Anonymous
28 November 2009 at 05:45
D/Frens,
Pliz read the Section 32 & 33 of Disability Act 1995:
Section 32 of the PWD Act 1995, it dictates that every appropriate Govt such as state Govt. shall identify jobs/services in its establishments for purview of 3% reservation for persons with disability.
Section 33 dictates that-
" Every appropriate Government shall appoint in every establishment such percentage of vacancies not less than three per cent. for persons or class of persons with disability of which one per cent. each shall be reserved for persons suffering from-
(i) Blindness or low vision;
(ii) Bearing impairment;
(iii) Loco motor disability or cerebral palsy, in the posts identified for each disability:
Provided that the appropriate Government may, having regard to the type of work carried on in any department or establishment, by notification subject to such conditions, if any, as may be specified in such notification, exempt any establishment from the provisions of this section."
My query Now Is....????????
-----------------------------
Q. Suppose, State Govt. has identified Jobs/Services in its establishment by constituting an expert committee as per mandate of section 32 of the PWD Act 1995. But has excluded certain posts from the purview of 3% reservation due to certain valid reasons, which are however identified by the Ministry of Social Justice Govt. of India.
Now, Is it compulsary for the State Govt. to sought necessary permission for exemption from Ministry of Social Justice & Empower, Govt. of India ? or no such permission is necessary for exemption ?
Please, reply its urgent !!!
Mr.Oibato
oibato@yahoo.co.in
K.C.Suresh
28 November 2009 at 05:16
Dear friends,
Will any lawyer from Patna call me in 9446042920. It is a accademical issue. KC Suresh Advocate
Anonymous
27 November 2009 at 16:30
I WANT SOME INFORMATION FROM DDA MCD POLICE AND COURTS. PLEASE TELL ME THE PROPER PROCEDURE TO FILE APPLICATION. WHERE WILL THE FEES IS DEPOSIT AND PIO SIT AND ETC
Anonymous
26 November 2009 at 22:58
Sub. Work relating to construction of cargo berth.
Dy. Chairman & CVO x port trust vide his letter dated --/07/08 had referred to the commission a case relating to the initiation of major penalty proceedings against the 5 officials.
Mr. A
Mr. B
Mr. C
Mr. D
Mr. E
The case was initiated on the basis of the observations of CAG on the work of construction of the cargo berth @ the cost of Rs. 40.98 Crore. The CAG has observed that the port Trust erroneously computed the amount of compensation for delay, thereby causing an undue benefit to the tune of Rs. 1.90 crore to the contractor. The commission, after perusing the report had observed that the commission’s 1st stage advice had not been obtained in this case. The commission, vide its O.M. of even no dated --/08/08 advised port trust to clarify the reasons for not obtaining the 1st stage advice and to expedite the inquiries and finalize the proceedings without delay. Port trust has furnished its reply, vide letter dated--/02/09
The commission has perused the report of port trust and has observed that there was a clear vigilance angle to the case and then chairman & FA&CAO had erred in not referring the case to the port trust Vigilance of the CVC. Now, the case as a composite case and furnish the complete proposals in respect of all officials for commission’s 2nd stage advice, as per the guidelines contained in the commission’s circulars no. -- dated -/-/06 and no. … , dated --/---08
The commission has also conveyed its displeasure to Sh. X the then chairman, port trust, since repatriated to his parent cadre, and Sh. Y the then FA & CAO. Port trust presently working in another port trust, for the failure to refer the case, having a clear vigilance angle, for the 1st stage advice of the commission, even through the official involved were covered under its jurisdiction..
Action taken by the Dept. may be intimated to the commission without undue delay.
my friend is Mr. Y will he can save him from any action taken by his dept.
Anonymous
26 November 2009 at 17:05
i wanted to know what government stipulations govern private banking .?
also how NBFCs are different from private banks and is private banking done by them .if yes , r there any advantages .
what all is covered under private banking .
Anonymous
26 November 2009 at 16:17
any case of Supreme court is there in which the deceision in State of Up Vs. govardhan lal AIR 2004 SC 2165 is not applied. if so p suggest submitted with due respects to all experts.
Anonymous
26 November 2009 at 14:05
BEFORE THE HON’BLE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT DELHI.
Â
COMPLAINT UNDER CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986.
IN THE MATTER OF:
MR.
POCKET- SECTOR- ROHINI DELHI-85
                                     Ph: Â
                                .................... COMPLAINANT
VERSUS
                               Â
MR.RAJESH
YOKASI INDUSTRIES
N.G.C SERVICES, DELHI CHAMBER DELHI GATE
NEW DELHI-2
                                    Ph:      Â
                            .................... OPPOSITE PARTY
Â
INTRODUCTION: S/O LATE SHRI R/O POCKET-SECTOR- ROHINI DELHI-85; I AM EMPLOYEE IN
MR.RAJESH, YOKASI INDUSTRIES, N.G.C SERVICES, 3453 DELHI CHAMBER DELHI GATE NEW DELHI-2 PROPRITOR OF YOKASI INDUSTRIES
Â
Â
RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
Advertisement given by yakasi industries on news paper, where they offer 180ah (tubular) battery at Rs.4900 with attractive 30 months warranty but when I called him , he said the price of Rs.4900 for exchange of old battery.
