vishesh kumar
24 April 2011 at 18:12
legal point ;
suggest me the law that
Defendant cannot compel to give evidence on the the behalf of plaintiff.
please suggest the citation.
Anonymous
24 April 2011 at 16:41
The full judgment required of SC which say that SC judgment related to any ( civil cases , criminal cases, TAX matter, & SLP) are not applicable to J&K (jammu & Kashmir).
&
The full judgment required of SC which say that ((((If one judgement dealt by referring all the previous binding judgements on the same issue and other judgement is not referring any precedents, the prudent judge follows the first judgment.)))) In any cases means ( civil cases , criminal cases, TAX matter, & SLP)
So this 2 type of case laws required.
Thanks.
sannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
24 April 2011 at 16:27
r,sir
my query is "When and in what circumstances court may order de novo trials"
Arka Foundation
24 April 2011 at 16:22
Hello,
Can a retired public servant be punished/summoned to show cause notice/benefits can be stop, if his SIL [498a victim] complaints to his higer ups that
- FIL can be a legal witness
- any punishment/disciplianry action by company for giving dowry as per CCs Rules
- can his higher ups stop any benfits/PF basing on SIL's complaint
- Can a plaint can be filed aginst him for giving rules as per CCS Rules, if company do not take any action.
Regards,
Anonymous
24 April 2011 at 12:55
Dear Sir,
I am a Muslim and our family partition case is ongoing at Fast Track district court. Even after changed to normal to Fast Track after considering the illness and age factor of my mother in law, the case is still slow. Adjouring the dates further to their internal judge visits and meeting etc, and we are not satisfied with. Can you please advise how we can ask the court to expedite this case and finalize the partition? It is just a family partition having no any complication except one of the legal heir’s personal thinking of getting more shares against Muhammadan Law. Please advise what way or petition to expedite this case. Is there any way that we can submit our complaint directly to the court or higher authorities to expedite this case? Because, we do not want our lawyer to get annoyed by our pressure.
Anonymous
23 April 2011 at 20:58
Dear Friends Of the Forum,
Recently,one Bench of High court in a W.A. in W.P; gave a judgement, and facts of the case is as explained below.
An Inamdar and tenant where fighting on ownership of the land, which was given on lease,to Army by the Inamdar for ten years in the year 1963 and subsequently it was extended for some more time/term. In a sudden change of turn now the Army claims the ownership of the land citing a clause in Inam abolition act AP (Telangana area) right to hold/ Vesting on date(s) Viz : (20-07-1955) and 01-11-1973. And AP HIGH COURT upheld the Army's claim and pronounced the Judgement in their favour.
Actually ARMY is ( as a lease holder)holding the land as a lease holder ( given to them by Inamdar). How can a lease holder, and that to A Central Government (ARMY !) Organisation can do this to a law abiding citizen, and COURT supporting this action ( of THE ARMY)?
Dear EXPERTS OF THE FORUM KINDLY SHOW ME A WAYOUT to over come this problem, I need a quick reply/ solution PLEASE.
[If some wants to help me i will send the compleate details/ judgement copy, to his/her Email please.]
Thanking YOU ALL in advance, expecting an early reply PLEASE.
Anonymous
23 April 2011 at 19:44
Can You plz tell me if a person makes the settelement of his credit card and PL dues,
Would his name be remived from the cibil and how much time would it take?
mayilsamy n
23 April 2011 at 18:51
The municipality is increasing the capacity of the existing drainage (open drainage system) mean while due rain , all the drainage water has entered into our land. actually we do use the drainage as we have enough agriculture land to take care of our waste water..
it's seem municipality is not interested in act fast...
how proceed with this problem,
Anonymous
23 April 2011 at 18:21
Dear Sir/Madam,
It is very painful to ask this question at here, but i am in problem kindly help me.
I and my sibling is the only son of my Late Father. We lost our father three year back. We leaves in the joint family, me, my brother, my mom, and my grand parents. My grand parents has two son, one was my father (elder son) and other is my uncle, who left from the here for their earning purpose.
After we lost our father, the nature of my grand parernt has changed as some-one suggest him to acquire or demand the partition in the property of my father and in the money which we had received as Provident Fund.
And now the sitution is that they tease us every day by asking to go to court and ask the partition in the property.
Here i want to mention that my uncle has denied to serve my grand parents.
I want to ask some question in this regards:
1.Whether my grand parents has much higher right in the property of their son as compare to his daughter in law(my mom) and his grand sons(me and my brother)?
2.Whether there is no obligation of their younger son to serve them in their old age who denied form his duty?
3.As we are already serveing them from last 10 years, and there was no problem in that, As we are providing them all the required facility from food to medicine or etc... Is it legal to demand money in that case?
4.Me and My brother both are student of Professional course the field of commerce and also working in the firm to earn some money. Whether grand parents has any right to demand for the money earned by both of us in any way?
Kindly guide me in the above matter as i dont want to see break-up in my family and as i am unable to make them understand that it will not be benificial for the future of our family.
Please help me!!!!!!!!!!!!!
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
civil
whether parmananet injunction can be granted in favor of private person against the gram panchayat on shamlat deh.if yes show me law(citation)