Dear All,
I have a small question w.r.t ancestral property ...
There is an ancestral property(immovable) in India. One person (coparcener) living in India and the other coparcener living in other country trying to acquire the other country citizenship.
My understanding is that... if a person relinquish Indian citizenship(per Constitution) or willing to relinquish Indian Citizenship, then other coparcener looses the right on ancestral property.
Seeking your inputs in case my my understanding is incorrect.
Best Regards,
Sundar
I am a divorcee. It was love marriage.so for that reason she didn't come to my house because my parents oppose the marriage since from beginning.
My divorce was sanctioned in July 2018
now i again want to marry again.I am searching for my match.
My question is whether I should tell my stories or not ,because we never had a social marriage,nor we live together.
If I didn't share my first marriage and later on they came to know about my history what will be the consequences.
N.B : if they didn't get any proof regarding my first marriage,only they can hear from somebody else ,is it possible for litigation?
my father expire in 2002 I was in 2nd yr of graduation
I got job first in 2005 and later completed graduation 2007
my mother did supported me but very less amount and bought own home for her
I did my pg from own money
she did not helped my finding bride and when I found told her to put 498 on me
even put claim on my flat
now she is living on pension
I want to claim on pension part
note: I have done bsc comp sci but many relative done msc comp
what are legal provosions for same
My husband had thrown me out from his home before 5 yr now he had send me divorce notice and had done mairi karar with another lady what can i do
Sirs,
My father, 84, passed away in June 2021. We got our legal heir certificate yesterday. In that, for my mother, 81, (legal wife) marital status is mentioned as "married". Is that correct or should it be "widow".
Will status "married" be misinterpreted as re-married..??
Who is the legal guardian of a Muslim minor after the death of his father and paternal grand father?
My divorce case is in the court. My husband is the petitioner and am the respondent. we are HINDUs.
"Infact all the stridhana property and jewels are with the petitioner's custody with the hope the petitioner would comes out of the tactics played by the petitioner's parents and his brother to break the matrimonial relationship with the respondent and the petitioner."
1) Can you clarify if the above phrase means all stridhana property and all jewels with the petitioner? Or all the stridhana property and some jewels with the petitioner?
2) Is there anything wrong if i say all stridhana property and some 35 sovereigns of gold jewels are with the petitioner? will it contradict with the above phrase?
My lawyer has put the above phrase in our legal notice and am trying to understand how the judge will interpret the same.
Also i did not wanted to say all the gold jewels of my stridhana are with the petitioner. I just wanted to say some jewels are with him.
So, trying to check with you lawyers if there is any issue in saying so if the judge asks about it or the petitioner's lawyer crosses me during the case.
Thanks in advance.
Section 12(1)(c)
Does Application filed under section 12 (1)(c) of Hindu Marriage Act can be settled in Lok Adalat ? The matter is posted to file Written Statement.