Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

vinod bansal   28 June 2010 at 22:11

Appeal/Revision against order of releaseing the convict on p

R/Expert
In a pvt complaint case,accused were held guilty u/ss 323/503/324 IPc and were released on probation by the ld magistrate,A fine of Rs. 7000/- was also imposed on convict.complainant want to file appeal/revision against this order for enhancement/alter the sentence in imprisonment & fine.What is remedy available him.He have to move directly Highcourt or there is any provision of filing appeal or revision in given circumstanses.Kindly suggest.Thanx

Anonymous   28 June 2010 at 12:41

compromise in IPC 120B

Is there possible that compromise in IPC Act 120 B $ 406.

Anonymous   28 June 2010 at 11:12

Recording Statement

I was called as witness to PS to one of my known person who booked in 498a.
Now SHO wants to record my statement.

Will this ends here or do I need to attend during the trial too? Please clarify

Rgds
Sam

Anonymous   28 June 2010 at 09:11

trial

What happens in this situation?

1) Lower court trial on 498a by defacto complainant
2) Quash proceedings in HC by opponent

Will both parties will go to HC
OR
Will both cases will individually run until judgement?

Anonymous   28 June 2010 at 09:08

Quash

Whats the procedure in 498a quash

Will the quash case can be filled in HC even chargesheet has not been done by PS?

Or quash is depended on chargesheet sent to the court by SHO?

Anonymous   27 June 2010 at 23:50

420

hi

Anonymous   27 June 2010 at 22:55

498a trial

1) Who attends the court from petitioner's side
Is it the woman or PS SHO?

2) Does PP or govt pleader would represent womans side?

md.shafi   27 June 2010 at 22:55

marking doc and reexamine or retrail

In course of business some transaction between accused and complainant. whenever the complainant send goods the accused paid amount through bank. later the complainant asked guarantee for future transaction and the accused gave 20 cheques immediately after receiving the cheques he deposited in his bank all the cheques dishonored in the mean time the accused sent letter for return back the cheques and also complaint lodged against the complainant. when the trail was commenced the accused advocate not bring the fact of case before trail court and not marking the documents and examined any DW witnesses including accused in the trail he was convicted. now the case in the appeal stage i through that 311 and 391 petition to be filed for marking doc and reexamine or any chance for retrial ---- any suggestions and also give any favorable judgments

Global   27 June 2010 at 20:24

Defamation claim

We purchased some products from our supplier for around 5 lacs, the chq was bounced and we had given 2 chqs. of 2 lacs and 3 lacs for the above dishonour. We requested them to present the chq with confirmation. They also agreed. They asked for confirmation to present the chqs after a month. We requested to present the 3 lacs chq and hold the 2 lacs chq. they also presented and the same was honoured. After some days suddenly they present the 2 lacs chq without our knowledge which in turn got bounced. Shall we raise a defamation claim against the supplier. The communications between us are through e-mail.
Pls. help to proceed.

pkm   27 June 2010 at 10:52

cheque bounced cases

What will be the fate of cheuque bounced cases filled by the company itself wind up ?