GAURAV SHARMA
15 June 2026 at 19:30
My wife and her family have filed a 498 A case on me and my parents. They said in their chief that they have given a Cash of Rs. 7.00 Lakhs for purchase of saman in marriage. When we ask my father-in-law about the bank statement, He has shown a Passbook in which dates of transactions are cutoff to the court. So nobody can ascertain the date of transaction from that passbook. hence my Advocate didn't ask question about Rs. 7.00 Lakhs transactions from my father-in-law and mother-in-law. But We know very well that We did not take any money from my wife or her family.
Now My Query is
Can I ask for Bank Statement of my mother-in-Law from my brother-in-Law in 498 A Case. Kindly Guide
monu
12 June 2026 at 21:58
Dear Expert,
My wife and her friend had a conversation on mobile call.
In this conversation both made some remark on my wife's
Siblings sister. My wife's sister transfer the recording of this
conversation on her mobile from the my wife's friend mobile.
My query is about the legality of the transfer of this conversation without
the consent of my wife's friend.
What actions may be taken against the sister of my wife.
This is the case of violation of the privacy of my wife and the friends
Of my wife.
Regards,
Monu
Sachin
11 June 2026 at 21:49
Hello,
in yr 2013, my sister was doing live in with a guy. During that time my sister drew a cheque of Rs 1.8 lacs in Favour of car dealer and another 1.8 lacs to car dealer account through online transfer. The guy (accused), got all the payment receipts in his name from car dealer in Gurgaon.
All the payments made by my sister are reflected in her Bank passbook and bank statement.
the accused got the car registered in his name and ran away with the car. The car was registered in Delhi RTO.
My sister did a case under section 476/576 and 376 in gurgaon district court. The accused was arrested after 4 months since he was not traceable. On his arrest we came to know from IO that he has few other cases of fraud on him by some other ladies.
well there was only one case but the car hearing was under a different judge and the judge gave us a superdari release order and we took custody of the car with us. The car is with us for last 13 yrs. in next 2 yrs, the car is of no use since in NCR region we have to scrap the car after 15 yrs.
the case under section 376/476/576, was under a different lady judge and she freed the guy saying that my sister was living with her at herown will. We did not have patience to contest the case and so since last 13 yrs we never filed another case to contest it.
we got the car. now we wan the car to be trnasferred under my sisters name so that we can sell it or we can scrap it after 2 yrs. How can this be done. what case should be filed in Gurgaon court for car transfer in out name. We dont know where is the accused. He may be in jail in other cases or whatever.
we stay in ghaziabad and so the car needs to be registered in Ghaziabad in my sisters name. pls note we dont want to contest the release of the accused.
what should be Plan A and plan B depending on Judge decision ?
a rastogi
06 June 2026 at 08:33
All hon'ble learned advocates,
Kindly suggest me on the below summarized matter, what should be done, I am worried about my heavy amount stuck in between..
CASE SUMMARY Parties:
-- Buyer/Consignee: Neeru Rastogi (India)
-- Seller/Shipper: DigiKey Electronics (USA)
-- Carrier: FedEx
Transaction:
-- Electronics order placed with DigiKey.
-- Total order value approximately INR 47,000.
-- Shortly after placing the order, I realized that the wrong product variant had been selected.
Key Facts:
1. Before shipment movement started even before allocating assigning AWB Number, I notified both DigiKey and FedEx that I did not want the shipment and requested Return to Sender (RTS).
2. On 18 May 2026, I emailed FedEx requesting:
-- Refusal of shipment,
-- No customs clearance,
-- No BOE filing,
-- Return to Sender (RTS).
3. On 18 May 2026, I also emailed DigiKey requesting RTS and explaining that the order contained the wrong item.
4. Despite these communications, the shipment continued to move through the FedEx network and eventually arrived in India.
5. I repeatedly informed FedEx that:
-- I refused delivery,
-- I would not provide KYC,
-- I would not authorize BOE filing,
-- I wanted RTS.
6. DigiKey later confirmed in writing: "I have sent a request to FedEx and have asked them to return the package to us."
7. FedEx subsequently created multiple case numbers and confirmed that RTS-related requests were under review.
8. FedEx later requested:
-- An abandonment/refusal letter from me,
-- An RTS declaration letter from DigiKey addressed to Customs,
-- DigiKey's FedEx account details for billing RTS charges.
9. DigiKey later stated that they could not share internal RTS details and also indicated that return may not be possible because the shipment had reached India Customs.
10. As of the latest communication:
-- Shipment has not been delivered to me.
-- I have not accepted the shipment.
-- I have not submitted KYC.
-- I have not authorized BOE filing.
-- No final written RTS approval or rejection has been communicated.
-- No final disposition of the shipment has been communicated since 17 days approximately.
Issues Requiring Legal Opinion:
1. What are my rights after notifying both seller and carrier of refusal before shipment movement/early transit?
2. Can DigiKey require me to accept delivery before allowing a return when RTS was requested before delivery?
3. If RTS is ultimately denied, who bears responsibility for costs incurred after repeated refusal notices?
4. If the shipment is abandoned, returned, or otherwise disposed of, what refund rights do I have?
5. Does the early refusal communication affect liability for shipping, customs, restocking, or return charges?
6. What consumer-protection remedies are available if the matter remains unresolved and funds remain blocked?
Documents Available:
-- Emails to DigiKey requesting RTS.
-- Emails to FedEx requesting refusal and RTS.
