Jyothi
08 May 2025 at 16:49
Kindly advise the law for ancestral temple when there are multiple heirs to claim ownership. Our temple is 300 years old and family of 4 brothers initially who built a temple with temporary structure. With time some heirs built small concrete structure for temple with help of donors. Nobody claimed the temple ownership as it was ancestral for 15 families. Some of us heirs formed Trust 10 years back and started running it. But one heir is creating issue . The land on which temple stands is shared by him and us . So he is claiming the entire ownership of temple. Does this mean the temple ownership is decided based on whose land it is sitting on present date ? Earlier days all brothers lived together and hence a separate temple land survey number was not created. But now with intention of kabza this person is locking it up as per his wish. Can we treat temple separately as it was built years ago by ancestors and all have equal rights on it ? Can a single person claim authority on temple ? Can our Trust with most of the legal heirs claim rights on temple legally ? If yes , what is the requirement and how to deal with this person creating issue ?
Eee Kay
08 May 2025 at 16:10
I bought two non judicial stamp papers from a licensed stamp vendor in tamilnadu in good faith with the name of the purchaser, serial numbers which were consecutive serial numbers on the same date written in his own hand along with the signature of the vendor and the seal in good faith and used the same for executing a sale agreement. But the vendor has recorded the sale entry in his sale register and therefore it is being said that the sale agreement is invalid.
what is your opinion? The Licensed stamp vendor either sold fake stamp papers or he failed to record the sale transaction in his sale register.
When the stamp papers are bought in good faith can the sale agreement be declared invalid?
Please give some citations of court judgements on the same.
sr_v@user
07 May 2025 at 18:12
Is there any judgement on Arbitration & Conciliation proceedings by honourable Supreme court? Can I get a copy of the same?
JEGADEESAN
07 May 2025 at 17:52
Sir
I would like to clarify some doubt regarding my rights in Property which has been bought by me 5/6 share from the Legal Heirs of Sudalai who has 2 Sons & 4 daughters
i.e. During 2024 I have bought 2 acres(UDS) out of total extent of 2 .40 Acre Agri land which has not been divided and originally bought by their father.
i.e. Mentioned in sale deed as 5/6 of total extent .
But now the remaining one person (Name : Subbaiya) demanded extra amount, If not pay by me he said that he would sale his share to other person even the entire property in my custody.
Because his brother( S. Durai) already spent much amount to release his brother Subbaiya from Jail and he has the evidence for that & Durai repaid the Loan which has been bought by his father in connection with his sisters marriage , and all of them confirmed orally that remaining share would be sell to me but now Subbaiya refused to do so .
1. Is there any legal way to stop/create any objection to sell the remaining 1 share ?
2. Is it possible to claim the above expenses by Durai from his brother and lien the property till his claims settled by his brother subbaiya ?
3.Can I claim the expenses regarding development of land and legal expenses in connection with the above said land from Subbaiya & to create lien till my claims settled by Subbaiya?
4.Can I file a Suit to sell the remaining property to me since majority of the portion of land already bought by me and also total extent under my enjoyment based on their family members oral confirmation/agreement?
Anonymous
07 May 2025 at 14:40
Dear sir
Good day to you all.
My father in law and mother in law both have expired leaving behind a regd. WILL. Their property is in Noida (a small bunglow.) Actually father in law expired earlier during COVID and as per REGD WILL, lease hold property was supposed to be transferred in mother in law name. That procedure was pending and going on but it the meantime mother in law also expired.
Now property is to be registered/mutated in the name of three class 1 heirs as per REGD WILL (two brothers settled abroad and my wife who is in India).
My question is whether succession cert or surviving member cert is required to proceed further. Since two brothers are settled abroad what is best way to inherit property in three class 1 legal heir names thru Noida authority and Local Govt. Regd Samiti (thru whom the plot was allotted in father in law name) There is no legal dispute among three class 1 heirs.
The original plot allocation share cert was submitted to Local regd. samiti and in turn they issued NOC for transferring the plot in mother in law name, which was then submitted to Noida authority and was pending but in meantime the mother in law also expired.
Can we rebuild the house making three floors for three legal heirs.