I purchased a 180 ah tubular battery from yokasi industries on 15 April 2008 of Rs.7500 (without exchange of old battery) which paid by me to RAJESH in cash.
At the time of purchase his commitment was that battery will give 5 to 6 hrs back up. It is a180 AH tubular battery with 30 months warranty card.
They also promised me for battery free home delivery, and free services for water level check up & water quantity.
But Rajesh did not fulfill any of his promise.
TRANSACTION:
I order a 180 ah tubular battery from yokasi industries on phone after negotiating with them of Rs.7500. Which was delivered on 15 April 2008 and Rs; 7500 paid by me to Rajesh in cash and take bill no 293 and warranty card of 30 months.
On 15 April 2008 when he connect the battery with my inverter at that time also battery was not performing at full capacity only one fan was running. That time Rajesh give me excuse that battery will take time to charge properly so I paid amount to Rajesh on faith of his statement. But this was not charged.
Then I called to Rajesh but he said my inverter is not working well on phone without checking my inverter and try to convince me for purchased a new inverter from him.
Â
Â
NATURE OF COMPLAINT:
Rajesh cheated me by giving false promise. At the time of purchase his commitment was that battery will give 5 to 6 hrs back up. But this battery backup is only 90 minutes only from the first day of delivery. He also promises me for free services of water level check up & water quantity, but he doesn’t come.
He delivered me defected piece of battery and not abiding by warranty clause.
I paid money them for a new 180 ah tubular battery deliver me a defective piece which two plates are already dead. Due to this reason the back up of battery is only 90 minutes which is not as per promised by them at the time of purchase.
Â
He also harassed me by giving new excuses like there is no problem in battery, even my inverter is charging at 6 A and this battery need 13 A for charging. But when I consult my inverter dealer there is no problem in inverter.
I again consult Rajesh then he said me check water in battery. But water was ok.
Then I call Rajesh again he said mechanic will come. But nobody come.
Then I call many times to Rajesh but he did not receive my phone and when I called through different number then he disconnect the phone without talking properly and also using cheap abusive language.
Now finally I told Rajesh about consumer court, then on 28 June 2008 mechanic come without fixing any time. But fortunately my son was in home. Mechanic demand food soda and put it into the battery after which the back up was reduced to 15 minutes only. After full inspection mechanic said cells of battery was dead so battery will be replaced within one or two days. But no body comes many days again.
Then I called to Rajesh again but he did not receiving my phone call. One day I called him by different phone number and remind him about consumer court then he promised me that battery will be replaced on 15/07/2008. but he came to my home on 17/07/2008 without inform me to take damaged battery without new battery or any proof of document against which damaged battery will be taken over by him. When I talk on mobile with my family member. He promised to come back within half an hour. But he didn’t come.
I called him again but he disconnect my phone without talking properly
I purchased battery specially for solving problem of my children exam and education. But they are suffering due to defected battery.
I spend many night without electricity, I have mental tension, fear of loss my hard earn money.
OTHER EVIDENCES OF SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT:
1. Cutting piece of paper of advertisement and catalogue that promised the concerned goods.
2. Receipt of payment made of bill no 293 as evidence of purchase.
3. Warranty card of 30 months
4. Copy of letters sent to the opposite party to request for rectification of fault and settlement of the
grievance.
Â
6. Statement in writing from my new battery dealer ensures that two plates of battery were damaged.
JURISDICTION:
As the total amount involved is less than Rupees 5 lakhs hence the complaint is being filed with the Hon'ble District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
Â
 PRAYER:
The complainant therefore prays:
(a)That opposite party is directed to refund the amount paid by the complainant to the tune of Rs.7500 because now I don’t have faith on Rajesh trade practices I just don’t want to continue any type of relation with him. I have fed up dealing with him.
(b) Complainant may please be compensated to the tune of Rs.25000 for the mental agony and harassment caused to him in the due course.
Â
 (c) Cost of litigation may also be awarded suitably.
PLACE:Â Â Â DELHIÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Signature
few more thing
i have send him a notice before filing case but strange notice comeback on ground not finding the address.after few days rajesh employee come to my house for take the defected battery but i refussed him because they have lost my faith now i just want my money back . please help, guide me if any mistake in my side
Anonymous
26 November 2009 at 14:04
BEFORE THE HON’BLE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT DELHI.
Â
COMPLAINT UNDER CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986.
IN THE MATTER OF:
MR.
POCKET- SECTOR- ROHINI DELHI-85
                                     Ph: Â
                                .................... COMPLAINANT
VERSUS
                               Â
MR.RAJESH
YOKASI INDUSTRIES
N.G.C SERVICES, DELHI CHAMBER DELHI GATE
NEW DELHI-2
                                    Ph:      Â
                            .................... OPPOSITE PARTY
Â
INTRODUCTION: S/O LATE SHRI R/O POCKET-SECTOR- ROHINI DELHI-85; I AM EMPLOYEE IN
MR.RAJESH, YOKASI INDUSTRIES, N.G.C SERVICES, 3453 DELHI CHAMBER DELHI GATE NEW DELHI-2 PROPRITOR OF YOKASI INDUSTRIES
Â
Â
RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
Advertisement given by yakasi industries on news paper, where they offer 180ah (tubular) battery at Rs.4900 with attractive 30 months warranty but when I called him , he said the price of Rs.4900 for exchange of old battery.
