Anonymous
25 May 2010 at 14:02
I would like to know what are the RBI guidelines and procedure for registering a company for NBFC
SUVIGYASAXENA
25 May 2010 at 13:51
My co. placed the order for puchasing of cloth for spcified quantity,Co. made an advance. On inspection it was OK but on delivery we found that it was not as per the specifications, order cancelled at that moment we have reports of Northetn India Textile Research Association, shows that counts , Mass , Density is not same as per the specifications mentioned in the perchase order, our purchase order was changed by making forged sign and mentioning the changed specifications of quality, party is claming for balance amt. of payment. kindly send your advice at the earliest.
akash
25 May 2010 at 13:10
sir, i have made an agreement with my debtor on Rs 10 stamp paper.date of purchase of stamp paper is 20th january 2008 and the agreement was executed on 5th may 2009. Now the validity of my agreement is being questioned as it is being said that the validity of stamp paper is only six months in west bengal.kindly advice that is the validity of stamp paper in west bengal.
Anonymous
25 May 2010 at 13:02
Hi. A person is claiming Indian citizenship of the basis of having an illegitimate child (Out of a living relationship). Can such person get citizenship??
Also the woman (who is an Indian) is now claiming rights over his property (in India and abroad) on the basis of living relationship?? Can such woman or her child claim right over his property (both in India & abroad).
Jagmohan Rawat
25 May 2010 at 13:01
Hi friends,
Pls let me know if there is any judgement in case of stay petition filed in the court against the direction of the A.O. for conducting special audit u/s 142(2A) and hearing fixed on the petition after 6 months, how the period of limitation of 180 days for furnishing audit report will be computed in such situation. The assessee has not initiated to get his accounts audited as he has preferred the said petition to challenge the special audit direction by the A.O.
Regards,
Jagmohan Rawat
VIJAY K. TEOTIA
25 May 2010 at 12:50
A dispute regarding non performance of a machinery arises. what is the proper forum for filing such complaint. is it consumer court or before MRTP. I understand that MRTP has been subsituted with Competition Act. What type of disputes may be referred under competition act and before which forum.
Anonymous
25 May 2010 at 12:46
i had booked a undeconstruction property at sonipat haryana , and paid full and final amount and taken the rebate for the same now the builder has postporn the possesion by 16 months , can i claim the interest on the amount paid by me
indeep arora
Anonymous
25 May 2010 at 12:45
Hi,Iam a Cost Accountant & CA Inter.I want to know whether doing a Masters in Business Law from National Law School carries the same weightage as the LLB?Is it good enough to start practicing as a Business Law Consultant?Can anyone guide me.
VIJAY K. TEOTIA
25 May 2010 at 12:33
In an agreement with foreign company, which law will govern the performance and execution of agreement. the place of execution is a foreign country. indian company will provide consultancy services along with deputing its employees for technical working of the foreign company. further for arbitration at a neutral country by which law such proceedings will be governed.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Registrability of notification under 4(1) of LA Act1894
Pl. refer the judgments of the following cases:
a. Bombay High Court: WP 3031 of 2004
b. Supreme Court: SC 540- 1996
c. Supreme Court: SC 812-1995
d. Madras High Court: WP 4417 of 1997)
In all these cases alienation of title of land has happened after 4(1) notification.
In all these cases such notifications have not been registered. Had the notification under 4(1) been registered, such alienations would not have happened in any of those cases.
Such alienations have been happening probably for over a century and even till date. In all the 4 cases cited, such alienations have been declared void and thus the person who bought such notified land unaware of the LA proceedings pending behind such lands, is deprived of his right to property without any compensation at all for no known fault of his.
In land acquisition laws in New Zealand or Australia similar notification under similar laws are registrable compulsorily.
So, my contention is that if the registrability or non-registrability of a notification is going to decide the validity of the registered title of a land onwner, such notification should have been categorized as compulsorily registrable by the law of the land concerned.What harm is there on the part of the Government in registering such notifications, especially in light of the fact that such registration would prevent the event of innocent citizens being deprived of their fundamental right to property?