Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Vijay Kumar   27 June 2010 at 08:33

Cheque of merged Bank

A cheque dated 10/5/2010 drawn on Centurion Bank of Punjab(CBoP) has been issued.CBoP had merged with HDFC Bank about 2 years ago.Cheque was presented to HDFC Bank on 26/5/2010 and was returned with a report "Account Closed".
What defence,the drawer/accused may take? Kindly suggest.

Anonymous   26 June 2010 at 23:18

Domestic violence case

Husband filed divorce under the ground cruelty against the innocent wife. Thereafter wife filed Domestic Violence Complaint.
Husband filed Quash petition and the same is pending before High Court. Now DV case is stayed by High COurt

During pendancy of both the cases, she committed suicide leaving a letter as dying declaration that her husband only spoiled her life.

Can her father proceed with DV case?

Still one month passed by, no investigation was made on husband.?


Anonymous   26 June 2010 at 22:26

evidence and additional evidence, pt.. u/s.311 and 391

In 138 cases no defence evidence and documents marked in the trial by the accused's counsel and after the completion of trial can we mark documents and evidence in appellate court. if it is any judgments available.

tusharcosmic   26 June 2010 at 19:50

What if one issues me cheque of someone elses's account ?

Will he/she be charged under negoitiable instrument act 138 or 420 or both or none ?

T.R. Ganesan   26 June 2010 at 19:43

Cr. P.C. 156(3) in IPC Section 467

I am inclined to have the legal openion with regard to the Criminal Case pending for trial by the Magisterate. The 2 accused in the matter were in P.C. and MCR as well. Both the accused has been enlarged on bail by the same Magisterate who passed the process under section 156 (3) of Cr. P.C. The accused are professionally teachers in a private School run by the Trusts. Interestngly, the Complainant claiming to be a Treasurer of one of the Trusts in which one of the accused is also a bonafide President and an Assistant Teacher in another School run by another Trust. As per the ltest Schedule I under the Bombay Public Trust Act 1956 Register maintained in the Asst. Chrity Commissioner the Accused is the President and his name is appearing in it. No legal changes are incorporated in the Rgister by the office of the ACC. The legal and original Treasurer is other than the Complainant. The Complainant and other associates now called as Reporting Trustees claiming that they have filed a Change Report with the Assistant Charity Commissioner. They having lost faith and confidence in the proceedings in respect of the Change Report pending with the of the ACC, approached with an Application in the first week of March 2010 to the Charity Commissioner Maharashtra at Mumbai to get transfer the hearing on the Change Report to another ACC. This proceedings are not so far decided, for the reasons the Ld. Commissioner attending to High Court,Mantralaya, on leave extra and the matter is being adjourned week after weeks from March 2010. During the intervening period the Complainant and other associates claiming as President, Secretary, Treasurer approaching all the forums to harass and humilate the real, legally correct and bonafide President who is accused.

My pertinent question is that the said Complainat's instance one socalled Secretary writing a letter enclosing therewith certain documents and the Judgement and Order of the J.M.F.C. to the Principal of the School in which the President is employed as an Assistant Teacher. The Principal issued a Show Cause Notice by not disclosing the basis for initiating disciplinary action from the show cause notice. The socalled Secretary has no locus to write to the Principal and endorsing copies down the line from Education Minister to Education Officer, Zilla Parishad right. Under the circumstances what legal action and/or legal remedy is available for defence?.

I am concerned for the aused employment, The trusts institutions are govt. aided therefore, the salaries are paid by the Government.

Kindly post your valuable advice in the matter.

T.R. Ganesan
Advocate.

T.R. Ganesan   26 June 2010 at 19:40

Cr. P.C. 156(3) in IPC Section 467

I am inclined to have the legal openion with regard to the Criminal Case pending for trial by the Magisterate. The 2 accused in the matter were in P.C. and MCR as well. Both the accused has been enlarged on bail by the same Magisterate who passed the process under section 156 (3) of Cr. P.C. The accused are professionally teachers in a private School run by the Trusts. Interestngly, the Complainant claiming to be a Treasurer of one of the Trusts in which one of the accused is also a bonafide President and an Assistant Teacher in another School run by another Trust. As per the ltest Schedule I under the Bombay Public Trust Act 1956 Register maintained in the Asst. Chrity Commissioner the Accused is the President and his name is appearing in it. No legal changes are incorporated in the Rgister by the office of the ACC. The legal and original Treasurer is other than the Complainant. The Complainant and other associates now called as Reporting Trustees claiming that they have filed a Change Report with the Assistant Charity Commissioner. They having lost faith and confidence in the proceedings in respect of the Change Report pending with the of the ACC, approached with an Application in the first week of March 2010 to the Charity Commissioner Maharashtra at Mumbai to get transfer the hearing on the Change Report to another ACC. This proceedings are not so far decided, for the reasons the Ld. Commissioner attending to High Court,Mantralaya, on leave extra and the matter is being adjourned week after weeks from March 2010. During the intervening period the Complainant and other associates claiming as President, Secretary, Treasurer approaching all the forums to harass and humilate the real, legally correct and bonafide President who is accused.

My pertinent question is that the said Complainat's instance one socalled Secretary writing a letter enclosing therewith certain documents and the Judgement and Order of the J.M.F.C. to the Principal of the School in which the President is employed as an Assistant Teacher. The Principal issued a Show Cause Notice by not disclosing the basis for initiating disciplinary action from the show cause notice. The socalled Secretary has no locus to write to the Principal and endorsing copies down the line from Education Minister to Education Officer, Zilla Parishad right. Under the circumstances what legal action and/or legal remedy is available for defence?.

I am concerned for the aused employment, The trusts institutions are govt. aided therefore, the salaries are paid by the Government.

Kindly post your valuable advice in the matter.

T.R. Ganesan
Advocate.

dipankar   26 June 2010 at 15:46

obscene messages

what ipc sections can be lodged for sending obscene messages on mobile.

Anonymous   26 June 2010 at 14:39

JURISDICTION

I have problem with one intermediateries which is registered as Limited company with Stock Exchange. I want to Police complaint against Directors of the company. As per jurisdiction, I have to file FIR with Police Station A. But P I not ready apply certain IPC Section which can harm my case fact. Can I file complaint from other police Station B or likewise instead of A. Can I do this and what will be effects of ?

Thanks in advance,
Reetu

Anonymous   26 June 2010 at 13:57

Bail Application - U/S. 376

A was the relative of B. B was 16 years old. A gave something to eat to B. Therafter B became unconscious and then A committed Rape on B. A was arrestted easily and has been charged U/S. 376. After some time, B dies natural death. A is in jail since last one year. What could be conditions & requirements of Bail in High Court, as he has already been denied bail by sessions court.

Anonymous   26 June 2010 at 13:02

about termination of bail given by C.J.M

a bail granted by cjm u/s 498ipc.is it possible for cjm to terminate it.

condition:- on pledge paper the sign. of pledgee was not mentioned & it is verifier by adv. (concerned autho.)