Thanks and best regards
Subramanya Rao
06 May 2025 at 13:56
Thanks for the information. Already 42 plus sites have been registered by sale deed through GPA given to developers by Landlords in 2001 0n words, based on Dasarahalli Gram Panchayat approved Layout in Rachenahalli, for various clients. I am also one among them. All 42 plus clients' titles will be illegal and questionable, If the Layout approval is illegal. If the landlords decided to sell the same land to a third party without the knowledge of clients, then all 42 plus clients will lose the title and possession to the new third-party customer with legal fight in the court? Is it true? or not. If true and if sale has happened how to get titles back legally speaking and how consumer protection will be taken care legally?
Maya Singh
05 May 2025 at 22:38
If in the bail order copy the Hon. Judge places a condition for the accused to take prior permission before leaving Mumbai then if he starts living in Mira Road, Thane, does that come under Mumbai or has he committed contempt of Court?
inayat
05 May 2025 at 00:05
Dear sir/ mam
Respected dignitaries of legal experts
Iam writing to seek your professional assistance in a serious matter concerning a property I purchased.
I recently discovered that a flat I bought, for which I completed registration and paid the full amount to the builder, is mortgaged to the municipal corporation, a fact not disclosed at the time of purchase.
The sale agreement and registration were completed on Date of April 24 2023, and I made full payment via bank transfer.
Issue: After registration, I learned that the flat is mortgaged to Municipal Corporation for mortgage of flats to release after construction
This was not disclosed by the builder or mentioned in any documents provided during the purchase process.
Documents Available: I have the sale agreement, registered sale deed, payment receipts, and property registration documents.
I can also obtain an encumbrance certificate or other relevant records as needed.
Concerns:
I believe this constitutes fraud or misrepresentation by the builder, as I was assured a clear title.
The undisclosed mortgage jeopardizes my ownership and exposes me to potential financial and legal risks.
I am seeking your expertise to Investigate the mortgage’s validity and the builder’s failure to disclose it.
i seek your help to Explore legal remedies, such as rescission of the sale, refund of the purchase amount, damages, or clearing the mortgage.
Advise on any immediate actions to protect my rights, including dealing with the municipal corporation or filing complaints with relevant authorities (e.g., , consumer court, or police).
I would greatly appreciate your guidance on the best course of action, estimated costs, and timeline for resolution. Please let me know what additional documents or information you require to proceed.
Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter. I look forward to your prompt response and assistance in resolving this issue
Regards
Syed inayatullah
Vijaya Bhaskar
04 May 2025 at 19:11
Dear Sirs,
To maintain the confidentiality of the parties involved, I am using pseudonyms.
Ramu is the lawful owner of the property. Balram is the first tenant, and Pramod is the second tenant. Both tenants are residing on the first floor.
Pramod approached the owner, Ramu, with a request for a lease. At Ramu's instruction, Pramod paid the lease amount to Balram, as Balram was going through financial difficulties. Balram, in turn, paid rent and interest on the amount received from Pramod.
A lease agreement was executed between Balram and Pramod based on the advice of Ramu, who also acted as a witness to the agreement. The lease amount was transferred to Balram's wife's account via IMPS.
Now, Balram is unable to repay the lease amount or the interest to either Pramod or Ramu. Aggrieved by this, Ramu filed a police complaint against Pramod seeking to vacate the premises, citing Balram’s failure to pay the interest.
In response to the complaint, Pramod expressed his willingness to vacate the premises if the lease amount is repaid; otherwise, he indicated that he would seek legal recourse. Ramu is not showing any responsibility to repay the lease amount to Pramod and she says that Pramod has paid to Balram and he should collect from him only and vacate the house.
Following a meeting involving all parties, Balram agreed to repay the lease amount along with eight months’ pending interest within a period of three months.
Now, Ramu and Pramod are requesting that Balram execute a written agreement confirming that he will repay the said amount within three months, failing which they will initiate legal proceedings.
In this context, I seek clarification on the drafting of the agreement: who should be the First Party and who should be the Second Party?
Thank you for your guidance.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
138 ni act cross examination
Sir in 138 case the accused advocate had done part cross examined the complaint and didn't complete the same.
Now accused is taking times from last several dates and not completing the cross examination.
The complainant advocate requested the magistrate to close his opportunity but he is not doing but only giving last opportunity.
What to do.
Thanks in Advance.