Anonymous
21 April 2011 at 19:59
Whether state Goverment Employee or Central Govermnet Employee suspension allowance can't be less than 50 % of the basic salary which law says ?
Is there any provision provide under the Indian Consitution , 1949 than pls only tell me the artilce.
Because my friend father is a income tax officer age 45 years & he has been suspended for a period of more than 3 months because of the bribe process (State of maharashtra) Suspension laws are different for ITO (income tax officer) and officer above the ITO. If yes than pls mention here.
How to know that which suspension act, rules are applicable to state employee & central employee. Does any Income tax officer comes under state goverment employment or under central govement employment ? I think any officer where ITO or any officer above the post of ITO comes under central goverment employment ? so it is due request to answer the post becuase my friend father is under suspension & which laws are applicable to ITO & other officer above the ITO. Pls do mention.
Thanks.
Anonymous
21 April 2011 at 19:49
Dear Friends Of the Forum,
Recently,one Bench of AP High court gave a judgement, and facts of the case is as explained below.
An Inamdar and tenant where fighting on ownership of the land, which was given on lease,to Army by the Inamdar for ten years in the year 1963 and subsequently it was extended for some more time/term. In a sudden change of turn now the Army claims the ownership of the land citing a clause in Inam abolition act AP (Telangana area) right to hold/ Vesting on date(s) Viz : (20-07-1955) and 01-11-1973. And AP HIGH COURT upheld the Army's claim and pronounced the Judgement in their favour.
Actually ARMY is holding the land as a lease holder ( given to them by Inamdar). How can a lease holder, and that to A Central Government (ARMY !) Organisation can do this to a law abiding citizen, and COURT supporting this action ( of THE ARMY)?
Dear EXPERTS OF THE FORUM KINDLY SHOW ME A WAYOUT to over come this problem, I need a quick reply/ solution PLEASE.
Thanking YOU ALL in advance, expecting an early reply PLEASE.
mahendrakumar
21 April 2011 at 19:47
can someone explain the meaning of "Top in List" . I have seen the term in confonet.nic.in,during the search of a case detasils.
Sanjay
21 April 2011 at 19:27
I would like to get in touch with a person who can help me create a trust.
Also advice if registering under trust act registration under comanies acti is beneficial.
Need help to create a entity to do charitable activities.
Am in Koper Khairane, navi Mumbai. Anyone in the vicinity may please contact me.
Anonymous
21 April 2011 at 15:42
ADVOCATES' CLERKS is employed by the pratising advocate's. So can we say that the person who has completed his LLB 3 rd year & doing articleship under the head of advocate is known as a advocate clerk. Also what should be the qualification to become a advocate clerk.
RULES OF THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY UNDER THE MAHARASHTRA
VEXATIOUS LITIGATION (PREVENTION) ACT, 1971.
So what does the vexations litigation prevention words acutually mean & the act is for what purposes becasue it contain's 18 section but couldn't understood why this act is for.
Thanks.
Anonymous
21 April 2011 at 15:20
A general question in all appeal in any Indian court regarding the pecuniary jurisdiction of the courts they have.
Pecuniary jurisdiction is applicable till original side of the court or till trial & when the appeal lies to any court whether sub – ordinate to the High court than Pecuniary jurisdiction does not come into the picture or we can say that it is irrespective of the Pecuniary jurisdiction we can fill a appeal in the appeal jurisdiction of the court even though the Pecuniary jurisdiction exact the limits of that appeal jurisdiction. Pls correct me & if wrong than where the appeal does lies. Pecuniary jurisdiction includes any other cost, interest, penalty or any other sum can anybody give the example that how to calculate the Pecuniary jurisdiction in any courts.
Pecuniary jurisdiction of bombay city civil court , small causes court becasue bombay city civil court act does not mention any Pecuniary jurisdiction.Where to find the Pecuniary jurisdiction of the court's in maharashtra. any site pls mention here.
Thanks.
Swaroop
21 April 2011 at 15:12
We are a hindu family from Karnataka. My grandfather is an agriculturist and a officer in education dept. He had inherited ancestral properties in saligrama village which is a house and agricultural lands about 5 acres through a partition deed in the year 1953. In the year 1966 he sells the house in saligrama which he got through the partition deed and buys a new house in mysore from govt. housing board and pays the money in yearly instalment. After he pays half the instalment he dies in the year 1979. He leaves behind his children as legal heirs including me as his grandson. I was born in 1975.
