LAWyersclubindia LCI
Login  Register

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Telangana issue

(Querist) 24 October 2013 This query is : Resolved 
Article 4 of the constitution says state reorganization can not be construed as constitutional amendment. Article 371d.10 says, irrespective of any other section/article in the constitution, 371d stays in effect. these two are mutually contradictory. Can any learned lawyers enlighten us regarding this issue? I mean, which provision supersedes which? Can a law with simple majority in the house set aside a constitutional amendment?
Report Abuse
Devajyoti Barman (Expert) 24 October 2013
academic query-no reply.
R.K Nanda (Expert) 24 October 2013
academic query.
ajay sethi (Expert) 24 October 2013
we dont reply to academic queries
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate (Expert) 24 October 2013
No comment.
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate (Expert) 24 October 2013
No comment.
Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 24 October 2013
No reply to academic query.
Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 25 October 2013
We do not attend the academic queries.

Previous
Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :



Ask Query
Unanswered Queries

Follow us





Browse by Category