H.s.a 2005 amendment.
devi
(Querist) 26 January 2016
This query is : Resolved
Regarding rights of women in ancestral property there are two S.C.judgements. One is Gandhi koteswaramma case of 2011 and the phulavathi case of Nov. 2015. Which one would be followed ?
When the amended law says women become coparcenors at birth like men how does the date of amendment and father being alive at that date make any difference? It's not so with men. Pl.clarify. Some fathers live till 100 some die young. How can that factor be relevant? Has any women's rights group challenged it?
devi
(Querist) 11 March 2016
Regarding rights of women in ancestral property there are two S.C.judgements. One is Gandhi koteswaramma case of 2011 and the phulavathi case of Nov. 2015. Which one would be followed ? When the amended law says women become coparcenors at birth like men how does the date of amendment and father being alive at that date make any difference? It's not so with men. Pl.clarify. Some fathers live till 100 some die young. How can that factor be relevant? Has any women's rights group challenged it?