-- DigiKey emails confirming RTS request to FedEx.
-- FedEx case references and responses.
-- Shipment tracking history.
Regards.
Ankur
a rastogi
04 June 2026 at 20:29
All hon'ble learned advocates,
Kindly suggest me on the below summarized matter, what should be done, I am worried about my heavy amount stuck in between..
CASE SUMMARY
Parties:
-- Buyer/Consignee: Neeru Rastogi (India)
-- Seller/Shipper: DigiKey Electronics (USA)
-- Carrier: FedEx
Transaction:
-- Electronics order placed with DigiKey.
-- Total order value approximately INR 47,000.
-- Shortly after placing the order, I realized that the wrong product variant had been selected.
Key Facts:
1. Before shipment movement, I notified both DigiKey and FedEx that I did not want the shipment and requested Return to Sender (RTS).
2. On 18 May 2026, I emailed FedEx requesting:
-- Refusal of shipment,
-- No customs clearance,
-- No BOE filing,
-- Return to Sender (RTS).
3. On 18 May 2026, I also emailed DigiKey requesting RTS and explaining that the order contained the wrong item.
4. Despite these communications, the shipment continued to move through the FedEx network and eventually arrived in India.
5. I repeatedly informed FedEx that:
-- I refused delivery,
-- I would not provide KYC,
-- I would not authorize BOE filing,
-- I wanted RTS.
6. DigiKey later confirmed in writing:
"I have sent a request to FedEx and have asked them to return the package to us."
7. FedEx subsequently created multiple case numbers and confirmed that RTS-related requests were under review.
8. FedEx later requested:
-- An abandonment/refusal letter from me,
-- An RTS declaration letter from DigiKey addressed to Customs,
-- DigiKey's FedEx account details for billing RTS charges.
9. DigiKey later stated that they could not share internal RTS details and also indicated that return may not be possible because the shipment had reached India Customs.
10. As of the latest communication:
-- Shipment has not been delivered to me.
-- I have not accepted the shipment.
-- I have not submitted KYC.
-- I have not authorized BOE filing.
-- No final written RTS approval or rejection has been communicated.
-- No final disposition of the shipment has been communicated.
Issues Requiring Legal Opinion:
1. What are my rights after notifying both seller and carrier of refusal before shipment movement/early transit?
2. Can DigiKey require me to accept delivery before allowing a return when RTS was requested before delivery?
3. If RTS is ultimately denied, who bears responsibility for costs incurred after repeated refusal notices?
4. If the shipment is abandoned, returned, or otherwise disposed of, what refund rights do I have?
5. Does the early refusal communication affect liability for shipping, customs, restocking, or return charges?
6. What consumer-protection remedies are available if the matter remains unresolved and funds remain blocked?
Documents Available:
-- Emails to DigiKey requesting RTS.
-- Emails to FedEx requesting refusal and RTS.
-- DigiKey emails confirming RTS request to FedEx.
-- FedEx case references and responses.
-- Shipment tracking history.
Regards.
Ankur
JAGADEESH
03 June 2026 at 13:38
Sir,
One of my cousins (sister) got married in 2016 and was blessed with a baby boy (9 years old). Her spouse traveled to Germany in 2017 and returned to India in 2022. Since then, he has been living in Hyderabad with his friends, while my sister and her son are in a rented house in Visakhapatnam. Her husband is not looking after them and is not providing a single paisa for them. So, what should we do now? How to safeguard her son's rights, and my sister wishes to initiate a divorce since her husband has not been employed for many years.
Manjunath Sompur
02 June 2026 at 15:29
The trail court passed an order of conviction for four years and fine under sec 468 and 420. High court reduced the period of conviction to one year with fine. supreme court confirmed the same. Now, can the accused file an application to trail court under PO Act?
Ratti Gulshanlal
02 June 2026 at 05:02
Central Government employees are deeply aggrieved by the Gazette Notification issued by the Ministry of Finance (Department of Economic affairs) (ECB & PR Division) dated 22 December 2003. This Notification has made the New Pension Scheme (NPS) would be mandatory for all new recruits to the Central Government Services from 01 January, 2004. Department of Pension and Pensioners Welfare (DoPPW) issued an Office Memorandum No. 57/05/2021-P&PW(B) dated 03 March, 2023 with a Subject - Coverage under Central Civil Services (Pension) rules, in place of National Pension System, of those Central Government employees who were recruited against the posts/vacancies advertised/notified for recruitment, on or before 22.12.2003.
Kindly issue a Pension Reform Office Memorandum/Circular stating that THE DATE OF VACANCY SANCTION/RELEASE LETTER BY THE CONCERNED MINISTRY OR DEPARTMENT MAY KINDLY BE TREATED AS DATE OF NOTIFICATION IF IT IS ISSUED PRIOR TO 22/12/2003. Such anomalies need to be rectified and the employees recruited against Vacancies released prior to 22/12/2003 may all be brought to the Old Pension Scheme
Anonymous
29 May 2026 at 16:44
-----------------------------------
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Mutation ghms
Uppal Bhagayat
I own Plot No. 1132 at Uppal Bhagayat, Hyderabad. 40-ft road, south-facing, 36x50 ft, HMDA layout. Well-developed area with G+3 buildings. GHMC permissions are fast. I pay vacant land tax regularly, but mutation proceedings are still pending. Who is the competent authority for mutation? Planning to sell.CH VISHNU MURTHY Rtd Executive Engineer .