Anonymous
08 September 2010 at 18:24
can a magistrate grant bail in non bailable case where the bail petition is moved without advocate and even the hearing was done without the presence of an advocate
Anonymous
08 September 2010 at 16:21
JMFC court has in a case send the arested accused on three days remand while the person was booked under bailable section of IPC was this action of the JMFC justified
Anonymous
08 September 2010 at 13:30
Mr Expert’s
Respected Sir,
I Consultants Two Wheeler Finance Company.
My Consultant Company Finance office at Jaipur Loan Give Costmer Under “ Loan Cum Hypothecation Agreement” at Bhinmal Costmber.
But Costumer Not Paid Installment of Due payment and Not Possible Repossession of Two wheeler.
I Want File Compliant before Court Under Section 406 and 420 IPC ( and another section apply plz information me).
If possible I file compliant before court. If yes, plz send draft of agreement.
Whose Court have power (Jaipur/Bhinmal).
Please,Pleaese Guide me.
With Warm Regard’s
maneet pruthi
08 September 2010 at 08:10
my next hearing date of sec 138 on 10th of sep.but i already pay my dues as mentioned in the settlement letter. and the bank says that they mailed the lawyer to withdraw the case and by ninth I get my n.o.c letter. so I still needs to go the the court on that date or not....... how can i know that they withdraw the case ..as if mentioned in the settlement letter that after sttling my dues they withdraw the cases running in the court of law against me so this is enough reason for me to not to go to the date on 10.answer please
M/s. Y-not legal services
08 September 2010 at 00:21
good evevning everybody.. for a cheque complaint, we issued a legal notice in time.. but the notice returned as "addressee left". now whats the time limit for file my complaint before the concern judicial magistrate. for example.. i received the returned legal notice covers on 15.07.2010 mean which date is last date.. please reply me.. i am very confusion.. morning i have to file this complaint..
Anonymous
07 September 2010 at 20:09
Is essential or mandatory for high court bench to go through merit of case before dismissing Interlocutory application for condonation of delay in filing appeal against
aquittal?.
Will it not amount to accepting or
admitting the appeal under sec 378(4) of cr
pc 1973?
Is there any citation of SCI upholding decision of High court bench order
dismissing SLP against Highcourt judgment
not condoning the delay?
Anonymous
07 September 2010 at 18:43
IF ANY ADVOCATE IS AN ACCUSED IN A STATE CASE AND ANOTHER ADVOCATE IS COMPLAINANT IN THAT STATE CASE,THEN WORDS 'SH.' AND 'ADVOCATE' WILL BE WRITTEN BEFORE AND AFTER RESPECTVILY IN ATTENDENCE OF ANY OF THEM IN COURT'S FILE OR NOT.PLEASE DO GIVE REPLY WITH RULLINGS.
Anonymous
07 September 2010 at 18:38
IF AN ADVOCATE IS AN ACCUSED IN A STATE CASE,THEN WORDS 'SH.' AND 'ADVOCATE' WILL BE WRITTEN BEFORE AND AFTER RESPECTVILY IN HIS ATTENDENCE IN COURT'S FILE OR NOT.PLEASE DO GIVE REPLY WITH RULLINGS.
Anonymous
07 September 2010 at 18:35
IF AN ADVOCATE IS AN ACCUSEC IN A STATE CASE,THEN WORDS 'SH.' AND 'ADVOCATE' WILL BE WRITTEN BEFORE AND AFTER RESPECTVILY IN HIS ATTENDENCE IN COURT'S FILE OR NOT.PLEASE DO GIVE REPLY WITH RULLINGS.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
notice u/s 138 Negotiable instrument Act
notice had been sended u/s 138 N.i.Act but the name of the bank has been wrongly mentioned, again a notice has been sended for clearification that read the name of the bank so and so in place of so and so in the original notice. is it legally correct?