Rajeev1978
14 March 2011 at 09:45
Dear All,
Every body knows to what extent all the TV channels have stooped down to enhance tgheir TRP ratings. The REALITY shows have gone from bad to worse, which is very repulsing for a average TV viewer. The news channels are promoting fear factors like tsunamis, flood, earthquake , and solar storm as if DOOMSDAY is round the corner. One of my aunts is in a constant state of phobia from unforseen evevnts.
Cant we sue these channels for promoting fear, superstition and insensible rumors to earn quick bucks ???
The height of tolerance is the ad for slice where katrins kaif is seen promoting ‘AAMSUTRA’ or rather ‘KAMSUTRA’. The company has stooped down to such a level that it is trying to take the help of a s*x treatise to sell a mango flavoured drink ! ‘Sex sells’ havent we heard before..?? Well that’s what the company is trying to do…Whats wrong in that ??? The ad starts with a opening line…Laalach ko pakne do… it seems like Vatsyavan is reading out from his own treatise to his hapless disciples.. !!!
The question is we as a country and society shall allow degradation of moral fabric till what extent..???
Is there any kind of censor , or has it become a kind of puppet in the hands of the unscruplous vetsed interests..???
What can we do to atleat try stop this MADNESS !!!!...???
Regards,
Rajeev
Anonymous
14 March 2011 at 09:30
Respected Experts,
It already 40 days since I sought information form Public Information Officer.But there is no communication from Public Information Officer.Now am in mood to go to Consumer Court for deficiency of service by Public Information Officer as well as make First Appeal .Is it O.K.???
And I need help from the respected members for drafting best possible petition in this regard in Consumer Court.And what amount of compensation should I claim from Public Information Officer in Consumer Court.
Thank's in advance
Nirupam Dewanji
14 March 2011 at 09:27
Sir
I am a junior advocate and appearing on behalf of my client, who is a complainant in a consumer case independently, but due to some unavoidable reason I am unable to appear on the date of final hearing. Court show cause me.
My query is how to write the reply of the show cause that I am not in trouble any more.
Anonymous
14 March 2011 at 08:50
We are a tenants association in Mumbai and had engaged a lawyer to fight our case in High Court against the builders who have bought the two tenanted properties. He had told us that two petitions are required to be filed and charged us Rs.25000/- for each petition till judgement. We had agreed to pay 50% advance and 50% after judgement but some how he extracted the full amount in advance for which we have evidance. To our utter shock he filed only one petition and in that too missed to attened the court intentionally on a important hearing while second petition is not filed at all. Due to this pure cheating we want to recover the money that we have paid and terminate the work given to him but do not know where to complain. Imagine how he bringing ill repute to profession of lawyers. Pl. help as we are middle class families and can not afford wastage of money due to such cheating.
Anonymous
13 March 2011 at 22:32
Pancholi Society Achal Avichal Chanchal Society
Total flats 56 168
Stilt parking 28 70
OC issued 2003 1993
Society is registered 2003 1993
Stilt Parking sold before 3 Many
society was registered
Stilt available after the 25 Left over out of 70
society was registered
Your society is registered in the year 1993 after the Occupation Certificate (OC) was issued.
There are 72 stilt parking with one belonging to society office and another is bought by the society in resale from another member. Out of 70 stilt parking 38 members are having 38 stilts (one each) and 16 members having 32 stilt parking (2 each). Few members having no cars continue to earn by illegally renting out the stilt for several years. Some members having two stilt parking have only one vehicle and kept the 2nd stilt unused for several years.
The amenities stand for “facility” and not “right” to claim ownership. Members cannot claim their rights on the ownership of the stilt parking which they have purchased on the basis of signing better amenities agreement, the builder gives an allotment letter mentioning as stilt parking no. ( ). Relying on signing better amenities agreement with the builder on plain papers by fixing adhesive stamp of Rs 10/- without registration is null and void. The better amenities agreement is neither registered nor any stamp duty paid. The builder has not executed an agreement with a flat buyer for sale of open parking space under the provisions of the MOFA.
It is evident from the sales agreement between the builder and purchaser that each of the flat purchaser had executed a declaration/undertaking in favor of the builder at the time of taking over possession of the respective flats, inter alia to the effect, that each purchaser unconditionally and irrevocably agreed that stilt parking spaces and open parking spaces shown in the plan belonged exclusively to the builder and would have no claim of whatsoever nature to the same and that they will not object to the sale of the same by the builder to any person.
manoj
13 March 2011 at 22:04
I have a query that the primary evidence of private document in public custody is destroyed by the department due to document retention policy . The department has submitted the destruction certificate of the documents in court and the photocopy is on court file and it contains endorsement of the concerned department official along with the person executed the document not in original but as photocopy only so what is the procedures of treating the photocopy of the endorsed document as secondary evidence any suggestions or any judgement for considering secondary evidence in absence( lost or destroyed) of original document
Anonymous
13 March 2011 at 21:37
Partnership act 1932 states that, a registered partnership firm can hold property in its name for the purpose of business. Does this mean that the partners can not sell property held in the name of firm unless creditors are settled. or by process of winding up. Bearing in mind that 1. No stamp duty is to be paid for transfer of property in firms name to name of its partners.
2. Creditors are for purpose of business.
3. If partners can directly sell property held in the name of the firm, without knowledge or notice to creditors than creditors will be easily defrauded.
Anonymous
13 March 2011 at 21:21
SIR,
ARE THERE ANY JUDGMENTS GIVEN IN FAVOUR ONE WHO MADE AN UNAUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION IN THE COMMON AREA OF APARTMENT EVEN AFTER THE CORPORATION HAS REJECTED THEIR APPLICATION FOR REGULARIZASTION
Anonymous
13 March 2011 at 19:50
I belong to Himachal Pradesh and my husband to J&K state. My first question is ...whats the difference between bonafide and domicile. and my second question is...can my daughter obtain any of these certificate of Himachal as that is my native place so that she can take the benefits what a Himachali supposed to have???? But she is born and brought up in J&K only.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Closure of business
Hello,
We are interested in closing the manufacturing set up which have below 50 employees.Can anybody guide plz.
Regards,