Anonymous
31 January 2010 at 21:05
COURT FEE PAID IN BANK IN COURT ACCOUNT,BUT NOT USEDIT. What is the procedure to get back that amount .Please inform in detail.
M.RAVINDER BABU.ADVOCATE
PARKAL DIST .WARANGAL.AP.
9885627313
I.V. CHANDRA SEKHAR
31 January 2010 at 20:21
I have attend an Interview through a job consultancy 2 months ago. As per the mail from Job Consultant, the company will reimburse the travel expenses while attend the interview either IInd AC Train fare or Volvo Bus charges. Till date, no amount received from the company. Company Representative draging the issue. How to get my money from the company? Please guide me in this regard.
P. Venu
31 January 2010 at 20:16
Can a serving public servant file PIL against vexatious litigation being indulged by the Department he is serving? The grounds proposed to be highlight are that the facts are incomplete, misleading and false and the laws, misstated.
M Ravinder Babu Advocate Parka
31 January 2010 at 20:05
WETHER SIMALTAINIOUS AREST AND ATTACHNENT CAN BE ORDERED IN FAILURE OF NON PAYMENT OF MAINTAINENCE AMOUNT TO THE WIFE IN DV ACT. M.RAVINDER BABU
ADVOCATE PARKAL
DIST. WARANGAL AP
9885627313
M Ravinder Babu Advocate Parka
31 January 2010 at 20:04
WETHER SIMALTAINIOUS AREST AND ATTACHNENT CAN BE ORDERED IN FAILURE OF NON PAYMENT OF MAINTAINENCE AMOUNT TO THE WIFE IN DV ACT. M.RAVINDER BABU
ADVOCATE PARKAL
DIST. WARANGAL AP
9885627313
M Ravinder Babu Advocate Parka
31 January 2010 at 19:55
wether contempt of court is a penal act ?
Is it codified ?
M.RAVINDER BABU
ADVOCATE PARKAL
DIST. WARANGAL AP
9885627313
M Ravinder Babu Advocate Parka
31 January 2010 at 19:45
CAN ANY SAY LOCUP RULES AND THE DUTIES OF S.H.O IN IMPLEMENTING THE SAME.How many can be acomidated in locUp rooms present existing in police stations?
Anonymous
31 January 2010 at 19:32
Why the acts extends to the entire India except to the Jammu & Kashmeer
PRANAV S THAKKAR
31 January 2010 at 19:32
SIR, HERE A CASE OF NEGTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT SECTION 138, HERE THERE IS A LOAN TAKEN ON LAND. THEN AS PER SECURITY, CHEQUES WERE GIVEN BY THE DEBITOR WHO IS ACCUSED, WITH HIS SIGN. BANKER HAD MADE MISTAKE TO WRITE DATE, N THEN WRITTEN A DATE THERE. BUT NOT TAKEN THE SIGN OF THE ACCUSED NEAR THE CORRECTION, THEN HE WAS A BANKER, SO, HE SEND CHEQUE TO CASHIER, HE RETURENED THE CHEQUE WITH WORDS" INSUFFICIANT FUND" N MADE COMPLAINT. CAN WE MAKE DEFANCE, CINSIDERING IF THERE IS NOT SIGN THERE, WHERE IT IS NECESSARY. CAN I HAVE DEFANCE ON BASES OF THAT?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
disciplinary proceeding
By my order dt.15.01.07 I decided a representation in compliance of Hon'ble High court order dated 24.07.04
Govt. issued an order dt.27.02.09 quashing my above order dt.15.01.07
Agrieved party filed a w.p.no.1844/09 in High court.Hon'ble High court passed an order/judgement dt.15.05.09 and was pleased to quash the Govt. order dt.27.02.09 and directed o.p. no.1 Govt.to decide by reasoned order.in this order Hon'ble High court observed that Director(I)was well entitled to decide the representation as it was in compliance of High court order dt.24.07.04
Even though Govt. has charge sheeted me and the charge framed against me is that'I was not entitled to decide the issue.'
My queries are:
(1)Is it not contempt of court?
(2)in comliance of High court' order dt.15.05.09 Govt had decided the matter by order dt 21.07.09 quashing my order dt.15.01.07 but charge sheet against me was issued earlier on 08.06.09 by Govt.
(3)In another w.p.no.5241/09 Hon'ble High court has stayed Govt. order dt.21.07.09 and w.p. is pending.
(4)consiquently my order dt.15.01.07 is prevailing even though I am facing disciplinary proceeding on the above charge.
pl.suggest legal position and how should I
defend myself from above charge