vinod bansal
13 September 2009 at 22:55
R/Members
My client mortgaged his land & obtained loan of Rs. 50000/- 13 years back,he had not made any instalement even bank also never send him any notice,latter or reminder or a/c statement till today from the advancement of loan,now my client wants to get return his original sale deed which is still lying with bank,bank has finally declined in writing his oral as well as through legal notice request,further my client has made a alternative request to bank give him only sale deed number or xerox of this sale deed so that he can demarcate his land because he was away from the city for a long time & he could not visit at mortgaged land & now he can not rightly demarcate his land without property land,my client wants to secure his land & this is possible after getting copy of sale deed,but bank has refused to give him no. or copy of sale deed,what is legal position/remedy in such facts.further is it time bar (more than 12 years )case & is it right that now bank cannot claim recovery of loan amount from my client?kindly help.Regardsriven
SHAKILA
13 September 2009 at 21:04
LATEST SUPREME COURT AND MADRAS HIGH COURT JUDGMENTS ON THIS TOPIC.riven
s.s.m.rajan
13 September 2009 at 00:53
in tamilnadu, state transport introducing air buses to all region. at the same time, they reduces ordinary buses. due to this poor people are severely affected. they facing huge in bus fare. now what is the provision for solve this problem?riven
Ann Delorme
12 September 2009 at 23:38
What can an investor do in the case of a bounced company cheque and the company does not declare bankruptcy but is going in for restructuring?
What about breach of trust of a signed agreement between the investor and the company, wherein the company agrees to give a certain amount of interest every month for a certain period but fails to stick to the agreement.In such a case what can the investor do?riven
Soma
12 September 2009 at 14:56
It is the general rule that pleading must contain statement of fact only. But I have seen advocates including case laws in written statements, objections and plaint. Am little b it confused. Can any body explain? whether case law can be included in pleading?riven
Pramod Harkisondas Divecha
12 September 2009 at 11:45
Bombay Court Fees Act 1959, was amended and revised fees were prescribed with effect from 1st October, 2001. I would like to know whether there have been any subsequent amendments/revisions? If so, what are the rates currently in force and where to locate them.
Also, are there any process fees involved?How are these determined? Are they substantial?riven
Amandeep Singh
12 September 2009 at 10:04
Sir,
I need your suggestion on the following matter :
My father got property share under arbitration award between three of the brothers including my father, but after the award got registered and became a decree and my father's brother challenged by giving objection petition on some false grounds claiming large amount of money from us and finally in order to settle the dispute we admit to give the amount of Rs549000 on sale of our property in which we are living and he is also living with us in a room occupied by him.Now when we are ready to sell our house he is demanding 8 lacs more to vacate the property otherwise he will get the property auctioned for recovering his claim but we are ready to give him Rs 549000 if he leaves the possession. We are at a loss to know what to do please suggest should we go to court again as the below mentioned compromise deed also written in the courts.
My father Sarvjit Singh
His brother Kuljit Singh
His father Late Gurcharan Singh
HIs mother Surinder Kaur
This Compromise Deed is executed on 18-02-2009 at Ludhiana amongst Sh.Kuljit Singh-Petitioner and the respondent No. 1 & 3.
Whereas the aforesaid objection petition is pending against the Arbitration Award dated 11-12-2007 registered on 14-12-2007 with the Sub-registrar, Ludhiana in this Hon’ble Court.The parties have arrived at Compromise and terms & conditions of the same are as under, which is part & parcel and suplementary to the said Award.
1. That the H.No. B-I-815, Ludhiana will be sold in the open market by Sh. Sarvjit Singh within 6 months from the date of getting a T.S..-1 from M.C. Ludhiana. The original time period of 6 months for selling the house will be extended for reasonable time, if any legal complication arises.
2. That none of the parties and their family members of the Arbitration Award shall have no right to purchase the said house in any manner directly or indirectly.
3. That till the sale of the said house, Sh.Kuljit Singh –petitioner has a right to stay and enjoy the said house in a husbandry manner.
4. That after paying Rs.5,49,000/-(Rupees Five Lac Forty Nine Thousand only) to Sh.Kuljit Singh-petitioner by Sh. Sarvjit Singh-respondentNo.1, rest of the consideration amount will belong to Sh. Sarvjit Singh absolutely.
5. That the said amount of Rs.5,49,000/-(Rupees Five Lac Forty Nine Thousand only) shall be paid by Sh.Sarvjit Singh-respondent No.1 to Sh.Kuljit Singh-petitioner at the time of the sale of the house out of the sale proceeds.
6. That on receipt of Rs.5,49,000/-(Rupees Five Lac Forty Nine Thousand only) ,all the claims of Sh.Kuljit Singh-petitioner in respect of the estate of deceased Sh.Gurcharan Singh,father of the objector/petitioner,shall be fully settled and nothing shall be remained due towards Sh.Sarvjit Singh and his family and Smt.Surinder Kaur- respondent No.3.
7. That the above said terms and conditions are part & parcel and suplement to the said Arbitration Award and the same is enforceable and executable along with the above said terms.
8. That each party will give his affidavit regarding no objection for the change of ownership as per the Arbitration Award.
and property originally belonged to Late Gurcharan Singh but now distributed
sir please tell what relations are covered in the term family members and whether he has any right to get our property auctioned as we are already ready to give him sum of Rs 549000riven
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
11 September 2009 at 23:50
an accident taken place and long time passed but not claim lodged by the victim after the passing some time victim died not the due to the accident but in normal course now the heirs want to lodge claim wheter is it possible if yes u/s which m v act psl advice meriven
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Caveat
Sir,
My clients are trusty of a Tample.
The legal stamp of the tample is misplaced.
In city survey & Municipality name of the owner is different.
Let me clear that such property as known by olders that this tample is marethan 110 years old and it was constructed on the homes donated by nearer people.
there is no any leal documantory evidences are available to any person.
Now it is very urgent requirement to renovate the same.
What are the legal sapes to be taken to avoid any unfair interuptions?
Because there are some GURUS who told that thay have gift papers! but till today thay refused to show.riven