Aruna
13 February 2010 at 06:43
Que.1.Can any Expert explain the Process involved in the non payment of maintenance under Cr P C Section 125 and execution process of Arrest warrant and how long does that take?
Dadi Uma Mahesh
13 February 2010 at 06:37
Can maintenance payment be done through Cheque payment?
Anonymous
13 February 2010 at 01:44
Dears
Plz let me know what is the postition of law as to renewal of rental agreement of a residentail property in bangalore after the termination of the rental agreement.
Points to be answered:
Is the new rental agreement required to be executed to continue in the schedule property.
Regards.
Anonymous
13 February 2010 at 00:40
A case had been registered against me and my old parents under Section 498a based on false allegations.
The petitioner refused to honour the marriage as she realised that she would not be able to give up her independent way of life at Chandigarh and relocate. As she is in service she could not demand maintenance; but she & her family wanted to terrorize & extort money from me. I did not give in to their demand for money and they filed a case under section 498a, in addition to annulment case in family court.
She did not stay with me even for a day. As I presented my case in family court stating true facts, she had no other option but to state that the allegations were due to 'misunderstanding' and got the annulment. However, the section 498a case could not be settled on the same day as the case had got transferred to a different court.
Now that she has got the annulment, she or her parents are not responding to JMC (judicial magistrate court) summons. Summons have returned as 'Not served' 4 times. Chances are they have shifted residence or using some other foul means to avoid summons and we are stuck with this section 498a case.
She had given Deposition before family court judge that allegations filed under section 498a were due to 'misunderstanding' and she would not pursue that case (we have certified copy of that). She had also given a written declaration to old JMC stating she would not pursue section 498a case.
New JMC wants the Petitioner or a witness to give declaration before the court in person that they would not pursue the section 498a case. She & her parents are taking advantage of this requirement to harass us and prolong the case.
Please let us know what's the best way to get this case closed. We have certified copies of Family court judgement of annulment due to non-consummation of marriage and petitioner's deposition before family court.
Please let me know if you need any other clarification to give proper advice.
Anonymous
12 February 2010 at 22:43
sir ,I got a plot in my name from my father in 1999 and i wish to build a house in it I am the only son and eldest child to my parents,
I am the only person who is supporting the family by working,I have 2 younger sisters and mother .My father has not given us any other property and he stays with another women elsewhere.
It is a 'gift deed' from my father and he had it registered at the sro,I have two sisters who are majors and they do not want to claim any share from it.
I would like to know the procedure for dakhil khariz procedure in the registrar of land office.
Can my mother or sisters get it done for me or do I have to go in person to get it done .I am not able to take leave or travel frequently to my native place where the plot is located due to workload and financial reasons.
please let me know the documents etc required to get it done.thank you.
Anonymous
12 February 2010 at 22:03
Hi !One of my friend entered into sale agreement with a Builder in the year 1994- he paid about 80% of the amt by 2000. In the year he executed another agreement with a Builder for payment of stamp Duty and registration of document.
My friend sold the flat in the year 2002 to a third party- my friend showed the Gain on the ransacion as ong term capital gain and invested the amt in tax saving bonds
The ITO at the time of assessment treated the amt as short term capital gain computing the period of holding from the second agreement instead of 1st agreement citing the date of possession is the date from where the period o holding is to be counted.
The second agreement is verbatim reproduction of the 1st agreement, however no mention of this agrement is made in the second agreement-however the mention of the 1st agreement is made in the sale agreement executed in the year 2002.
My query is- if the stanad of ITO is correct.
I understand the definton of Capital Asset also inludes the right in the property- pl give some ctiation case laws to defend before appellate authorities.
Anonymous
12 February 2010 at 21:40
dear experts please provide your valuable suggestion on the following in respect of preventation of corruption Act.
the Managing Director of a public sector Bank misused his position by allowing two VIP Guest Houses (one at Mumbai and another at New Delhi) meant for official use of top exexutive of the bank for the personal use by his family members for more than two years.
in another instance He has arranged the banks BOD meeting at his choice place to facilitate the arrival bank's top executives and officers to attend his son Marriage.the meeting was previously scheduled to be held at Mumbai but subsequently he changed the meeting place to Hyderabad and also the date of the meeting so that bank official can attend the marriage in the name of BOD meeting at Hyderabad at huge bank's cost. whether these kind of abuse of position amount to offence under the preventation of corruption act ? pl advise
k.k.jandial
12 February 2010 at 21:12
sirs,
Can some one give me the contact details of Advocates practising at chandigarh in conumer laws and RTI act and oblidge.
Thanking you.
K.K.Jandial
barun deka
12 February 2010 at 19:12
whether in a partition suit all the properties are to be joined together in the suit? any precedents??
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Admission in law stream
In India any one gets graduation degree in any stream with less then 45% marks will not eligible for admission in LLB as directed by Bar Council of India.
Is it right?