Member (Account Deleted)
30 September 2014 at 12:24
Dear Sir,
I have a query.
Our Company M/s Gemini (Tenant) has taken a building on lease and the owner of the building is SOL (Owner). The building and both the owners and tenants are residence of Hyderabad. Now we are undergoing audit in our company. Auditors are asking us to get lease deed registered and when we approached the sub registrar office they said that when property tax is paid by the owner of the building then there is no need to pay stamp duty while registering the Lease Deed accordingly we have asked for GO/notification where it states that "NO STAMP DUTY IS REQUIRED WHILE REGISTERING THE LEASE DEED WHEN OWNER IS PAYING THE PROPERTY TAX" they clearly stated there is NO NOTIFICATION /GO. in our case SOL has been paying the property tax and the term of lease deed is 1 year. But our auditors are asking what is the proof that No stamp duty is required.
Hence i request you to kindly let us know whether stamp duty is required or not in case of registering the lease deed and Owner is paying the property tax.
I am also attaching the draft of the lease deed for your reference.
Kindly do the needful
Rahul Sangani
30 September 2014 at 11:42
Commercial Property Bought in the year 2002 by "A" from "B". now this property got sold in 2014.
"A" died in 2014, without any will.
now whether his daughters can claim share from sale proceeds of such property?
stefen Ronald
30 September 2014 at 11:26
Sir,
Is there any power for high court to change a conduct certificate of students, if a principal/coordinator of that institution issues a not satisfactory conduct certificate to a student on some vengeance??
What all possibilities are there to redress the grievance of students on the basis of law for the above matter?
Syed Tarik Raj
30 September 2014 at 10:51
Sir please find the attach copy. Sir I was given the penalty of withholding of increments of pay for two years without cumulative effect after departmental inquiry.
Now I want to know is that
1. Whether I will get the due salary after completion of this two years penalty.
2. After completion of this penalty what will be my new increment. Whether I will get 9% increments in the third year that is 3% in the first year, 3% in the second year and 3% in the third year all total 9%.
3.Is there any way or rule or clause for this. If so kindly let me know the rules/clause etc.
I am not able to get any idea about this in the office memorandum No.6/3/2013-Estt (Pay-I)
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions
Department of Personnel & Training
North Block, New Delhi
Dated the 6th February, 2014. It is not clearly mentioned about what I want to know.
So please help me and guide me in this regard. I will be very thankful to you if you kindly help me in this respect.
chinu
30 September 2014 at 01:13
Is it advisable to buy a flat by paying the entire
amount in one shot to a reputed builder or by going via home loan.
Raj
30 September 2014 at 00:51
My SIL has filed the 498-A, Domestic Violence, 125 Crpc in her home town and we are living in different city and every month we have to attend court hearing for 2-3 times in her area..we filed the divorce, child custody but she transferred in her home town and almost 4 years has passed and cases are pending there. Family peace has been disturbed, young sisters remain unmarried due to criminal cases..Move to High court for quashing but dismissed..Asked her for compromise but she refused..Came to know that these cases run for 10-15 years and even more..asked for mediation but she refused.. she and her family memebers are enjoying for the harassment which we regulalry facing
Some one told me that they will not bow down unless some counter cases to be filed..But as per my knowledge the counter cases to be filed after being acquitted till that time god knows whether we survives or become bankrupt by the course of time
Please suggest some remedy
RAJ
30 September 2014 at 00:24
Respected sir,
by the resources of your valuable expertise and experience i request you to kindly enlighten me on these matters.
1.Are the emails send from the personal mails/companymails (properly traceable accounts with domain names etc.)with assurance or acknowledgment for some facts like (documents received,money transfered,job assurances etc ) are court worthy evidences for prosecuting the guilty if those terms agreed via emails are not obeyed,executed or provided by the parties.?
2.What is the exact way or format ( in attachments ,or forwaded attachments,pdf format etc.or links)of archiving and producing these email evidences in the court by the present procedures?
3What in case the email is from a firm or citizen from other nation where the Indian courts have no jurisdiction.Where is such an objection or petition filed in the specified international scenario?
DHIRAJ CHANDRAKANT KUMBHAR
30 September 2014 at 00:11
sir if the 7/12 extracts of open land stands in my favour since last 50years till today recorded on d basis of registered sale deed. Then can any one other person claim possession over the same property in absence of any documentary proof as like receipt annual land tax or crop statment for 50years. he has filed Suit against me for cancellation of sale deed executed in my favour 50years before in absence of any documentary possession proof alleging to be date of knowledge on 2013 and also contended that the same property was sold him by d same person even prior to us i.e. 54 years before from whom i hv purchased the said property. However till today his name is never been recorded in 7/12 extract Whether the same it valid
SHANKY CHOPRA
29 September 2014 at 23:52
sir,
i want to know the complete procedure for converting partnership firm in to proprietorship firm and the legal formalities also.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Delhi rent control
The disputed area as per Punjab Municipal Act 1911 was given away to Shahdara Municipal Committee, thus DRC governs tha area.
Now as per SDM office record the area is still a rural area and no notification by MCD u/s 507 has been out for it nor by DRC u/s 1(2).
Q is that will DRC governs the area or not.