At the time of the death of my grandfather, 0-37 guntas of agricultural land which is ancestral and a house which he had bought in mysore was the remaining properties. The death was natural and no will was executed on this properties.
My father along with his brothers sold the 0-37 guntas of agricultural land in the year 1986 without a partition deed or any consent from my aunties or by any means of legal necessity.
My father along with his brothers and sisters declared themselves as legal heirs to my grandfather’s self acquired property in mysore (which is a house he bought in 1966) sold in the year 2000 without my consent or any legal necessity.
My father had transacted many properties under his name and deprived me of my rights on any of the properties which he had made later.
I have filed a suit for partition on his remaining properties which are two houses he bought it from housing board when he was working in bank. He had purchased this present properties by means of loan. He is deliberately challenging my every ia’s including injunction, rent deposit to court by giving false reasons and misleading by stating the nature of properties is self acquired through loan and I have no right, in hectic attempts to prolong the case and deprive my rights.
Sir, I want to know that I have challenged this suit as a HUF-joint family and I have a right of share for partition on present properties which are under his possession.
Document evidence are present with me. Is my claim valid?
1. The issue is that there is no valid partition after the death of my grandfather.
2. My father and his brothers sells part of the ancestral properties without consent from their sisters or mine in 1986.
3.My father and his brothers and sisters sells grandfather’s house in 2000 without my consent or legal necessity.
Can I pray for relief till the disposal of the suit as the case prolongs?
I do not have a steady income as I am in a private job and living separately with my wife and child.
My interest in property is in jeopardy without financial security for my family. My father is deliberately doing this from his selfish motive.
Anonymous
21 April 2011 at 15:09
A general question in all appeal in any Indian court regarding the pecuniary jurisdiction of the courts they have.
Pecuniary jurisdiction is applicable till original side of the court or till trial & when the appeal lies to any court whether sub – ordinate to the High court than Pecuniary jurisdiction does not come into the picture or we can say that it is irrespective of the Pecuniary jurisdiction we can fill a appeal in the appeal jurisdiction of the court even though the Pecuniary jurisdiction exact the limits of that appeal jurisdiction. Pls correct me & if wrong than where the appeal does lies. Pecuniary jurisdiction includes any other cost, interest, penalty or any other sum can anybody give the example that how to calculate the Pecuniary jurisdiction in any courts.
Pecuniary jurisdiction of bombay city civil court , small causes court becasue bombay city civil court act does not mention any Pecuniary jurisdiction.Where to find the Pecuniary jurisdiction of the court's in maharashtra. any site pls mention here.
Thanks.
Anonymous
21 April 2011 at 15:07
A general question in all appeal in any Indian court regarding the pecuniary jurisdiction of the courts they have.
Pecuniary jurisdiction is applicable till original side of the court or till trial & when the appeal lies to any court whether sub – ordinate to the High court than Pecuniary jurisdiction does not come into the picture or we can say that it is irrespective of the Pecuniary jurisdiction we can fill a appeal in the appeal jurisdiction of the court even though the Pecuniary jurisdiction exact the limits of that appeal jurisdiction. Pls correct me & if wrong than where the appeal does lies. Pecuniary jurisdiction includes any other cost, interest, penalty or any other sum can anybody give the example that how to calculate the Pecuniary jurisdiction in any courts.
Pecuniary jurisdiction of bombay city civil court , small causes court becasue bombay city civil court act does not mention any Pecuniary jurisdiction.Where to find the Pecuniary jurisdiction of the court's in maharashtra. any site pls mention here.
Thanks.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Domestic Violance Act 2006
a lady file complaint against her husband u/s 12 of domestic violance act. court pass interim order for 1500/- p.m and issue notice to her husband after notice he appear on first hearing inperson and after that he proceed ex-parte. court dismissed the application of complainant after 3 year and in judgment he also mentioned that all interim order if any are also set aside. Now the question arised that can complainant can file execution for the amount till date of judgement.