Anonymous
21 April 2011 at 13:22
what happens to the tenants right under mumbai rent act if the rented premises collapses due to old structure.Is it that the landlord get the possession of the rented premises.the premises is located in pune cantonment prime location.If the lanlord doesnot repair or rebuild the structure for next 20 years.What happens to the tenancy right.The tenants were not using the premises for long time duo to its dangerous condition.
arunkumar
21 April 2011 at 13:03
The suit filed by lanlord after the evcuation of the rented premises through high courtThe means profit case is pending since 7 years.now the ladlord expired and his son is following it up.but the original tenant also expired and teh ladlords son has given names of 2 sons of the tenant after the death of the original tenant.Is it correct as per the law and what reply should we give as a tenant's relative. please advise.
RADHE SHYAM JHATWAL
21 April 2011 at 12:00
i am in associates of sbi (sbop) as contractual service. which is recruitment done by sbop with approval of sbi . as on 2 august 2010 these own officers (contract) absorb by sbi but not of associates. we waiting of responce from sbi but sbi not replay what will we do? and please advice us about punjab haryana high court advocates for file pettion.
SHYAMSUNDAR
21 April 2011 at 11:31
Dear All,
The Electricity Board (MSEB) officers disconnected supply of my client in jan-2011 for arrears of bill issued in Year Feb-2000. No notice before disconnection. The conusmer Forum granted interim order to reinstate the supply and not to disconnect until further orders. The Officer of board (now Company) now issued a notice claiming amount due and on non payment will disconnect the electricity supply within 15 days.
My query is-
1. my cause of action occure in Jan-2011 after disconnection and will issuing notice help the board when interim order is against them?
2.The legal right to recover the amount is over as 10 years have elapsed the debt is now time barred, how to get the amount waived?
Any judgment on the above facts will be a helping hand.
Thanks in advance.
Anonymous
21 April 2011 at 10:29
can a pvt ltd co. file a recovery suit(summary suit) if that co. is not having a licence, if still suit is filed cn licence b obtained,,how much time does it take t gt licence what is the procedure,,
Legal Fighter
21 April 2011 at 07:14
I have got an order from State Information Commission in RTI Appeal. Despite repeated directions by SIC vide interim orders, the PIO didn't give any information and on final date the SIC disposed of the matter by order penalty and department enquiry against the PIO. Now the final order doesn't state anything about the information though the interim orders direct the PIO for the same.
I still haven't got the requisite information. What should I do? Which forum should i approach?
ess
21 April 2011 at 04:49
Whether mutation of immovable property can be done on the basis of will ? Name of the Act and number of section under which this is possible may please be indicated.
ess
21 April 2011 at 04:31
Whether stamp duty is leviable on immovable property acquired by a person by will executed in his favour ?
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
20 April 2011 at 23:52
Dear Ld Friends,
1. I have a personal case of my mother. THat There is a Ancestral Property(abbreviated further as 'AP') who has 7 Co-sharers in the aforesaid AP. Suppose A to G are the seven share-holders/co-shares in the AP. The AP is a 'very small commercial shop' which cannot be divisible into everyone Co-shares A to G peacefully and get it individual premises for everyone co-shares?
The person 'A' purchased/bought on registered Deed a share of 'B' and now the co-owner of two shares in the AP.
The person 'G' was missing since birth/early childhood and have lost permanently from last 25 Years and neither we heard about it.
2. NOw I filled a partition Suit with seperate Possession before Civil Judge taking 'A'(two shares) Against/versus 'C', 'D', 'E' , 'F' and leave out G to make party in suit.
3. The person 'C' and 'D' are refusing to [ sell or dispose of or make a partition of the AP ] and creating obstacle in the suit to get the AP partitioned or may dispose of the value of the property in five co-shares according to para 2.
Now My queries Are:-
1. That How the court may partition or may dispose of the value of the property although 'C' and 'D' are not ready to sell or dispose of the partition neither nor they want to purchase the two share of 'A' neither Nor 'A' want to purchase the seperate share of 'C', 'D' and 'E'.?
2. That 'C' and 'D' are taking undue advantage of the commercial shop (AP) and are not sharing any mesne profits to 'A' and 'E' thru daily earnings from commercial shop.
So for stopping further misuse of earnings thru AP, I filed an injunction application under Order 39 Read Sec 151 CPC for the closing of the shop & stopping its daily business transaction permanently and may fix an official seal at the property until the subject matter will adjudicate before Civil Judge.
++ It is right to file such application under Order 39 to close the shop permanently till resolve of the partition suit?
3. It is any other method or mode or way to get out such partition suit in easy way or any section of law may help in this particular perplexed situation?
4. What other type of interlocutory applications may help so that the commercial property(AP) may closed permanently till the matter not get resolved fully before court?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Invoation of Bank Guarantee
Respected Members,
I solicit your valuable inputs on the following: -
We have engaged a party as supplier for some equipment for our client. In pursuant to the contract, the party has issued a bank guarantee (BG) for an agreed amount. Due to non performance we invoked the BG subsequently. However, in the meantime, the party has got an injunction in their favour restraining us from invoking the BG and the bank accordinngly refused to pay the money.
The stay was continued for a long period, however, finaly we succeded in Supreme Court and got the stay vacated but without a reasoned order.
We then send a letter to the bank and advised the bank to release the money under the BG alongwith interest w.e.f. the date of invocation. Accordingly, the Bank released the money but without interest.
Our query is that whether the Bank is liable to pay interest or not?
If yes, then what would be the best course of action to recover the interest from the Bank.
Any supportive judgement of any court on this issues would help us, if any.