a police officer denied to take FIR, SP also didn't take action positively, The victim applied to THE Chief Judicial Magistrate for registeration of FIR u/s 156(3) of CrPC. the CJM rejected the prayer. What remedy left for the victim.
Deva
06 September 2010 at 14:30
In a criminal case, does our laws allow the client himself to argue without appointing a lawyer?
Anonymous
06 September 2010 at 08:50
Sir, my husband signed and gave a cheque issued in my favour by the bank authorities with out my knowledge for the discharge of his debt decreed by the civil court and now they filed a case u/sec 138 against me...am i be liable for that act.....kindly guide me properly
Whether it is mandatory for IO to record the statement of accused before submitting charge sheet against him. If not recorded and submits the chargesheet, what remedies are available to such accused.
Police filed a charge sheet u/s 420/467/468/471 . The court issued BW against the accused . However accused noticed from the case diary as submitted by police to the court that police has falsely recorded his statement in his diary that he has confessed his offence. Now what remedies are availabe to the accused . Whether he can file any application to the lower court objecting about his statement recorded by police before bail application. OR he can refer the matter to higher police authorities / state for re-investigation of the case by recording his corrcet statement.
Narain chand mittal
05 September 2010 at 20:33
AS I am not registered as expert in this column. So i am giving my opinion in this query forum, if anybody disagree with me after going through the cited citation, please let me know with reason.
Yes, a private complaint can be maintable for offences committed in the court like 193,195,196,209 IPC as per five judge bench of Honourable Supreme Court in a case named Iqbal Singh Marwah and Anr. Vs Meenakshi Marwah and Anr Decided On: 11.03.2005 cited AIR2005SC2119.
Narain chand mittal
05 September 2010 at 19:45
one sends notice to another in an Envelop actually putting notice in it, but other side giving reply that he got empty envelop(for just buying the time or whatever may be reason). My First question is what to do in this matter, one simple answer may be "send another copy" but I want to know if there is any other answers. My second and most important question is what should a person sending notice do at the time of sending notice, so that after getting notice, if one denies, it can be proved that notice was sent in envelop and it is not an empty envelop, in another words how can it be proved that notice is actually sent and it is not an empty envelop, what to do at the time of sending notice so that even if after getting notice, it is replied that envelop in an empty one, it can be proved that it is not empty one.
quashing of camplaint
A CHEQUE WAS DISHONORED AND THE PAYEE SENDS A LEGAL NOTICE ( THROUGH ITS ADVOCATE ) TO THE PERSON WHOSE CHEQUE WAS DISHONORED BUT THE NOTICE WHICH WAS SEND WAS NOT ON THE ADVOCATES PAD AND ON THAT NOTICE NUMBER ALLOTTED TO ADVOCATE WAS ALSO NOT MENTIONED. A COMPLAINT WAS REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I.ACT. CAN IT BE QUASHED ON ABOVE BASIS ?PLEASE PROVIDE CITATION ALSO IF THERE IS ANY.