Anonymous
17 November 2009 at 10:58
Sirs, As I have been guided by the experts here, I am at the stage of filing an affidavit in proof of evidence in support of claim in the complaint, filed by me in District Consumer Forum. My question here is that am I reuired to file all the documents once again with the said affidavit, in spite of the fact that I had already produced copies along with my orinal application ? I may also please be guided, as to whether my affidavit should contain para by para the repitition the original application ? Should my affidavit mention the prayers again ? Please enlighten me and oblige. Regards to all-Mr.Boda.
G V S Jagannadha Rao
17 November 2009 at 09:26
Dear friends,
Some judicial officer hear cases and reserve the Judgement or order, but do not pronounce the order / Judgement within a reasonable time. It is noticed that some officers suo motu reopen the cases, note the docket as heard and again reserve the matter for Orders.
In some cases, for want of orders in time, the parties suffer heavy and irreparable loss.
I invite your expert comments on how to effectively face the situation within the parameters of law and without resorting to any questionable methods.
Brothers kindly note that I am not expecting suggestions like complain to High Court etc.
Dr.Gaurang N. Gandhi
17 November 2009 at 08:42
If there is a contract performed by two parties regarding sell of goods at certained quality and as per the agreed prise. the buye handedover a cheque for the same at full payment in advance.
Now the saller delivered the goods in infirior quality.
In there agreemnt the saler is agreed to deposit the cheque only after delivery of the goods.
on delivery the buyer called the bank for stop-payment regarding the cheque handed over to the saler, by giving the ssaid cheque number.
at the same time he also inform the saler not to deposit the said cheque in the bank on the reason that the goods is not as per the sample quality.
dispite of that the saller deposit the same cheque in bank for payment of that.
the cheque is returned on the endorsement of stopped payment..
ON this the saller filed a suit in court.
Q1. can he has right?
2. what are the remedies for the buyer?
3. any extra suggestion both the side for saller and the buyer side.....
Dr.Gaurang N. Gandhi
17 November 2009 at 08:40
If there is a contract performed by two parties regarding sell of goods at certained quality and as per the agreed prise. the buye handedover a cheque for the same at full payment in advance.
Now the saller delivered the goods in infirior quality.
In there agreemnt the saler is agreed to deposit the cheque only after delivery of the goods.
on delivery the buyer called the bank for stop-payment regarding the cheque handed over to the saler, by giving the ssaid cheque number.
at the same time he also inform the saler not to deposit the said cheque in the bank on the reason that the goods is not as per the sample quality.
dispite of that the saller deposit the same cheque in bank for payment of that.
the cheque is returned on the endorsement of stopped payment..
ON this the saller filed a suit in court.
Q1. can he has right?
2. what are the remedies for the buyer?
3. any extra suggestion both the side for saller and the buyer side.....
Anonymous
17 November 2009 at 07:15
Dear Friends,
I have joined LCI recently and was fascinated by the content of this site. It is a very useful site.
However, in the EXPERT section, I find some advises which are not expected from an EXPERT LAWYER.
I hope you will agree with me that there is a need to keep up the falling standards in our profession. If not the reputation of lawyers will be damaged beyond repair.
I invite expert opinion of my brother lawyers on enhancing the standards of the profession.
I also take this opportunity to appeal to the management of this website to consider having a moderator to check this.
Kindly note that my intention is only to enhance the standards of this good website but not to criticise or demean any member.
Anonymous
17 November 2009 at 00:45
no action is taken by mcd against complaint of illegal construction how can i force them to take action within time limit i can use rti what after it if nothing happen
Karunakar
17 November 2009 at 00:44
Dear Sir,
I had a plan to Purchase a Flat,
A flat was selected by me and as a part of initial payment I made some payment to Builder.(There are 4 Active and 4 Sleeping partners in the Venture)
Due to Recession, the Project could not materialize...
We made a payment in OCT2008; since the project (total 110 flats) was not materliaze...we demanded our money back from builder.
Builder agreed to give us money in July.
From then he was keep on postponing the date. we were behind him asking for the post dated cheques..
Builder at last gave a post dated Cheque for 1/4th of the amount we paid.
Cheque given to us in OCT-2009, Dated for Nov 10th.
I have deposited the cheque on 12th Nov.
Cheque got bounced by saying "Insufficient funds".
How should I go legally to get my money back?
Should I use IPC 420 and 138?
Is IPC-420 is Non-bailable ?
Thank you for your valuable time...
Waiting for you answers...
Thank you
Anonymous
17 November 2009 at 00:42
how can we fix the time limit for police for taking action in our complaint
Anonymous
17 November 2009 at 00:40
in what circumstances we can directly approach to magistrate
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
How to get a declaration about date of birth from the Court
My date of Birth has been wrongly stated in my passport compared to the date of birth in the birth certificate now they are demanding a declaration from the court as to the correct date of birth? what is the procedure for the same & whom should i approach?