Shilpi Dey
20 April 2011 at 23:36
My client was doing a job in a company from january 1997 to aug 1998. aug 1998 when i went to office my office told me that you don't have to come to office now.and they din't give any reason. sir what should i do.
Anonymous
20 April 2011 at 18:07
The punishing Authority disposed the charges with minor punishment of stoppage of increment for one year without cumulative effect.On appeal, the appellate authority increaed the punishment with stoppage of increment for two years without cumulative effect.Is it right?.If not what is the remedy?
Anonymous
20 April 2011 at 14:32
Hi,
Recently my company announced (on notice board) VRS scheme for one particular category of employees (shop floor workers) in only one unit. Can company do this? though the employees in other categories and units are eligible as per VRS scheme criteria?.
Please give your opinion.
Regards
Anonymous
20 April 2011 at 14:20
I have completed 7 years and more in one of the Private limited company. After 7 years I given the resignation. When I applied for Gratuity, company told me that present will be required at least 240 days and more in a year. Is it true ?
Can any one guide me what I have to do now.
Anonymous
20 April 2011 at 14:02
Hi,
I have applied for Gratuity to my previous company, now they said you have to complete the min 240 days in a year than, you are applicable for gratuity. Is it true ? can you please explain what should I have to do and what the rules applicable for that.
Govindaradjou
20 April 2011 at 11:28
Sir,
I am an employee of an organisation which is an agency implementing the programmes under external aiding grant-in-aid through GOI. The funds are routed through GOI to all states/U.Ts'.
The EPF Contribution is being deducted from all the employees @ 12% as employee's and remitted into the EPF Account alongwith the same % as employer's contribution since 2004. Now, it has been intimated as a reply to the query by the organisation that the organisation has been excluded from operation of the EPF Act under Sec. 16(2) as per the notification No.S-35015/46/2009-SSII dated 14.05.2010 forwarded by the Ministry of Labour, New Delhi.
In this context, the employer has intimated the EPF Office that no more remittance will be made from April 2011 and also has requested the EPF Office in our state to return back the remittances made as employer contribution since 2004 to the employer's bank account.
Hence, I request you to kindly clarify in detail:
- whether the contribution made in the employees' account be claimed back by the employer for their part of contribution made to the employees.
- Is there any provision in the EPF Act that the contribution be stopped even the operation of contribution remittance is made before the notification date.
- Is there any possibility to bind over the employees by the employer for getting back the employer part of remittances made from the beginning.
- Is there any provision for the employer to get back the remittances made from the existing employees and not from the resigned employees and employees who have claimed the contributions from EPF Account.
Expecting your early reply in clarity and if possible with Sectio(s).
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
G.Govindardjou.
Anonymous
20 April 2011 at 10:45
while executing the employee's agreement what are the important things need to be there?
Anonymous
19 April 2011 at 22:17
It is mixed opinion on PL Encasement that it is done on Basic as well on Gross Salary, if anybody give the strong evidential proof (any notification or Law) which says either of this.
sarfaraz
19 April 2011 at 12:13
thank you for your support thank you for your supportthank you for your supportthank you for your supportthank you for your supportthank you for your supportthank you for your support
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Absconding from employment
What are the laws protecting an employee if he/she absconds from his/her employment on whatsoever reason.