BAALASUBRAMANNYAMM
12 May 2011 at 16:11
Respected Experts,
Plz. suggest me.
We want to purchase some property from the owners, who were minors in the year 1992, as the mother of the minor children had purchased the said property under her guardianship. Now the said minor boys have attained majority.
So what steps/procedure I have to follow at this movement, while preparing an Agreement of Sale or Sale Deed.
N.J. MISHRA
12 May 2011 at 12:52
we are having standard format of emplyoment contract. instead of taking the signature on every page we obtained employee's signature on a separate sheet attached with the said contract. whether this contract is relaible in the court of law to prove our case.
please member kinldy suggest your opinion
Anonymous
12 May 2011 at 12:49
Pl. advice if Sheriffs office is also closed during court vacations ?
Anonymous
12 May 2011 at 12:26
EITHER OF THE SURVIVING PARENTS COME AND SAY THAT THEY HAVE GIVEN THEIR CHILD FOR ADOPTION IT SELF IS A VALID GROUND FOR ADOPTION
--JUDGEMENT GIVEN BY R.M.BAPAT HIGH COURT OF AP
PLEASE TELL ME ANY JUDGEMENT SUITABLE FOR THIS OR THIS JUDGEMENT INFORMATION
Anonymous
12 May 2011 at 11:19
Mr.Parag entered into leave and license agreeement with Gopal on 10.3.10 for 12 months for staying in a flat in mumbai at monthly rental of Rs. 3500/= and security deposit of Rs. 25000/=. One of the terms of the said agreement is one month notice to be given before vacating if vacated within 6 months besides paying brokerage and registration charges incurred by Licensor.
On 9.3.11 he requested orally for renewal of lEAVE AND LICENSE AGREEEMENT FOR next 11 months on increased rent of Rs. 3850/= WITH THE SAME SECURITY DEPOSIT OF rS. 25000/= but other conditions remained same as per last agreement. There is no WRITTEN agreement FOR the renewal after 10.3.11 due to busy schedule of Licensor. In good faith it was agreed ORALLY BY LAND LORD and tenant TO CONTINUE THE LEASE OF FLAT FOR FURTHER 11 MONTHS. TeNANT ALSO paid 2 months rent on 7.4.11(wHICH WAS DUE ON 10.3.11 AND 10.4.11).
Suddenly on 3.5.11 he gave oral notice to vacate the flat on 10.5.11 and on 10.5.11 vacated the flat and demanded full refund of security deposit of Rs. 25000/=.
Landlord Gopal issued a cheque to Parag for Rs. 21150/= towards refund of security deposit by deducting one month rent of Rs. 3850/= Parag refused to take the cheque and demanding orally Rs. 25000/=. What arethe rights and remedies available to Land lord and Parag (Tenant) How parag can recover full 25000/= or he is entitled for Rs.21150/= only.
sripartha
12 May 2011 at 02:03
in pondicherry legal heir certificate are obtained only through court and not through daslidhar, it is filed by way of plaint, the question is the plaintiff resides in pondicherry and the defendant resides in tamil nadu, where to file the suit, what is the territorial jurisdiction to file the suit. and citation based on it. and whether sec 20 of cpc, can be of some help to this case, experts kindly enlighten me
Anonymous
12 May 2011 at 01:08
hi 5 months back i have executed a registered sale deed of my agricultural land.In that i have taken two post dated cheques which was mentioned in that deed.now both the cheques were dishhonoured.since the purchaser has failed to pay the considerable amount he himself wants to cancell the sale deed.So my question to you is can we both mutually go and cancell the deed?
Anonymous
11 May 2011 at 23:28
Kindly tell me limitation for filing a suit for possession.Regards
Anonymous
11 May 2011 at 22:45
Is a foreign court's Probated Will valid in India if it has been signed , sealed and registered by the Indian Embassy in the foreign country and then counter stamped (attested)on arrival by the external affairs ministry, new delhi and the fin.secy. of chandigarh secretariat? Is this probate enforceable in India? Any more legal formalities required before the Probated Will can be enforced in India?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
TELEPHONE SERVICES AND CONSUMER FORUM
Now a days the Hon'ble State Consumer Readdressal Commission, Chennai and District Consumer Forum, Chennai are not entertaining new complaints against the Mobile Service Providers by relying the Hon'ble Supreme Court case General Manager, Telecom, versus M Krishnan.
According to my view, this judgement will not applicable to the private mobile service providers in terms of TRAI Act 1997. Further the judgement in the case of Lakhbir Singh,the DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FEROZEPUR has clearly distinguished the applicability of the said supreme court judgement.
On account of the State Commission and District Forums orders rejecting the complaint, there are so many consumers are handcuffed and handicapped to fight their rights as a consumer.
Therefore I have decided to challenge the said consumer courts order by way of Civil Revision Petition before Hon'ble High Court Madras under Art.227 of Constitution of India on the ground that the State Commission and District Forum are failed to exercise jurisdiction and flagrant violation of law.
I Invite the vies from the members about the scope of the said revision petition
Thanks & Regards
T.V.Suresh Kumar
Advocate