A man whose wife has repeatedly filed and had maintenance cases dismissed is now facing a new interim maintenance order. She has refused to live with him, even in his ancestral home, without providing a clear reason. While the High Court may not quash the order directly, the advice is to contest the case on its merits in the trial court, arguing desertion under Section 125(4) of the CrPC, as a wife is generally not entitled to maintenance if she refuses to live with her husband without sufficient cause.