T.R. Ganesan
26 June 2010 at 19:43
I am inclined to have the legal openion with regard to the Criminal Case pending for trial by the Magisterate. The 2 accused in the matter were in P.C. and MCR as well. Both the accused has been enlarged on bail by the same Magisterate who passed the process under section 156 (3) of Cr. P.C. The accused are professionally teachers in a private School run by the Trusts. Interestngly, the Complainant claiming to be a Treasurer of one of the Trusts in which one of the accused is also a bonafide President and an Assistant Teacher in another School run by another Trust. As per the ltest Schedule I under the Bombay Public Trust Act 1956 Register maintained in the Asst. Chrity Commissioner the Accused is the President and his name is appearing in it. No legal changes are incorporated in the Rgister by the office of the ACC. The legal and original Treasurer is other than the Complainant. The Complainant and other associates now called as Reporting Trustees claiming that they have filed a Change Report with the Assistant Charity Commissioner. They having lost faith and confidence in the proceedings in respect of the Change Report pending with the of the ACC, approached with an Application in the first week of March 2010 to the Charity Commissioner Maharashtra at Mumbai to get transfer the hearing on the Change Report to another ACC. This proceedings are not so far decided, for the reasons the Ld. Commissioner attending to High Court,Mantralaya, on leave extra and the matter is being adjourned week after weeks from March 2010. During the intervening period the Complainant and other associates claiming as President, Secretary, Treasurer approaching all the forums to harass and humilate the real, legally correct and bonafide President who is accused.
My pertinent question is that the said Complainat's instance one socalled Secretary writing a letter enclosing therewith certain documents and the Judgement and Order of the J.M.F.C. to the Principal of the School in which the President is employed as an Assistant Teacher. The Principal issued a Show Cause Notice by not disclosing the basis for initiating disciplinary action from the show cause notice. The socalled Secretary has no locus to write to the Principal and endorsing copies down the line from Education Minister to Education Officer, Zilla Parishad right. Under the circumstances what legal action and/or legal remedy is available for defence?.
I am concerned for the aused employment, The trusts institutions are govt. aided therefore, the salaries are paid by the Government.
Kindly post your valuable advice in the matter.
T.R. Ganesan
Advocate.
T.R. Ganesan
26 June 2010 at 19:40
I am inclined to have the legal openion with regard to the Criminal Case pending for trial by the Magisterate. The 2 accused in the matter were in P.C. and MCR as well. Both the accused has been enlarged on bail by the same Magisterate who passed the process under section 156 (3) of Cr. P.C. The accused are professionally teachers in a private School run by the Trusts. Interestngly, the Complainant claiming to be a Treasurer of one of the Trusts in which one of the accused is also a bonafide President and an Assistant Teacher in another School run by another Trust. As per the ltest Schedule I under the Bombay Public Trust Act 1956 Register maintained in the Asst. Chrity Commissioner the Accused is the President and his name is appearing in it. No legal changes are incorporated in the Rgister by the office of the ACC. The legal and original Treasurer is other than the Complainant. The Complainant and other associates now called as Reporting Trustees claiming that they have filed a Change Report with the Assistant Charity Commissioner. They having lost faith and confidence in the proceedings in respect of the Change Report pending with the of the ACC, approached with an Application in the first week of March 2010 to the Charity Commissioner Maharashtra at Mumbai to get transfer the hearing on the Change Report to another ACC. This proceedings are not so far decided, for the reasons the Ld. Commissioner attending to High Court,Mantralaya, on leave extra and the matter is being adjourned week after weeks from March 2010. During the intervening period the Complainant and other associates claiming as President, Secretary, Treasurer approaching all the forums to harass and humilate the real, legally correct and bonafide President who is accused.
My pertinent question is that the said Complainat's instance one socalled Secretary writing a letter enclosing therewith certain documents and the Judgement and Order of the J.M.F.C. to the Principal of the School in which the President is employed as an Assistant Teacher. The Principal issued a Show Cause Notice by not disclosing the basis for initiating disciplinary action from the show cause notice. The socalled Secretary has no locus to write to the Principal and endorsing copies down the line from Education Minister to Education Officer, Zilla Parishad right. Under the circumstances what legal action and/or legal remedy is available for defence?.
I am concerned for the aused employment, The trusts institutions are govt. aided therefore, the salaries are paid by the Government.
Kindly post your valuable advice in the matter.
T.R. Ganesan
Advocate.
dipankar
26 June 2010 at 15:46
what ipc sections can be lodged for sending obscene messages on mobile.
Anonymous
26 June 2010 at 14:39
I have problem with one intermediateries which is registered as Limited company with Stock Exchange. I want to Police complaint against Directors of the company. As per jurisdiction, I have to file FIR with Police Station A. But P I not ready apply certain IPC Section which can harm my case fact. Can I file complaint from other police Station B or likewise instead of A. Can I do this and what will be effects of ?
Thanks in advance,
Reetu
Anonymous
26 June 2010 at 13:57
A was the relative of B. B was 16 years old. A gave something to eat to B. Therafter B became unconscious and then A committed Rape on B. A was arrestted easily and has been charged U/S. 376. After some time, B dies natural death. A is in jail since last one year. What could be conditions & requirements of Bail in High Court, as he has already been denied bail by sessions court.
Anonymous
26 June 2010 at 13:02
a bail granted by cjm u/s 498ipc.is it possible for cjm to terminate it.
condition:- on pledge paper the sign. of pledgee was not mentioned & it is verifier by adv. (concerned autho.)
Anonymous
26 June 2010 at 12:58
a bail granted by cjm u/s 498ipc.is it possible for cjm to terminate it.
condition:- on pledge paper the sign. of pledgee was not mentioned & it is verifier by adv. (concerned autho.)
Anonymous
26 June 2010 at 11:57
DEAR EXPERTS,
I WANT TO CHANGE CASTE SC TO BC IN ANDRA.P STATE WHAT IS THE PROCEDURE TO CHANGE ?
IS IT POSSIBLE
I USED SC RESERVATION FOR SCOLORSHIP
IF I WISH TO CHANGE LIKE THAT WHAT HAPPEN TO ME
Anonymous
26 June 2010 at 08:15
my house was searched by police from outstation by search warrant issued from the court. During the search the local police, my estranged wife who got the search order and the outstation police were present. the outstation police had asked the local police to accompany them. During the search for my wife things... the entire proceedings was video taped by a person whom we didnt know but was with the police.... my wife was accompanied by her lawyer who refused to be identifed during the search and was there during the entire search.
1. Can the local police also be there for the search along with police authorirsed for search?
2. can this search be videotaped? if yes by whom? can wife arrange the search to be videotaped or only police can? does she have the right?
3. can her lawyer come to my house during search and be there during search? if not can i ask her lawyer to leave my house?
4. Can I ask for copy of the video tape taken during search and also details of persons present during search through RTI?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
What if one issues me cheque of someone elses's account ?
Will he/she be charged under negoitiable instrument act 138 or 420 or both or none ?