from the present land owner plz reply me
thanks & regsrds
Mohit Naithani
19 November 2013 at 12:19
PLEASE PROVIDE ANY REFF OF CRIMINAL LAWER IN FARIDABAD.
URGENT....
Sanjiv Malhotra
19 November 2013 at 12:06
My father in law has been living with us ( i.e his daughter and me (son-in-law))since the last 2 1/2 years as his son and daughter in law have shown utter disregard to his well being. my mother in law expired intestate in 2009. the son holds 16 % undivided share in my father in laws flat and my wife holds 16 % and my father in law 66 %. the flat was bought by self aquired funds by my father in law and his son has 0 Rs contribution to it. That being the matter i want to know the process of disinheritance as my father in law is very disturbed that his son and D in law havnt bothered to even call him ONCE or even meet him ONCe in the last 2 1/2 years. they are absolutely not bothered whether he lives or dies. Just the other day my father in law rang up his son and said he would like to meet him, and his son flatly refused to meet him or acknowledge him !! i would like to bring to the fact that we are in the process of filing suit of maintenance U/s 125 of the IPC against him ( the son ).Does this not amount the cruelty and indifference by the son towards his 82 year old father ? are they not laws that protect the rights of senior citizens against this absolute uncareing and indifferent attitude. I mean not even one phone call or visitinquiring about his health etc... not even one!! kindly advise. Thank you
Rajesh
19 November 2013 at 11:53
Sir, I am appearing as Defendant Witness in a case of Specific Performance on next DOH . I want to get your advice on the following issue --- Whether Witness has a right
(a) to request the Judge to get recorded his cross examination in Question & Answer format instead of only recording only answers.
(b) to get recorded his answer/s in his own language.
(c)to lodge objection with Judge to any question put by opposite party advocate during cross examination, which doesn't have any relevance or out of context .
any other area Which I should take care while deposing .
Gaurav
19 November 2013 at 11:44
Dear Honorable Experts,
We reached compromise during the proceedings of maintenance case (125CrPC). Family court Judge had facilitated the compromise settlement terms as part of their order. Also, passed the first motion.
In 498A, charge is framed on four of us. There are 5 names in FIR. four of them stay in india and one relative stay in US from more than 30 years and come to india once in a while.
Query:
Q1. During the HC Quash u/s 482 CRPC of FIR on basis of compromise, how do i make sure that FIR quash is applicable for my relative also who do not live in india? We do not have any contact with her.
Q2. Does Chandigarh HC quashes for all 5 members on the basis of petition filed by 4 of us? or Does POA or vakalatnama signed for 5th one would be required?
I am looking for views on how HC behaves in such circumstances in terms of passing order or what is the standard process dealing with such situations above.
Regards,
Gaurav
Geeta
19 November 2013 at 11:36
I have filed dv asking for shared household /matrimonial home had submitted the sale deed of the house which even today belongs to my husband .however he has stated that he had sold the house and is residing in a rented house .i have never resided in the rented house and doubt that even he is staying there.i had submitted the sale deed in my petition updated till sep and he says he sold it in aug.does court consider he sole statement only which is completely false ?what should I be doing now?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Section 138
Dear Sirs,
This is my first query in this forum.I thank the experts taking the pains and time to answer the queries in this forum which helps laymen like us to come out of the fear for anything legal.
a brief of the issue: section 138 case against my company .The summons were served against the company , myself and one other director-2 who has resigned now.Being the sole rep of the company now, i have assumed the responsibilities for everything pertaining to the company .This case ,the cause of action is on 27/10/2008.The director-2 has resigned on 31-3-2013.
My queries as under:
1)The director-2 did not appear when the summon was issued.Now the court has issued NBW against him.How can i avoid this take exemption for the non-appearance of the resigned director-2.
2) This case was first filed on 29/11/2008 under case # xxxx/08 by the complainant.Then subsequently the case has been renewed under ref # bbbb/09.We got the first hearing in sep-2013.The complainant a ltd company did not approach for any discussion during this period.Does this situation come under any limitation act?
Thanks again in advance for the valuable suggestions that you may provide.