Consumer court decisions
R.venkatesh Naidu
(Querist) 08 November 2011
This query is : Resolved
Sir,
I request u please send the below mentioned citation herewith
1. c.s.subramanian Vs Dr.v.Kumarasamy 1994-2- CTJ 294, 1994-1-CLT-602 (MAD.HC)
2. HANS RAJ BHARADWAJ VS DR.VIJAY NIJHAWAN 1997-1-CLT 246(PUNJAB)
3. STEROCRAFT VS MOROTYPE INDIA LTD 1991-1-CPJ-111
4. BHOOP SINGH VS SURENDRA AGRO CENTRE -1993-2 CPR 519 (HARYANA)
5. VAGHRI GOPAL BHAI MASHABHAI VS PARMAR NAVALBEN BALABHA -1993-2CPJ 1038
6. V.VASANTHA COUMARY VS DR.T.RAMACHANDRALU -1998-3 CPR 227 (PONDY)
7. NARSINHBAI BHIMJIRAJPUT VS DR.J.K.PATEL - 1994 -1 - CPR 6 (GUJARAT)
8. AMARSINGH VS FRANCES NEWTON HOSPITAL - 2001 -1 - CPJ 8
9. BHAJANLAL GUPTA VS MOOLCHAND KHAIRATI RAM HOSPITAL -2001-1-CPR-70, 2000-1-CPJ-31
10 V.CHANDRASEKAR VS MALAR HOSPITALS LTD - 2001-1-CPJ-137(T.N)
11. DR. SR.LOUIE VS SMT.KANNOLIL PATHUMMA - 1993-1 -CTJ-32
12. SURESHNARAYANAN LAL VS MANAGING DIRECTOR BIHAR STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION -1994-3-CPJ-3
i need the above citations very urgently. if any body can help me
thanking you
Kiran Kumar
(Expert) 08 November 2011
have u tried to find them in some other reports...generally the same judgment is published in various reporters.
try to find a few from the official websites of NCDRC or State Commission.
ajay sethi
(Expert) 08 November 2011
ryou need 11 judgements . try to seach in indian kanoon website
prabhakar singh
(Expert) 08 November 2011
22Sep2000 (GJX) 0003 SCTN
S.T.D.R.C., Tamil Nadu
V. CHANDRASEKAR, COMPLAINANT
Vs.
MALAR HOSPITALS LTD, OPPOSITE PARTY
Decided on: September 22, 2000
UDGES
BANUMATHI BASKARAN, M S JANARTHANAM
JUDGMENT
O.P. No. 127 of 2000, decided on September 22, 2000.
TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI
Counsels : Mr. C. R. Sathindran - Complainant.
ORDER
Mr. Justice M. S. Janarthanam, President - This action has come up before us for admission today.
We heard the arguments of learned Counsel Mr. C. R. Sathindran.
We perused the averments in the complaint and also the documents filed alongwith it.
Such perusal reveals the following factors :
The complainant is one V. Chandrasekar. On 2.8.1999 he was stated to have developed severe chest pain. He got admitted in Malar Hospitals Ltd. (opposite party). He was admitted as an in-patient in the said hospital for a period of five days.
As per the diagnosis, he underwent Coronary Angiogram on 3.8.1999. On 5.8.1999, he underwent Coronary Angioplastry plus Stenting to LAD at the opposite party's hospital. He was then discharged on 9.8.1999.
He was not relieved, of the pain and suffering even after such treatment. Again, he was re-admitted in the opposite party's hospital on 8.9.1999. He was put in the ICU for a day and then shifted to the ward. He was stated to have been relieved of the pain. Later, it was found out that the relief was only temporary.
He had paid a sum of Rs. 88,250/- for Angiogram and Angioplastry at the opposite party's hospital. This apart, he also paid a sum of Rs. 41,400/- as hospital charges for hospitalisation for a period between 2.8.1999 and 9.8.1999. This . . .
(For Full Text please visit www.ejurix.in if you are a subscriber, otherwise click the link below to buy this document)
M V Gupta
(Expert) 09 November 2011
You may get the full text of the judgements from the web sites of the concerned SCDRCs.
Pl search on "confonet.nic.in"
