Anonymous
13 March 2011 at 18:31
Dear Sirs,
Can any one send me full judgment of 2006(3)Bom CR 700 or 2006(2)Mah LJ 277 please.
Anonymous
13 March 2011 at 17:54
I want to know that is it lawful for a government department to demand a blank signed paper from the applicant for getting registered the death of his relative and for issuing a death certificate. Actually such formality has been made mandatory by a government department (municipal Corporation) and i myself (being a lawyer) thing this demand to be illegal and unlawful.
pratik
13 March 2011 at 17:21
Section 2 (c)
Comments
i) There are three different sorts of contempt viz., scandalizing the court, abusing parties who are concerned in causes here and prejudicing mankind against persons before the case is bear; In re: St. James Evening Post, (1974) 2 ATK 469
Query : So can we say that while the witness how gives oral evidence in the witness box abuses or insult that person in any way in which it hearts the person who is not yet proved to be a offender can file a case of section 499 of the IPC, 1860 on the person who was in the witness box at the time of giving the oral evidence ? pls With the case law(S)(S).
so can we say that as per the above clause (i) we can file a cc (criminal contempt)cases on him than can we also if a case on him u/s 499 of the IPC, 1860. Pls with the case Law(S)(S).
Pls correct me if i am wrong ? Also give suggest on the abovematters in brief if possible.
Thnaks In Advance.
God Bless U All.
shankar sharma
13 March 2011 at 14:18
whether no marriage could be declared by the court.
Mohammed Sajid Khan
13 March 2011 at 14:17
Pls elaborate on the word "dispating" mentioned in below section 97 of "CPC, 1908"
"97. Appeal from final decree where no appeal from preliminary decree— Where any party aggrieved by a preliminary decree passed after the commencement of this Code does not appeal from such decree, he shall be precluded from dispating its correctness in any appeal with may be preferred from the final decree."
Thx..
jayesh sinha
13 March 2011 at 12:07
can anybody from experts give citation from supreme court/highcourt and express what is the law point that once the case is dismissed on merits can any tribunal or court can give further direction
Anonymous
13 March 2011 at 07:28
rejection of plaint ( I.A) dismissed in the subordine court then the next step is C.M.A filed in the dist. court or C.R.Pin the high court ?
pratik
12 March 2011 at 22:51
1) 1) What do u mean by doctrine of prospective overruling ? With the help of a suitable example pls Jurist.
2) I have heard that if any case whether criminal , civil, Tax matters, Divorce, Money case, Writ, SLP & any petition. If there are dismissed by the court than there are not treated as a binding precedent & can't further can't be used as a binding precedent. Or we can say that we can't say that we are fightining the case after referring that particular case laws which are dismissed by any court or tribunal in india.
Eg: Case of A in civil case regarding any matter or fact or substaniall question of law was dismissed by BHC (Bombay High Court). After Few years a advocate referred that case law & on that base he was defending the case which he was having. so the court said that he can't referred that case law or that case law in not binding precedent becasue it was dismissed by the court.
If the Word "Dismissed" arises in the judgement at last than we can't take that case law as a binding precedent.
pls clarify that which case are to be treated as binding precedent & which are not in any case whther tax matters, civil , criminal, SLP, writ petition, divorce, motor vehicle case any .
If possible with the example & case law(S) if any.
2) Also i have seen that advocate or lawyers used the words without prejudice, or with prejudice in their correspondence with the client or in any official letters. They say if we write without prejudice than the content of that letter or any notice can't be use as a evidence in the court or any ever in india . & if we use with prejudice means that particular content in the letter or notice can be used as the evidence in the court of law in india ? PLS elaborate where the abovementioned things are written or stated in any judgement of any apex court PLS.
pls do help me.
Thanks In Advance.
God Bless U All
pratik
12 March 2011 at 22:38
"I.T. Bagaria, Khan's lawyer, said the ED 'was given a chance by the court to produce evidence but there is a difference between material and evidence'. 'What the ED has produced is only material, they have not been able to produce any evidence to prove Khan guilty."
What is difference between Material and Evidence. PLS Explain with the example.
Thanks.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
cheating and breach of trust by Citibank in Home loan
I have availed the required home loan from citi bank in Feb 2008. The bank Sanctioned Rs.19,00,000/-and entered into an agreement for Rs. 19,00,000/-but disbursed only Rs.15,50,000/-. I have paid the Emis on rs.19,00,000/- upto feb 2009 then with prior intimation to the bank I stopped to pay the EMIs.As the bank did not disburse the remaining amount of Rs.3,50,000/-and did not give any explanation for the non disbursement of the full and final sanctioned loan amount, despite of my repeated requisitions to them, I had to divert Rs. 3,50,000/- from my business capital to complete the deal with the seller of the flat. Hence due to shortage of funds in business I suffered huge financial losses and could not raise the finance for my business as the bank reflected my name wrongfully in CIBIL for an amt.of Rs.19,00,000/-. Hence I demanded for the compensation for the loss from the bank but the bank has neglected the matter and sent me a notice under securitisation act in july 2010,which was duly replied by me immediately.Since then nobody from the bank approaches me even for the repayment of the loan. what should I do for the compensation from the bank?