I purchased a 180 ah tubular battery from yokasi industries on 15 April 2008 of Rs.7500 (without exchange of old battery) which paid by me to RAJESH in cash.
At the time of purchase his commitment was that battery will give 5 to 6 hrs back up. It is a180 AH tubular battery with 30 months warranty card.
They also promised me for battery free home delivery, and free services for water level check up & water quantity.
But Rajesh did not fulfill any of his promise.
TRANSACTION:
I order a 180 ah tubular battery from yokasi industries on phone after negotiating with them of Rs.7500. Which was delivered on 15 April 2008 and Rs; 7500 paid by me to Rajesh in cash and take bill no 293 and warranty card of 30 months.
On 15 April 2008 when he connect the battery with my inverter at that time also battery was not performing at full capacity only one fan was running. That time Rajesh give me excuse that battery will take time to charge properly so I paid amount to Rajesh on faith of his statement. But this was not charged.
Then I called to Rajesh but he said my inverter is not working well on phone without checking my inverter and try to convince me for purchased a new inverter from him.
Â
Â
NATURE OF COMPLAINT:
Rajesh cheated me by giving false promise. At the time of purchase his commitment was that battery will give 5 to 6 hrs back up. But this battery backup is only 90 minutes only from the first day of delivery. He also promises me for free services of water level check up & water quantity, but he doesn’t come.
He delivered me defected piece of battery and not abiding by warranty clause.
I paid money them for a new 180 ah tubular battery deliver me a defective piece which two plates are already dead. Due to this reason the back up of battery is only 90 minutes which is not as per promised by them at the time of purchase.
Â
He also harassed me by giving new excuses like there is no problem in battery, even my inverter is charging at 6 A and this battery need 13 A for charging. But when I consult my inverter dealer there is no problem in inverter.
I again consult Rajesh then he said me check water in battery. But water was ok.
Then I call Rajesh again he said mechanic will come. But nobody come.
Then I call many times to Rajesh but he did not receive my phone and when I called through different number then he disconnect the phone without talking properly and also using cheap abusive language.
Now finally I told Rajesh about consumer court, then on 28 June 2008 mechanic come without fixing any time. But fortunately my son was in home. Mechanic demand food soda and put it into the battery after which the back up was reduced to 15 minutes only. After full inspection mechanic said cells of battery was dead so battery will be replaced within one or two days. But no body comes many days again.
Then I called to Rajesh again but he did not receiving my phone call. One day I called him by different phone number and remind him about consumer court then he promised me that battery will be replaced on 15/07/2008. but he came to my home on 17/07/2008 without inform me to take damaged battery without new battery or any proof of document against which damaged battery will be taken over by him. When I talk on mobile with my family member. He promised to come back within half an hour. But he didn’t come.
I called him again but he disconnect my phone without talking properly
I purchased battery specially for solving problem of my children exam and education. But they are suffering due to defected battery.
I spend many night without electricity, I have mental tension, fear of loss my hard earn money.
OTHER EVIDENCES OF SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT:
1. Cutting piece of paper of advertisement and catalogue that promised the concerned goods.
2. Receipt of payment made of bill no 293 as evidence of purchase.
3. Warranty card of 30 months
4. Copy of letters sent to the opposite party to request for rectification of fault and settlement of the
grievance.
Â
6. Statement in writing from my new battery dealer ensures that two plates of battery were damaged.
JURISDICTION:
As the total amount involved is less than Rupees 5 lakhs hence the complaint is being filed with the Hon'ble District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
Â
 PRAYER:
The complainant therefore prays:
(a)That opposite party is directed to refund the amount paid by the complainant to the tune of Rs.7500 because now I don’t have faith on Rajesh trade practices I just don’t want to continue any type of relation with him. I have fed up dealing with him.
(b) Complainant may please be compensated to the tune of Rs.25000 for the mental agony and harassment caused to him in the due course.
Â
 (c) Cost of litigation may also be awarded suitably.
PLACE:Â Â Â DELHIÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Signature
few more thing
i have send him a notice before filing case but strange notice comeback on ground not finding the address.after few days rajesh employee come to my house for take the defected battery but i refussed him because they have lost my faith now i just want my money back . please help, guide me if any mistake in my side
joyce
25 November 2009 at 22:23
Dear Experts ,whether law n its procedural code is important or the superme court reports, ILR's, or other such decided reports important? Since Judgment is issued on SC report and the main specific law is ignored by Judge.What to do with such judges. even though v get redress by appeal, what about judges altitude?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Succession Certificate
Whatis a Succession Certificate? Can a succession certificate is useful for transfer of ownership between disputed heirs?